Issue |
J Extra Corpor Technol
Volume 23, Number 2, June 1991
|
|
---|---|---|
Page(s) | 34 - 38 | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/ject/1991232034 | |
Published online | 21 August 2023 |
Original Article
The Effect of Extracorporeal Circulation Time and Patient Age on Platelet Retention During Cardiopulmonary Bypass: A Comparison of Roller and Centrifugal Pumps
Medical Perfusion Department, Schumpert Medical Center and Department of Medicine (Critical Care), Louisiana State University Medical Center, Shreveport, Louisiana
* Address correspondence to: Beverly Parault, RN, CCP, Director, Medical Perfusion Department, Schumpert Medical Center, P.O. Box 21976, Shreveport, LA 71120-1976
Preservation of platelet count during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) was retrospectively studied in 784 consecutive adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery, including high-risk “special case” patients. The extracorporeal circuit included a closed membrane oxygenator system for all patients. A roller pump (Co be Laboratories or Stockert-Shiley) was used for bypass in one group of 564 patients, while a centrifugal pump (BioPump, BioMedicus) was used in a second group of 220 patients. There was no difference between the roller and centrifugal pump groups with respect to age, sex, total bypass time, and pre-bypass platelet count. For purposes of this study, retention refers to the patient's last platelet count on CPB expressed as a fraction of the pre-CPB platelet count. The centrifugal pump group had a higher platelet retention than the roller pump group (.619 vs .595, p<.05). Patients with prolonged bypass times (> 120 min) had a lower platelet retention in the roller pump group (.568 vs .610, p<.05), but no significant decrease was seen in the centrifugal pump group (.617 vs .621, p>.05). Patients OVer the age of 70 had a lower retention than those under 70 in the roller pump group (.576 VS .604, p<.05), but there was no difference in the centrifugal pump group (.600 vs .628, p>.05). The special case patients had a lower retention when the roller pump was used (.563 vs .607, p<.05), while platelet retention was not affected in the centrifugal pump group (.603 vs .625, p>.05), however bypass time was also prolonged in the special case group. The centrifugal pump results in improved platelet retention on cardiopulmonary bypass. This improvement is most notable in prolonged cases(> 120 min), in older patients(> 70 yrs), and in special cases.
Key words: cardiopulmonary bypass / centrifugal blood pump / perfusion systems / platelet count / quality assurance / extracorporeal circulation
© 1991 AMSECT
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.