Open Access

Table 5

Qualitative themes and course outcomes.

Theme Integration into curriculum Course outcomes Quantitative finding
CUL Incorporate international healthcare systems and standards
  • Pre-post test difference; 2 × 2 ANOVA

  • Final course grade comparisons; independent t-test and Mann–Whitney U

  • The ECS cohort consistently scored higher on the pre and post test written examinations. There was significant improvement over time in both cohorts.

  • There was no significant difference between cohorts in final course grades (p > 0.05).

TIME Development of activities that engage online cohorts (flipped classroom)
  • Pre-post test difference; 2 × 2 ANOVA

  • Final course grade comparisons; independent t-test and Mann–Whitney U

  • The ECS cohort consistently scored higher on the pre and post test written examinations. There was significant improvement over time in both cohorts.

  • There was no significant difference between cohorts in final course grades (p > 0.05).

PREP Planning meetings prior to implementation
  • Pre-post test difference; 2 × 2 ANOVA

  • Final course grade comparisons; independent t-test and Mann–Whitney U

  • The ECS cohort consistently scored higher on the pre and post test written examinations. There was significant improvement over time in both cohorts.

  • There was no significant difference between cohorts in final course grades (p > 0.05).

B&F Asynchronous interactions between students and teachers, periodic synchronous group meetings
  • Pre-post test difference; 2 × 2 ANOVA

  • Final course grade comparisons; independent t-test and Mann–Whitney U

  • The ECS cohort consistently scored higher on the pre and post test written examinations. There was significant improvement over time in both cohorts.

  • There was no significant difference between cohorts in final course grades (p > 0.05).

REL Synchronous meetings between assigned advisor-advisee pairs
  • Pre-post test difference; 2 × 2 ANOVA

  • Final course grade comparisons; independent t-test and Mann–Whitney U

  • The ECS cohort consistently scored higher on the pre and post test written examinations. There was significant improvement over time in both cohorts.

  • There was no significant difference between cohorts in final course grades (p > 0.05).

SEL Student selection based on healthcare experience and proven academic record
  • Correlations; Pearson’s r, Spearman’s Rho

  • No significant correlation between years of healthcare experience or highest degree earned and final course grade was found (p > 0.05).

STU A diverse and representative cohort was sought
  • Correlations; point biserial; Pearson’s r

  • No significant correlation between gender or age and final course grade was found (p > 0.05).

PRA Set time zone standards (EST), periodic synchronous meetings
  • Pre-post test difference; 2 × 2 ANOVA

  • Final course grade comparisons; independent t-test and Mann–Whitney U

  • The ECS cohort consistently scored higher on the pre and post test written examinations. There was significant improvement over time in both cohorts.

  • There was no significant difference between cohorts in final course grades (p > 0.05).

Theme codes, implementations into the program, and quantitative outcome items used as correlate measures. Primary themes are shaded, subthemes are in white. B&F: Boundaries and Flexibility; CUL: Culture; ECS: Extracorporeal Science; PRA: Practical Considerations; PREP: Preparation; REL: Relationship; SEL: Selecting Participants; STU: Student Characteristics.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.