EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 58 / No 2 (June 2026) J Extra Corpor Technol, 58 2 (2026) 117-123 References
Open Access
Issue
J Extra Corpor Technol
Volume 58, Number 2, June 2026
Page(s) 117 - 123
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/ject/2026007
Published online 19 June 2026
  1. Elgebaly SA, Houser SL, El Kerm AF. Evidence of cardiac inflammation after open heart operations. Ann Thorac Surg. 1994;57:391–396. [Google Scholar]
  2. Cremer J, Martin M, Redl H. Systemic inflammatory response syndrome after cardiac operations. Ann Thorac Surg. 1996;61:1714–1720. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Ji B, Undar A. Comparison of perfusion modes on microcirculation during acute and chronic cardiac support: Is there a difference? Perfusion. 2007;22:115–119. [Google Scholar]
  4. Hickey PR, Buckley MJ, Philbin DM. Pulsatile and nonpulsatile cardiopulmonary bypass: review of a counterproductive controversy. Ann Thorac Surg. 1983;36:720–737. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Poswal P, Mehta Y, Juneja R, Khanna S, Meharwal ZS, Trehan N. Comparative study of pulsatile and nonpulsatile flow during cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Card Anaesth. 2004;7:44–50. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. O’Neil MP, Alie R, Guo LR, Myers ML, Murkin JM, Ellis CG. Microvascular responsiveness to pulsatile and nonpulsatile flow during cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg. 2018;105:1745–1753. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Li G, Jiang W, Zhang Y, et al. The outcome of pediatric patients undergoing congenital cardiac surgery under pulsatile cardiopulmonary bypass in different frequencies. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2018;14:1553–1561. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Tan A, Ki KK, Callumban K, et al. Pulsatile perfusion during cardiopulmonary bypass. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2022;54:60–67. [Google Scholar]
  9. Fukae K, Tominaga R, Tokunaga S, Kawachi Y, Imaizumi T, Yasui H. The effects of pulsatile and nonpulsatile systemic perfusion on renal sympathetic nerve activity in anesthetized dogs. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1996;111:478–484. [Google Scholar]
  10. Shahandashti FJ, Asadian S, Habibi N, Gorjipour F, Jalali A, Toloueitabar Y. Pulsatile versus non-pulsatile perfusion in coronary artery bypass operation: The comparison of laboratory and clinical outcomes. Perfusion. 2023;38(5):1053–1061. https://doi.org/10.1177/02676591221096224. [Google Scholar]
  11. Ji B, Undar A. An evaluation of the benefits of pulsatile versus nonpulsatile perfusion during cardiopulmonary bypass procedures in pediatric and adult cardiac patients. ASAIO J. 2006;52:357–361. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mat.0000225266.80021.9b. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hopewell S, Chan AW, Collins GS, Hróbjartsson A, Moher D, Schulz KF, et al. CONSORT 2025 statement: updated guideline for reporting randomised trials. BMJ. 2025;389:e081123. [Google Scholar]
  13. Gu W, Ji B, Myers JL, Undar A. Pulsatile perfusion during cardiopulmonary bypass: does it improve end-organ function? Perfusion. 2020;35:108–117. [Google Scholar]
  14. Glauber M, Meoni F, Romano G, Gatti G, Miceli A. Pulsatile versus nonpulsatile perfusion: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021;60:542–550. [Google Scholar]
  15. Ündar A, Wang S. Pulsatile flow during cardiopulmonary bypass procedures. In: Tschaut R, Rosenthal T, Hodge A, Dreher M, eds. Extracorporeal Circulation in Theory and Practice. PABST VERLAG; 2020: 279–285. [Google Scholar]
  16. O’Neil MP, Fleming JC, Badhwar A, Guo LR. Pulsatile versus nonpulsatile flow during cardiopulmonary bypass: microcirculatory and systemic effects. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012;94:2046–2053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.05.065. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Ranucci M, De Toffol B, Isgrò G, Romitti F, Conti D, Vicentini M. Hyperlactatemia during cardiopulmonary bypass: determinants and impact on postoperative outcome. Crit Care. 2006;10:R167. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Demers P, Elkouri S, Martineau R, Couturier A, Cartier R. Outcome with high blood lactate levels during cardiopulmonary bypass in adult cardiac operation. Ann Thorac Surg. 2000;70:2082–2086. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Murkin JM, Martzke JS, Buchan AM, Bentley C, Wong CJ. A randomized study of the influence of perfusion technique and pH management strategy in 316 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery. II. Neurologic and cognitive outcomes. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1995;110:349–362. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Chiu IS, Chu SH, Hung CR. Pulsatile flow during routine cardiopulmonary bypass. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 1984;25:530–536. [Google Scholar]
  21. Sievert A, Sistino J. A meta-analysis of renal benefits to pulsatile perfusion in cardiac surgery. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2012;44:10–14. [Google Scholar]
  22. Zhao J, Liu JP, Feng ZY, Liu YL, Li SJ, Long C. Clinical application of pulsatile perfusion during cardiopulmonary bypass in pediatric heart surgery. ASAIO J. 2009;55:300–333. [Google Scholar]
  23. Schreiner RS, Rider AR, Myers JW, et al. Microemboli detection and classification by innovative ultrasound technology during simulated neonatal cardiopulmonary bypass at different flow rates, perfusion modes, and perfusate temperatures. ASAIO J. 2008;54:316–324. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Jufar AH, Lankadeva YR, May CN, Cochrane AD, Bellomo R, Evans RG, American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory. Integrative and Comparative Physiology. 2020;319(6):R690–R702. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.