Comparison of Blood Gas and Electrolyte Test Results from the Gem-Premier and the ABL-70 versus a Conventional Laboratory Analyzer
J Extra Corpor Technol, 35 1 (2003) 24-27
Published online: 2023-08-11
Articles citing this article
The Citing articles tool gives a list of articles citing the current article.
The citing articles come from EDP Sciences database, as well as other publishers participating in CrossRef Cited-by Linking Program. You can set up your personal account to receive an email alert each time this article is cited by a new article (see the menu on the right-hand side of the abstract page).
Cited article:
This article has been cited by the following article(s):
Accuracy of Potassium Measurement Using Blood Gas Analyzer
Hatim Mahmoud, Zied Jaffar, Yousef M Al Alawi, Fatimah Al Alsuhaimi, Mohammed A A Khoja, Muath A Al-Ahmadi, Abdullah M Alattas, Mohammed F Alhusayni, Mohammed E Mahroos and Muath A AlrehailiCureus (2022)
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.23653
Clinical, Operative, and Economic Outcomes of the Point-of-Care Blood Gases in the Nephrology Department of a Third-Level Hospital
Ana Laila Qasem Moreno, Paloma Oliver Sáez, Pilar Fernández Calle, Gloria del Peso Gilsanz, Sara Afonso Ramos, Mariana Díaz Almirón and Antonio Buño SotoArchives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine 144 (10) 1209 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2019-0679-RA
Severe Underestimation of Serum Na following IVIG Treatment
Mrigender S Virk, Nathan P Dean and Edward C C WongLaboratory Medicine 49 (4) 372 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1093/labmed/lmy025
Comparison of point-of-care versus central laboratory measurement of hematocrit, hemoglobin, and electrolyte concentrations
Alexandra Gavala and Pavlos MyrianthefsHeart & Lung 46 (4) 246 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrtlng.2017.04.003
Point-of-care testing: where is the evidence? A systematic survey
Valentina Pecoraro, Luca Germagnoli and Giuseppe BanfiClinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM) 52 (3) 313 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2013-0386
Comparison of 3 different multianalyte point-of-care devices during clinical routine on a medical intensive care unit
Vanessa Stadlbauer, Simon Wallner, Tatjana Stojakovic and Karlheinz H. SmolleJournal of Critical Care 26 (4) 433.e1 (2011)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2010.09.003
In Vitro Comparison of the New In-Line Monitor BMU 40 versus a Conventional Laboratory Analyzer
F. Oliver Grosse, David Holzhey, Volkmar Falk, Jan Schaarschmidt, Klaus Kraemer and Friedrich W. MohrThe Journal of ExtraCorporeal Technology 42 (1) 61 (2010)
https://doi.org/10.1051/ject/201042061
Clinical evaluation of the new BMU 40 in-line blood analysis monitor
Jan Schaarschmidt, Joerg Seeburger, Michael A. Borger, F. Oliver Grosse, Klaus Kraemer and Friedrich W. MohrPerfusion 24 (4) 277 (2009)
https://doi.org/10.1177/0267659109350935
Blood gas measurements using the Bayer Rapid Point 405: are we basing our decisions on accurate data?
Frederic Sarrazin, Michael J. Tessler, Kenneth Kardash, Elizabeth McNamara and Christina HolcroftJournal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing 21 (4) 253 (2007)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-007-9082-z
Clinical Evaluation of the ABL-77 for Point-of-Care Analysis in the Cardiovascular Operating Room
Jack S. Prichard, John S. French and Nestor AlvarThe Journal of ExtraCorporeal Technology 38 (2) 128 (2006)
https://doi.org/10.1051/ject/200638128