Original Article

A Comparison of the Benefits of Roller Pump Versus Constrained Vortex Pump in Adult Open-Heart Operations Utilizing Outcomes Research

Henderson, Nevada

^* Address correspondence to: Timothy A. Dickinson, MHA, CCP, 1689 Mountain Song Court, Henderson, NV 89014

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare roller pump and centrifugal pump technologies in routine adult open-heart operations to demonstrate the usefulness of applying a proven method of uniform risk stratification (outcomes research). Objective and readily available preoperative patient data was collected retrospectively on 102 non-randomized and consecutive adult openheart operations. Group 1 consisted of 51 adult open-heart operations utilizing a roller pump for arterial blood perfusion. Group 2 consisted of 51 adult open-heart procedures utilizing a constrained vortex pump for arterial blood perfusion. A comparison between the frequency of occurrence of 53 different preoperative risk factors in the roller pump group and the centrifugal pump group found no statistically significant differences (p < 0.05). Outcome data for the roller pump and centrifugal pump groups included such data comparisons as intensive care unit length of stay (LOS), post operative LOS, total LOS, total patient charge, reimbursement, morbidity, and mortality, which revealed no statistically significant differences (p < 0.05). Further comparison studies of roller pumps versus centrifugal pumps for arterial blood perfusion should incorporate this kind of comprehensive data comparison and analysis to reasonably assure that both pump groups are very similar before outcomes research is performed.