Issue |
J Extra Corpor Technol
Volume 26, Number 3, September 1994
|
|
---|---|---|
Page(s) | 114 - 120 | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/ject/1994263114 | |
Published online | 21 August 2023 |
Original Article
Predicting Oxygenator Clinical Performance from Laboratory In-Vitro Testing
1
Division of Circulation Technology, School of Allied Medical Professions, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
2
Indiana University Hospitals, Indianapolis, Indiana
* Address correspondence to: Philip D. Beckley, PhD, Division of Circulation Technology, School of Allied Medical Professions, The Ohio State University, 1583 Perry Street, Columbus, Ohio 43210
Knowledge and predictability of oxygenator performance is vital to safe and effective conduct of cardiopulmonary bypass. The determination of oxygenator performance in the laboratory, however, is carried out under a strict set of conditions established by the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation (AAMI). This performance data is oflimited value in the clinical setting where the perfusionist generally operates outside this set of parameters. This study (1) reports the laboratory performance characteristics of a hollow fiber membrane oxygenator (Sorin Monolyth), (2) uses this data to develop a model to predict performance under a wide range of clinical conditions, (3) compares predicted performance with clinical data collected at two open heart centers, and (4) reviews the complexities of comparing laboratory and clinical performance.
An in-vitro "oxygenator-deoxygenator" circuit was utilized to determine O2 and CO2 gas exchange, blood path pressure drop, and heat exchanger efficiency at a variety of blood and gas flows, under standard (AAMI) blood inlet conditions:
BF | 02(a) | 02(b) | 02(c) | CO2(a) | CO2(b) | CO2(c) | PD | Che |
3.0 | 210±7 | 196±8 | 177±6 | 109±4 | 186±8 | 237±8 | 29±8 | 0.67±0.03 |
4.0 | 264±13 | 241±18 | 226±10 | 147±8 | 246±13 | 300±17 | 44±10 | 0.59±0.04 |
5.0 | 326±15 | 307±10 | 272±7 | 174±4 | 285±7 | 356±7 | 48±10 | 0.55±0.02 |
where BF = blood flow rate (L/min); O2(a) = O2 transfer at FiO2 1.0 and Qg:Qb 1.0; O2(b) = O2 transfer at FiO2 0.8 and Qg:Qb 1.0;O2(c) = O2 transfer at FiO2 0.6 and Qg:Qb 1.0; CO2(a) = CO2 transfer at FiO2 1.0 and Qg:Qb 0.5; CO2(b) = CO2 transfer at Qg:Qb 1.0 and FiO2 1.0; CO2(c) = CO2 transfer at FiO2 1.0 and Qg:Qb 1.5 (all transfer values in ml/min); PD = blood path pressure drop (mmHg); Che = warming coefficient of heat exchange; values expressed as mean ± 1 SD
This laboratory performance data was compared to hospital and computer modeling data. Simple numerical comparison and analysis of variance of regression coefficients over groups indicated that some clinical parameters of performance (oxygen transfer and coefficient of heat exchange) were not predicted with the laboratory data. It is concluded that the laboratory performance data determined under strict controlled conditions may be of limited value in predicting clinical performance unless modeled to allow for variances in operating conditions.
Key words: evaluation, membrane oxygenator / gas transfer, carbon dioxide / gas transfer, oxygen / heat exchange efficiency / pressure drop
© 1994 AMSECT
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.