Issue |
J Extra Corpor Technol
Volume 27, Number 1, March 1995
|
|
---|---|---|
Page(s) | 24 - 28 | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/ject/199527124 | |
Published online | 18 August 2023 |
Original Article
Evaluation of Five In-Line Hematocrit Monitors
University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Perfusion Technology Program, Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Iowa City, Iowa
* Address correspondence to: Scott Niles, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Perfusion Technology Program, Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, 1600 JCP, Iowa City, IA 52242
Monitoring the hematocrit is essential during cardiopulmonary bypass for efficacious administration of blood products. The purpose of this study was to evaluate five cardiopulmonary bypass in-line monitors designed to display continuous hematocrit or hemoglobin values. The devices were evaluated for accuracy using an in vitro circuit primed with human blood while randomizing hematocrit, blood flow rate, and temperature. Hematocrits correlated significantly with the error in all the devices (p < 0.01). Over evaluation time, the error of the CDI, Gish, IBC, and MX2 increased significantly (p < 0.05). Temperature correlated significantly with the error of the Gish device (r = -0.49, p < 0.01). Blood flow correlated significantly with the Gish error (r = -0.24, p < 0.01). The Cobe device had a significantly smaller overall error than the other devices (p < 0.001). Device evaluation, based on a low mean error, a low percent error, a high correlation with the actual hematocrit, low correlations between mean error, blood flow, and temperature, and insignificant correlation between time and error, suggests that the Cobe device is more accurate for the continuous monitoring of hematocrit during cardiopulmonary bypass.
Key words: extracorporeal circulation / cardiopulmonary bypass monitor / accuracy / in vitro / hematocrit
© 1995 AMSECT
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.