Issue |
J Extra Corpor Technol
Volume 33, Number 2, June 2001
|
|
---|---|---|
Page(s) | 86 - 90 | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/ject/200133286 | |
Published online | 14 August 2023 |
Original Article
Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting With and Without Cardiopulmonary Bypass: A Comparison Analysis
Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
* Address correspondence to: Kelly C. Kirk, BS, CCP, Medical University of South Carolina, 1702 Foxridge Court, Charleston, SC 29414.
Received:
15
April
2000
Accepted:
2
February
2001
Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) using stabilization devices in place of the heart–lung machine is being performed on a wide range of patients. This study retrospectively compared the performance of off-pump coronary artery grafting bypass (OPCAB) with conventional bypass patients over the same 6-month period at The Medical University of South Carolina. Data were collected and compared from the National Cardiac Database of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS). Parameters studied included age, gender, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), previous myocardial infarction (MI), disease severity, number of grafts, complications, blood usage, ventilation times, operating room (OR) time, and hospital length of stay (LOS).
There were no significant difference between the patient groups with regard to age, gender, LVEF, previous MI, predicted mortality, and LOS. Operative mortality was also similar in the two groups: conventional bypass 4/117 (3%) and OPCAB 2/86 (2%). The conventional bypass patients (CPB) had significantly (p < 0.05) more diseased vessels (2.9 vs. 2.6) and distal grafts (4.1 vs. 2.7), as compared to the OPCAB group. OPCAB procedures resulted in significantly (p < 0.05) lower mean OR time (365 min vs. 406 min) and reduced mean postoperative ventilation hours (3.4 vs. 8.3 hours), as compared to conventional bypass. There were significantly (p < 0.05) fewer blood transfusions in the OPCAB group (1.1 units vs. 2.4 units), and the percentage of patients transfused blood was significantly less (34.9% vs. 57.3%). Nine out of 95 (9.5%) of patients who presented for OPCAB were converted to conventional bypass. Although there may be potential benefits to OPCAB, further studies must be directed at determining those patients who would benefit most from CABG using the off-pump technique.
Key words: cardiopulmonary bypass / off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery / beating heart surgery
© 2001 AMSECT
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.