Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: An Off-Pump versus On-Pump Review

Perfusion and Autotransfusion Unit, Department of Anaesthesia & Pain Management, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia

^* Address correspondence to: K. C. Potger, BSc, CCP, Perfusion and Autotransfusion Unit, Department of Anaesthesia & Pain Management, Royal North Shore Hospital, St. Leonards NSW 2065, Sydney, Australia, E-mail: webmaster@perfusion.com.au

Received: February 2002
Accepted: October 2002

Abstract

There has been a proliferation in the number of coronary artery bypass grafts (CABG) being performed without the use of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). However, the benefits of off-pump coronary artery grafting (OPCAB) are still being determined. The aim of this retrospective review was to compare the perioperative outcomes of CPB patients with OPCAB patients and to identify the patients most likely to benefit from the off-pump procedure. We reviewed the perioperative data of all isolated CABG patients at two metropolitan hospitals for the period of August 2000 to September 2001. The two groups (OPCAB vs. CPB) were further divided into subgroups identifying patients by their predicted mortality (higher-risk and lower-risk) and the number of distal graft anastomoses received (1, 2, 3, 4, or 5). A p value less than .05 was considered significant. Out of the total of 882 patients, 46.2% were OPCAB cases. Both CPB and OPCAB groups were similar in terms of demographics and predicted risk of mortality. Intraoperatively, OPCAB patients had fewer distal graft anastomoses (2.4 ± 1.0 vs. 3.2 ± 1.0, p < .001). Postoperatively, patients in the OPCAB group had less chest drainage (889 ± 588 vs. 989 ± 662 mls, p < .001), sustained fewer strokes (0.2 vs. 1.9%, p < .05), were transfused less (15.4 vs. 32.5%, p < .001) and were discharged earlier (7.3 ± 5.6 vs. 8.5 ± 9.1 days, p < .05). For higher-risk patients, OPCAB was associated with fewer reoperations for bleeding (1.3 vs. 6.4%, p < .05), a lower stroke rate (0 vs. 3.2%, p < .05), and a trend toward lower mortality (7.1 vs. 15.1%, p = .08). However, lower-risk OPCAB patients’ stroke incidences (0.5% OPCAB group vs. 1.4% CPB group), and mortality rates (0.5 vs. 0.5%) were similar. Comparisons by number of grafts performed revealed that only the single-grafted OPCAB patients had statistically fewer postoperative complications, reduced chest drainage, and a shorter intensive care stay. Differences between either operation groups in transfusion rates were only statistically significant for the one to three grafted patients, while postoperative stays were similar for patients having four grafts. These results suggest that OPCAB is associated with a reduction in mortality and morbidity, particularly within the higher-risk patients. However, the benefits of OPCAB diminished with an increasing number of distal anastomoses performed.