| Issue |
J Extra Corpor Technol
Volume 46, Number 1, March 2014
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Page(s) | 33 - 37 | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/ject/201446033 | |
| Published online | 15 March 2014 | |
Expert Reviews
Clinical Microsystems: A Critical Framework for Crossing the Quality Chasm
Department of Cardiac Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
Address correspondence to: Donald S. Likosky, PhD, Section Head, Section of Health Services Research and Quality, Department of Cardiac Surgery, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI 48109. E-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Received:
27
September
2013
Accepted:
4
February
2014
Abstract
Patients, payers, and the public have increased expectations concerning the quality, safety and costs of our health care delivery systems. Whether or not to redesign our complex delivery systems is no longer in question. In order to succeed in optimizing care and outcomes (clinical and financial) for our stakeholders, we must design and evaluate tests of change. This journey will require a fundamental shift in our traditional thinking about healthcare delivery systems, including how: (1) each of us relates (effectively or not) to one another, and (2) the value of our patient’s care is impacted accordingly. With this challenge in mind, this article will provide insight to the reader concerning clinical microsystems, small groups of professionals who work together on a regular basis to provide care to discrete populations of patients. The reader will learn how to leverage these microsystems to meet our stakeholders’ expectations, namely to optimize the quality, safety and costs of our health care delivery systems.
Key words: microsystems / quality improvement / quality of care
Presented at Winter Meeting Perfusion Downunder 2013, Hayman Island, Queensland, Australia, September 1–3, 2013.
The author has stated that he has reported no material, financial, or other relationship with any healthcare-related business or other entity whose products or services are discussed in this paper.
© 2014 AMSECT
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.
