Issue |
J Extra Corpor Technol
Volume 43, Number 3, September 2011
|
|
---|---|---|
Page(s) | 115 - 122 | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/ject/201143115 | |
Published online | 15 September 2011 |
Abstract
Microbubble Generation and Transmission of Medtronic’s Affinity Hardshell Venous Reservoir and Collapsible Venous Reservoir Bag: An In-Vitro Comparison
Address correspondence to: Kieron C. Potger, CCP, Perfusionist, Royal North Shore Hospital, Reserve Road, St. Leonards, NSW 2065 Australia . E-mail: webmaster@anzcp.org
Received:
31
January
2011
Accepted:
1
April
2011
Microemboli are implicated in neurological injury; therefore, the extracorporeal circuit (ECC) should not generate microbubbles or transmit introduced air. The venous reservoir is the first component in the ECC designed to remove introduced air. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relative safety of two kinds of adult venous reservoirs—the closed soft-shell venous reservoir (SSVR [Medtronic CBMVR 1600]) and the open hard-shell venous reservoir (HSVR [Affinity NT CVR])—in terms of microbubble generation and introduced air transmission. A recirculating in-vitro circuit was used to compare the two reservoirs with the SSVR further assessed in a fully closed or partially open state. Microbubbles were counted using a Hatteland CMD10 Doppler in the outflow of the reservoirs before (microbubble generation) and after infusing 20 mL/min of air into the venous line (microbubble transmission) while altering pump flow rates (3 L/min; 5 L/min) and reservoir prime (200 mL; 700 mL). Negligible bubble generation was noted in the SSVRs at both flow rates and either reservoir volume. However, microbubble generation was significant in the HSVR at the higher flow rate of 5 L/min and lower reservoir volume of 200 mL. When infusing air, a flow of 3 L/min was associated with insignificant to small increases in microbubble transmission for all reservoirs. Conversely, infusing air while flowing at 5 L/min was associated with significantly more microbubble transmission for all reservoirs at both low and high reservoir volumes. The SSVR is as safe as the HSVR in microbubble handling as the generation and transmission of microbubbles by the SSVR is not more than the HSVR over a range of prime volumes and flow rates. As both reservoirs transmitted microbubbles at higher pump flow rates regardless of reservoir volumes, it is important to eliminate venous air entrainment during cardiopulmonary bypass.
Key words: hard-shell venous reservoir / soft-shell venous reservoir / microbubbles
© 2011 AMSECT
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.