Issue |
J Extra Corpor Technol
Volume 30, Number 2, June 1998
|
|
---|---|---|
Page(s) | 64 - 72 | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/ject/199830264 | |
Published online | 18 August 2023 |
Original Article
The Efficacy and Safety of a Pharmacologic Protocol for Maintaining Coronary Artery Bypass Patients at a Higher Mean Arterial Pressure during Cardiopulmonary Bypass
Cornell Coronary Artery Bypass Outcomes Trial Group, New York Hospital-Cornell Medical Center, Department of Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, New York, New York
* Address correspondence to: Janey Peterson, RN, MA, New York Hospital-Cornell Medical Center, Box 46, 525 East 68th Street, New York, NY 10021
A recent randomized trial of higher versus lower mean arterial pressure (MAP) during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) showed that higher MAP on CPB was associated with a lower incidence of overall cardiac and neurologic morbidity and mortality in coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) patients. Cardiopulmonary bypass MAP was controlled pharmacologically while CPB flow was held constant for any given period. The objective of the present study was to assess the efficacy and safety of this pharmacologic protocol. Two hundred forty-eight patients participated in the study; the mean age was 65.8 ± 9.4 years, 20% were women, and the mean preoperative ejection fraction was 48%. The low-flow conrrected CPB MAP attained for the low and high MAP groups was 56.7 ± 5.0 mmHg and 77.7 ± 7.1 mmHg, respectively (p = 0.0001). Major cardiac and neurologic outcomes, postoperative blood loss, renal dysfunction, intensive care unit (ICU) stay, and duration of intubation were not found to be significantly associated with any drug in the pharmacologic protocol. These findings support that the pharmacologic protocol used to maintain CABG patients at higher MAP on CPB is both efficacious and safe.
Key words: cardiopulmonary bypass / coronary artery bypass surgery / mean arterial pressure / phenylephrine / sodium nitroprusside
© 1998 AMSECT
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.