Status of Pediatric Perfusion Education: 2000 Survey

Department of Cardiovascular Perfusion, Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York

^* Address correspondence to: Edward Darling, CCP, Upstate Medical University, 750 East Adams Street, Syracuse, NY 13210, darlinge@ssyrv4.upstate.edu

Received: 28 March 2001
Accepted: 21 October 2001

Abstract

In recent years, studies have raised questions about pediatric perfusion training, minimum proficiency requirements, and specialization. To understand these questions better, a survey was undertaken to investigate the status of pediatric/ neonatal perfusion training in the United States. Three groups were surveyed: program directors (PD), recent graduates of perfusion programs (RG), and pediatric cardiac anesthesiologists (PCA). Program directors and recent graduates were queried about didactic curriculum and clinical experiences. All three groups were asked core questions regarding minimum proficiency, specialization, and need for a postgraduate style program. Didactically, 65% of program directors believed that perfusion programs provided a solid introductory knowledge base in infant perfusion. Clinically, students performed an average of 124 ± 42.5 adult and 17 ± 12.9 pediatric cases during their education. Program directors cited numerous limitations to clinical pediatric education, including access to pediatric cases and allocation of resources. The PD (69%) and RG (96%) both believed graduates were less prepared to perform infant/pediatric cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) at graduation as compared to adult CPB. The opinions of all three groups were divided when asked whether the essentials and guidelines requirement for minimum pediatric caseload is too low (yes response: PD 52%, RG 73%, PCA 47%). The PD and RG were against pediatric subspecialization/certification (87%, 57% respectively); whereas, the PCA were unanimously in favor (100%) of pediatric subspecialization/ certification for perfusionist. All three groups felt a postgraduate-style program in infant perfusion would benefit the community (78%, 82%, 100%). Finally, 64% of RG said that, if available, they would have considered entering a training program in pediatric/neonatal perfusion after graduation. Our results indicate that there are still limitations to pediatric perfusion education. A postgraduate-style program in infant perfusion is one possible solution to this problem.