Issue |
J Extra Corpor Technol
Volume 43, Number 4, December 2011
|
|
---|---|---|
Page(s) | 227 - 231 | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/ject/201143227 | |
Published online | 15 December 2011 |
Original Articles
The Prognostic Value of Using the Duration of Acute Kidney Injury in Cardiac Surgery: An Example Using Two Antifibrinolytics
* The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Section of Cardiology Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center and Dartmouth Medical School, Lebanon, New Hampshire
† Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Maine Medical Center, Portland, Maine
‡ Department of Medicine, Clinical Epidemiology Research Center, West Haven, Connecticut
§ Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
Address correspondence to: Jeremiah R. Brown, PhD, MS, Clinical Research Section, Dartmouth–Hitchcock Medical Center, One Medical Center Drive, Lebanon, NH 03756. E-mail: jbrown@dartmouth.edu
Received:
27
May
2011
Accepted:
6
November
2011
Previously, we reported that the addition of duration to the Acute Kidney Injury Network (AKIN) definition of acute kidney injury (AKI) is a marker for more severe kidney injury and predicts long-term mortality. We aimed to evaluate an example of the utility of adding AKI duration to the AKIN definition by comparing the historical use of aprotinin with Amicar. In a single-center observational study, we followed 4987 consecutive patients undergoing cardiac surgery between 2002 and 2007 for postsurgery AKI. Patients with a history of hemodialysis were excluded. Duration of AKI was calculated by the number of days AKI was present as defined by a ≥0.3 (mg/dL) or a ≥50% increase in serum creatinine from baseline or new onset of acute dialysis. Kaplan-Meier and Cox’s proportional hazard modeling was conducted to evaluate 5-year mortality. Fifty-three percent of patients received Amicar (n = 2333) and 47% received high-dose aprotinin (n = 2093). Patients receiving aprotinin had evidence of more advanced disease and comorbidity and were more likely to develop AKI and have longer durations of AKI than Amicar (p < .001): 7.0 ± 11.5 vs. 3.8 ± 6.0 days (p < .001). Nearest-neighbor propensity matching demonstrated aprotinin had significantly worse 5-year mortality compared with Amicar (relative risk [RR] = 2.09, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.65–2.65). AKI duration added to the AKIN definition of AKI may provide the necessary sensitivity and specificity for evaluating renal outcomes in clinical trials.
Key words: acute kidney injury / Amicar / aprotinin / cardiac outcomes / cardiopulmonary bypass
© 2011 AMSECT
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.