J Extra Corpor Technol
Volume 52, Number 1, March 2020
|Page(s)||7 - 12|
|Published online||15 March 2020|
Incident Reporting in Perfusion: Current Perceptions on PIRS-2
* Green Lane Cardiothoracic Unit, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand; and Department of Anaesthesiology, School of Medicine, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
† Cardiac and Thoracic Surgery Unit, Flinders Medical Centre, Adelaide, South Australia; College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Address correspondence to: Timothy W. Willcox, CCP, Green Lane Cardiothoracic Unit, Auckland City Hospital, 2 Park Road, Grafton, Auckland 1023, New Zealand. E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org
Accepted: 13 January 2020
The Australia and New Zealand College of Perfusionists’ (ANZCP) Perfusion Incident Reporting System was established in 1998 and has evolved to an open access on-line incident perfusion reporting system (PIRS-2). Changes were made to PIRS-2 to promote learning from what went well in unexpected situations. A 9-question survey was e-mailed to the PIRS-2 contact group to elicit feedback on attitudes to voluntarily reporting perfusion-related incidents and near-miss events to PIRS-2. In August 2019, a 9-question survey using SurveyMonkey® (San Mateo Ca) was e-mailed to 198 perfusionists currently on the ANZCP PIRS-2 e-mail contacts group. Responses for all responding practicing perfusionists were totaled and expressed as a percentage of the total number of respondents. The respondents were then grouped by region and responses were expressed as a percentage of respondents from each region as well as for grouped responses from Australia/New Zealand (ANZ) and non-ANZ respondents. The response rate was 49.5% with 95 practicing perfusionists completing the survey. In the 12 months before the survey, 22% of respondents had submitted reports to PIRS-2, whereas 79% had read e-mailed reports. Unit culture was the most frequently cited barrier to reporting from all respondents (19%; 0% to 40% by region). Twenty-five percentage of Australian respondents cited unit culture as a barrier to reporting vs. 0% of New Zealand respondents. A combination of concern of discovery and identification of region ranked second as a barrier for 17% of all respondents. The open access ANZCP PIRS-2 voluntary incident reporting in perfusion was widely viewed as relevant and beneficial to both individual practice and to team performance. A high likelihood to considering reporting incidents is tempered by the well-established barriers of ease of the reporting system, the fix and forget phenomenon, concerns of discovery, and a defensive unit culture.
Key words: safety / perfusion / cardiopulmonary bypass / incidents / reporting
© 2020 AMSECT
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.