Open Access
Issue
J Extra Corpor Technol
Volume 57, Number 1, March 2025
Page(s) 38 - 41
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/ject/2025003
Published online 07 March 2025

© The Author(s), published by EDP Sciences, 2025

Licence Creative CommonsThis is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Overview

Even in cases occurring within hospitals, survival rates following extended cardiac arrest are low. A multicenter study examining 348,996 intra-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) incidents discovered that less than 2.5% of patients experienced favorable outcomes after receiving CPR for over 40 min in shockable rhythm scenarios [1].

IHCA in the operating room is uncommon, occurring at a rate of 3 per 10,000 anesthetics in the UK. However, if it persists for more than 5–10 min, managing the situation becomes significantly more complex and often results in a poorer prognosis [2].

To enhance survival rates and minimize neurological impairment, it is crucial to identify the issue, intervene promptly, systematically address reversible causes, and, in prolonged cases, evaluate the use of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) or ECMO in some situations, as recommended by Stanford Cognitive Aids for Perioperative Crisis guidelines [3]. However, what actions can be taken if spontaneous circulation does not resume after several minutes and ECMO or CPB are unavailable?

In the United Kingdom, just 9% of centers involved in analyzing intra-operative cardiac arrest (as part of the 7th National Audit Project by the Royal College of Anaesthetists) had ECMO available. Moreover, only 9 out of 548 patients received ECMO support [2]. A potential solution could be to activate a mobile ECMO team. A 2023 review comparing ECPR with manual or mechanical CPR during cardiac arrest found 3 trials, 27 observational studies, and 6 cost-effectiveness analyses, indicating the potential benefits of ECPR [4].

The survival advantage of open-chest CPR (OCCPR) compared to closed-chest CPR (CCCPR) remains uncertain. CCCPR is the standard practice [5], however, European guidelines advise considering open-chest cardiac massage during a peri-operative cardiac arrest if ROSC cannot be achieved through closed compressions and ECPR is not available [6].

Trauma does not rule out the use of ECMO, which has been utilized more frequently in this situation. Advances in anticoagulation and technology strive to reduce associated complications. While formal guidelines have yet to be established, clinicians recognize its potential life-saving benefits for critically injured patients [7].

At the moment of establishing a “system” for a situation like this, Germany’s Düsseldorf ECLS Network offers advanced mechanical support for critically ill patients at multiple centers. Of the 160 patients, 102 received ECMO during cardiac arrest, with a 34% survival rate to discharge [8]. The rendezvous model strategy aims to enhance patient outcomes by initiating ECMO support earlier in the prehospital environment, utilizing a central hub that serves multiple centers, and then back to a central ECMO hospital once cannulated. This approach necessitates extensive planning, logistics, and collaboration among various institutions [9]. A cannulation team in Southern California successfully transported patients requiring ECMO support. This included several ECPR cases involving drug overdoses and refractory arrhythmias [10].

Description

A 34-year-old male patient with no significant past medical history presented to the emergency department of a public hospital in Chile, shortly after a traffic collision. The patient presented with blunt chest trauma, including left hemopneumothorax, multiple rib and sternal fractures, thoracic vertebral fractures (T1; T4-T8), an open fracture of the left wrist and a fracture of the left elbow. Additionally, blunt abdominal trauma led to a splenic injury. Consequently, DVT prophylaxis was not indicated.

Upon hospital arrival, a pleurostomy was performed but was found to be ineffective, with impaction into the lung parenchyma and no air or blood was drained. Due to reasons beyond the medical team’s control, surgical removal of this tube and drainage of hemopneumothorax was planned seven days after admission. The patient at that time was in good general condition, hemodynamically stable with no vasoactive drugs, spontaneous ventilation, with no O2 required.

At the beginning of the surgery, the patient unexpectedly experienced loss of the capnography waveform. While investigating the cause, the patient developed ventricular fibrillation (VF), followed by asystole. The surgical procedure was immediately halted and the patient was placed in the supine position. Following confirmation of pulselessness, CPR was initiated according to established protocols. A thoracotomy was performed to rule out cardiac tamponade, and internal cardiac massage was initiated, followed by direct defibrillation. The rhythm converted to pulseless electrical activity and kept mainly that pattern.

Echocardiography revealed enlargement of the right heart chamber, suggesting pulmonary thromboembolism. The clinical symptoms further supported this diagnosis.

Due to prolonged unresponsive cardiac arrest and the absence of ROSC, the nearest ECMO Team was contacted after 18 min of cardiac arrest. Arterial blood gas control showed metabolic acidosis (pH 7.12). Considering that arrest was witnessed, initial VF rhythm, patient′s age, and no identifiable irreversible condition, following unsuccessful CPR, ECMO support was initiated after 81 min of uninterrupted resuscitation measures. Cannulation was performed via the right femoral vein (29 Fr cannula) and the left femoral artery (17 Fr cannula) with a distal reperfusion catheter (7 Fr) (Fig. 1). An EUROSETS ECMO Adult polymethylpentene fiber oxygenator (Eurosets, Medolla, Italy) and a ROTAFLOW I Centrifugal pump (Getinge, Gothenburg, Sweden) were used. The patient was subsequently transferred to our ECMO team center.

thumbnail Figure 1

ECPR CANNULATION in the operating room the patient presented the arrest and the ECMO team came in, reevaluated the situation and proceeded to go on with cannulation.

Mild therapeutic hypothermia was administered for 16 h and was later reversed. Upon confirmation of the neurological integrity, the patient was extubated.

After 24 h of ECMO support, pulmonary angiography excluded a massive pulmonary embolism (Fig. 2). However, segmental thrombosis in the right internal saphenous vein was identified on Doppler ultrasound.

thumbnail Figure 2

Pulmonary angiography (24 h after Cardiac arrest), no pulmonary emboli was identified.

ECMO support was successfully weaned after 50 h, and an inferior vena cava filter was placed to prevent further embolization (Fig. 3).

thumbnail Figure 3

Case timeline.

The patient was discharged from the hospital after 64 days of stance with no neurological sequelae and physical therapy to recover functional capacity.

This case report highlights the unique combination of mobile extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR), direct cardiac massage and prolonged resuscitation. Successful ECPR requires a well-coordinated multidisciplinary team, optimal patient selection, adequate resources, interinstitutional collaboration and timely intervention.

Comment

In cases of in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA), the decision to withdraw resuscitation should not rely solely on the elapsed time. Several factors warrant consideration, including patient age, reversibility of cardiac arrest, initial rhythm, underlying medical conditions, resuscitation quality, and CPR response.

In this specific case, prompt and effective resuscitation efforts coupled with early consideration of ECMO, timely cannulation and transfer to a specialized center contributed to a successful outcome.

This case report underscores the potential life – saving benefits of a rapid and aggressive multidisciplinary approach, including mobile ECPR and prolonged direct cardiac massage in patients with refractory cardiac arrest, highlighting the uniqueness of this rare combination. While further research is needed to validate these findings, our experience suggests that strategy may offer hope and expand the therapeutic window for patients with otherwise unsurvivable cardiac arrest in a center without an ECMO program.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific funding.

Conflicts of interest

None.

Data availability statement

All available data are incorporated into the article.

Author contribution statement

RD, CGK, CAN, and DGG participated directly in the clinical case study and wrote the first version. GBG and LFR performed the reference analysis and all authors contributed to the final version.

Ethics approval

A case report consent form was also obtained from the patient. This paper was presented prior to publication to the Local Ethics Committee (Clinica Red Salud Santiago).

References

  1. Okubo M, Komukai S, Andersen LW, et al. Duration of cardiopulmonary resuscitation and outcomes in adults with in-hospital cardiac arrest: a retrospective cohort study. BMJ. 2024;384:e076019. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Nolan JP, Armstrong RA, Kane AD, Kursumovic E, Davies MT, Moppett IK, Cook TM, Soar J, NAP7 Collaborators. Advanced life support interventions during intra-operative cardiac arrest among adults as reported to the 7th National Audit Project of the Royal College of Anaesthetists. Anaesthesia. 2024;79:914–923. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Stanford University School of Medicine. (V4.4 2022.). Cognitive aids for perioperative crisis emergency manual [PDF]. Stanford University. Retrieved November 25, 2024, from https://web.stanford.edu/dept/anesthesia/em/epic-manual.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  4. Holmberg MJ, Granfeldt A, Guerguerian AM, et al. Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for cardiac arrest: an updated systematic review. Resuscitation. 2023;182:109665. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Wang M, Lu X, Gong P, Zhong Y, Gong D, Song Y. Open-chest cardiopulmonary resuscitation versus closed-chest cardiopulmonary resuscitation in patients with cardiac arrest: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2019;27(1):116. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hinkelbein J, Andres J, Bottiger BW, et al. Cardiac arrest in the perioperative period: a consensus guideline for identification, treatment, and prevention from the European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care and the European Society for Trauma and Emergency Surgery. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2023;40:724–736. https://doi.org/10.1097/EJA.0000000000001813. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Zhang Y, Zhang L, Huang X, Ma N, Wang P, Li L, Chen X, Ji X. ECMO in adult patients with severe trauma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Med Res. 2023;28(1):412. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Aubin H, Petrov G, Dalyanoglu H, et al. Four-year experience of providing mobile extracorporeal life support to out-of-center patients within a suprainstitutional network-Outcome of 160 consecutively treated patients. Resuscitation. 2017;121:151–157. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Song C, Dennis M, Burns B, et al. Improving access to extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for out of hospital cardiac arrest: pre-hospital ECPR and alternate delivery strategies. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2022;30(1):77. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hadaya J, Sanaiha Y, Gudzenko V, Qadir N, Singh S, Nsair A, Cho NY, Shemin RJ, Benharash P, Anderson I, Bland S. Implementation and outcomes of an urban mobile adult extracorporeal life support program. JTCVS Tech. 2022;12:78–92. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Cite this article as: Alejandro Díaz Gómez R, Alvarado Neves C, Gloria Karlezi de la Fuente C, Cecilia Bejarano Alva G, Garcia Gomez D & Fernanda Rodas García L. A case of intraoperative arrest & mobile ECMO. J Extra Corpor Technol 2025, 57, 38–41. https://doi.org/10.1051/ject/2025003.

All Figures

thumbnail Figure 1

ECPR CANNULATION in the operating room the patient presented the arrest and the ECMO team came in, reevaluated the situation and proceeded to go on with cannulation.

In the text
thumbnail Figure 2

Pulmonary angiography (24 h after Cardiac arrest), no pulmonary emboli was identified.

In the text
thumbnail Figure 3

Case timeline.

In the text

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.