Open Access
Table 1
Comparison of cardiac index (CI) for a one-hour clamp flash trial with a 3.5-minute clamping period versus a continuous low flow trial for a hypothetical adult and pediatric patient. Note: Percent decrease in total support – L/min and time is a comparison between continuous low flow and clamp flash trials.
| Weight (kg) | BSA (m2) | Trial type | CI during flow (L/mim/m2) | Flow rate (L/min) | Total support (L/h) | % Decrease in total support (L/h) | Supported time (min) | % Decrease in support minutes (L/h) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adult | 80 | 2 | Continuous low flow | 0.5 | 1 | 60 | – | 60 | – |
| 80 | 2 | Clamp flash | 0.3 | 0.6 | 9 | 85 | 7.5 | 88 | |
| Pediatric | 4 | 0.48 | Continuous low flow | 0.25 | 0.12 | 7.2 | – | 60 | – |
| 4 | 0.48 | Clamp flash | 0.29 | 0.14 | 1 | 86 | 7.5 | 88 |
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.