Free Access
Issue
J Extra Corpor Technol
Volume 37, Number 4, December 2005
Page(s) 377 - 380
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/ject/200537377
Published online 15 December 2005
  1. Scuderi PE, MacGregor DA, Bowton DL, James RL. A laboratory comparison of three pulmonary artery oximetry catheters. Anesthesiology. 1994;81:245–53. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Fried DW, Leo JJ, Mattioni GJ, et al. CDI Blood Parameter Monitoring System 500Ua new tool for the clinical perfusionist. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2000;32:25–30. [Google Scholar]
  3. Southworth R, Sutton R, Mize S, et al. Clinical evaluation of a new in-line continuous blood gas monitor. J Extra Corpor Technol. 1998;4:166–70. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Trowbridge CC, Vasquez M, Stammers AH, et al. The effects of continuous blood gas monitoring during cardiopulmonary bypass: A prospective, randomized study—part I. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2000;32:120–8. [Google Scholar]
  5. Council of Europe. Guide to the Preparation. Use and Quality Assurance of Blood Components. 10th ed. Strasbourg, France: Council of Europe Publishing. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.