Open Access
J Extra Corpor Technol
Volume 38, Number 1, March 2006
Page(s) 38 - 43
Published online 15 March 2006
  1. Hopkins KD. Educational and Psychological Measurement and Evaluation. 8th ed. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon; 1998. [Google Scholar]
  2. D’Costa AG. The validity of credentialing examinations. Evaluat Health Professions. 1986;9:137–69. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Jonassen DH, Rohrer-Murphy L. Activity theory as a framework for designing constructivist learning environments. Education Technology Research and Development. 1999;47:61–79. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Terry MA. Writing a multiple-choice test question. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 1992;92:112–4. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Toth LS. From vision, to here, to where? J Extra Corpor Technol. 1989;21:40–51. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  6. Angoff WH. Scales, norms and equivalents scores. In: Thorndike RL, ed. Educational measurement. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: American Council of Education 1971:580–600. [Google Scholar]
  7. Frankenberg D, Foegelle W. Developing a perfusion technology curriculum using the DACUM process. J Extra Corpor Technol. 1983;14:97–100. [Google Scholar]
  8. Flanagan JC. The critical incident technique. Psychol Bull. 1954;5:327–58. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Schuwirth LWT, van der Vleuten CPM, Donkers HHLM. A closer look at cueing effects in multiple-choice questions. Med Educ. 1996;30:44–9. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Stammers AH. Perfusion education in the United States at the turn of the century. J Extra Corpor Technol. 1999;31:112–7. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. McCrea C. The quality delivery process: a useful framework for quality improvement initiatives in training? Med Teacher. 1996;18:300–3. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Dolmans DHJM, Wolfhagen HAP, Scherpbier AJJA. From quality assurance to total quality management: How can quality assurance result in continuous improvement in health professions education? Educ Health. 2003;16:17–21. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.