EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 38 / No 2 (June 2006) J Extra Corpor Technol, 38 2 (2006) 112-115 References
Free Access
Editorial
Issue
J Extra Corpor Technol
Volume 38, Number 2, June 2006
Page(s) 112 - 115
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/ject/200638112
Published online 15 June 2006
  1. The White House. State of the Union. Accessed 2006 at (http://www.whitehouse.gov/stateoftheunion/2005/). [Google Scholar]
  2. Fisher ES, Wennberg DE, Stukel TA, et al. The implications of regional variations in Medicare spending. Part 2: Health outcomes and satisfaction with care. Ann Intern Med. 2003;138:288–98. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Gardner TJ, Horneffer PJ, Manolio TA, et al. Stroke following coronary artery bypass grafting: A ten-year study. Ann Thorac Surg. 1985;40:574–81. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Charlesworth DC, Likosky DJ, Marrin CA, et al. Development and validation of a prediction model for strokes after coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg. 2003;76:436–43. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Pearson K. Report on certain enteric fever inoculation statistics. BMJ. 1904;3:1243–6. [Google Scholar]
  6. Parolari A, Alamanni F, Polvani G, et al. Meta-analysis of randomized trials comparing off-pump with on-pump coronary bypass graft patency. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005;80:2121–5. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Khan NE, De Souza A, Mister R, et al. A randomized comparison of off-pump and on-pump multivessel coronary-artery bypass surgery. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:21–8. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Widimsky P, Straka Z, Stros P, et al. One-year coronary bypass graft patency: a randomized comparison between off-pump and on-pump surgery angiographic results of the PRAGUE-4 trial. Circulation. 2004;110:3418–23. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Eagle KA, Guyton RA, Davidoff R, et al. ACC/AHA Guidelines for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Revise the 1991 Guidelines for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery). American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999;34:1262–347. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Bartels C, Gerdes A, Babin-Ebell J, et al. Cardiopulmonary bypass: Evidence or experience based? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2002;124:20–7. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Shann KG, Likosky DS, Murkin JM, et al. An evidence-based review of the practice of cardiopulmonary bypass in adults: A focus on neurological injury, glycemic control, hemodilution and the inflammatory response. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. (in press). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.