EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 39 / No 2 (June 2007) J Extra Corpor Technol, 39 2 (2007) 75-80 References
Free Access
Issue
J Extra Corpor Technol
Volume 39, Number 2, June 2007
Page(s) 75 - 80
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/ject/200739075
Published online 15 June 2007
  1. Sellke FW, DiMaio JM, Caplan LR, et al. American Heart Association Comparing on-pump and off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: Numerous studies but few conclusions: A scientific statement from the American Heart Association council on cardiovascular surgery and anesthesia in collaboration with the interdisciplinary working group on quality of care and outcomes research. Circulation. 2005;111:2858–64. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Benetti FJ. Direct coronary surgery with saphenous vein bypass without either cardiopulmonary bypass or cardiac arrest. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 1985;26:217–22. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cooley DA. Con: Beating heart-surgery for coronary revascularizations: Is it the most important development since the heart-lung machine? Ann Thorac Surg. 2000;70:1779–81. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Jegaden O, Mikaeloff P. Off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery. The beginning of the end? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2001;19:237–8. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Lingaa PS, Hol PK, Lundblad R, et al. Clinical and angiographic outcome of coronary surgery with and without cardiopulmonary bypass: A prospective randomized trial. Heart Surg Forum. 2004;7:96–100. [Google Scholar]
  6. Khan NE, De Souza A, Mister R, et al. A randomized comparison of off-pump and on-pump multivessel coronary-artery bypass surgery. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:21–8. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Wolfe JA. The coronary artery bypass conduit. II. Assessment of the quality of the distal anastomosis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001;72:S2253–9. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Straka Z, Widimsky P, Jirasek K, et al. Off-pump versus on-pump coronary surgery: Final results from a prospective randomized study PRAGUE-4. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004;77:789–93. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Bergsland J, Hasnain S, Lajos TZ, Salerno TA. Elimination of cardiopulmonary bypass: A prime goal in reoperative coronary artery bypass surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1998;14:59–63. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Bergsland J, D’Ancona G, Karamanoukian HL, Ricci M, Schmid S, Salerno TA. Technical tips and pitfalls in OPCAB surgery: The Buffalo experience. Heart Surg Forum. 2000;3:189–93. [Google Scholar]
  11. Puskas JD, Williams WH, Duke PG, et al. Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting provides complete revascularization with reduced myocardial injury, transfusion requirements, and length of stay: A prospective randomized comparison of two hundred unselected patients undergoing off-pump versus conventional coronary artery bypass grafting. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003;125:797–808. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Cleveland JC, Shroyer AL, Chen AY, Peterson E, Grover FL. Offpump coronary artery bypass grafting decreases risk-adjusted mortality and morbidity. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001;72:1282–9. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Plomondon ME, Cleveland JC, Ludwig ST, et al. Off-pump coronary artery bypass is associated with improved risk-adjusted outcomes. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001;72:114–9. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Racz MJ, Hannan EL, Isom OW, et al. A comparison of short- and long-term outcomes after off-pump and on-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery with sternotomy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;43:557–64. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Nathoe HM, van Dijk D, Jansen EW, et al. Octopus Study Group. A comparison of on-pump and off-pump coronary bypass surgery in low-risk patients. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:394–402. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Walpoth BH, Muller MF, Genyk I, et al. Evaluation of coronary bypass flow with color-Doppler and magnetic resonance imaging techniques: Comparison with intraoperative flow measurements. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1999;15:795–802. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Takami T, Ina H. Relation of intraoperative flow measurement with postoperative quantitative angiographic assessment of coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001;72:1270–4. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Louagie YAG, Brockman CE, Jamart J, et al. Pulsed Doppler intraoperative flow assessment and midterm coronary graft patency. Ann Thorac Surg. 1998;66:1282–8. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Barner HB. Techniques of myocardial revascularization In: Munds LHJr, ed. Cardiac Surgery in the Adult. New York, NY: McGraw Hill; 1997;500–2. [Google Scholar]
  20. Ki-Bong K, Cheong L, Cheul L, et al. Off-pump coronary bypass may decrease patency of saphenous vein grafts. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001;72:S1033–7. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Rasmussen C, Thiis J, Clemmensen P, et al. Significance and management of early graft failure after coronary artery bypass grafting: Feasibility and results of acute angiography and revascularization. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1977;12:847–52. [Google Scholar]
  22. Golman S, Copland J, Morritz T. Improvement in early saphenous vein graft patency after coronary artery bypass surgery with antiplatelet therapy: Results of a Veterans administration cooperative study. Circulation. 1998;77:1324–32. [Google Scholar]
  23. Beldi G, Bosshard A, Hess OM, Althaus U, Walpoth BH. Transit time flow measurement: Experimental validation and comparison of three different systems. Ann Thorac Surg. 2000;70:212–7. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. D’Ancona G, Karamanoukian HL, Ricci M, Bergsland J, Salerno TA. Graft patency verification in coronary artery bypass grafting: Principles and clinical applications of transit time flow measurement. Angiology. 2000;51:725–31. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Canver CC, Cooler D, Murray EL, et al. Clinical importance of measuring coronary graft flows in the revascularized heart: Ultasonic or electromagnetic? J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 1997;38:211–15. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Jaber SF, Koenig SC, Bhasker Rao B, Van Himbergen DJ, Spence PA. Can visual assessment of flow wave form morphology detect anastomoticerror in off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1998;14:476–9. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. D’Ancona G. Intraoperative graft patency verification: Should you trust your fingertips? Heart Surg Forum. 2000;3:99–102. [Google Scholar]
  28. Walpoth BH, Bosshard A, Genyk I, et al. Transit-time flow measurements for detection of early graft failure during myocardial revascularization. Ann Thorac Surg. 1998;66:1097–100. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. Morota T, et al. Interoperative evaluation of coronary anastomosis br transit time ultra sonic flow measurment. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002;73:1446–50. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. Kjaergaard HK, Irmukhamedov A, Christensen JB, Schmidt TA. Flow in coronary bypass conduits on-pump and off-pump. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004;78:2054–6. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. Schmitz C, Ashraf O, Schiller W, et al. Transit time flow measurement in on-pump and off-pump coronary artery surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003;126:645–50. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. Hu S, Wang X, Song Y, Lu F. Graft patency in off-pump and conventional coronary artery bypass grafting for treatment of triple vessel coronary disease. Chin Med J (Engl). 2003;116:436–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Louagie YAG, Jamart J, Gruslin A. Do coronary bypass graft flows differ between on-pump and off-pump operations? Ann Thorac Surg. 2005;79:2004–12. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.