Free Access
Issue |
J Extra Corpor Technol
Volume 39, Number 3, September 2007
|
|
---|---|---|
Page(s) | 142 - 157 | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/ject/200739142 | |
Published online | 15 September 2007 |
- Society of Clinical Perfusion Scientists of Great Britain and Ireland. Recommendations for Standards of Monitoring and Alarms During Cardiopulmonary Bypass. Society of Clinical Perfusion Scientists of Great Britain and Ireland; 1988 Available at: http://www.sopgbi.org/perfusionists.html. Accessed July 9, 2007. [Google Scholar]
- American Society of Extra-Corporeal Technology. AmSECT Guidelines for Perfusion Practice. American Society of Extra-Corporeal Technology; 1998 Available at: http://www.amsect.org/index.html. Accessed July 9, 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Australasian Society of Cardio-Vascular Perfusionists. Standards of Clinical Practice of Perfusion for Cardiopulmonary Bypass. Australasian Society of Cardio-Vascular Perfusionists; 2000 Available at: http://www.anzcp.org/Documents/ANZCP%20Regulations.pdf. Accessed July 9, 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Stoney W, Alford WCJ, Burrus G, Glassford DJ, Thomas CJ. Air embolism and other accidents using pump oxygenators. Ann Thorac Surg. 1980;29:336–40. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Wheeldon D. Can cardiopulmonary bypass be a safe procedure? In: Longmore DB, ed. Towards Safer Cardiac Surgery. Lancaster, UK: MTP; 1981;427–46. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Wheeldon D. Proceedings of the First World Congress on Open-Heart Technology. London, UK: Franklin Scientific Projects; 1982. [Google Scholar]
- Kurusz M, Conti V, Arens J, Brown J, Faulkner S, Manning J. Perfusion accident survey. Proc Am Acad Cardiovasc Perfusion. 1986;7:57–65. [Google Scholar]
- Jenkins O, Morris R, Simpson J. Australasian perfusion incident survey. Perfusion. 1997;12:279–88. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mejak B, Stammers A, Rauch E, Vang S, Viessman T. A retrospective study on perfusion incidents and safety devices. Perfusion. 2000;15:51–61. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Palanzo D. Perfusion safety: Defining the problem. Perfusion. 2005;20:195–203. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- ANAES, ed. Recommandations Concernant le Monitorage et les Dispositifs de Sécurité Pour la Circulation Extracorporelle en Chirurgie Cardiaque. ANAES; 2004 Available at: http://www.has-sante.fr (http://www.has-sante.fr/portail/upload/docs/application/pdf/circulation-extracorporelle_chirurgie_cardiaque_rap.pdf). Accessed July 9, 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Annuaire des centres de chirurgie cardiaque et thoracique. Saint Max, France: Editions Axis; 2005. [Google Scholar]
- Charriere J, Durand C, Mandon N, Le Guen A, Jayle C, Debaene B. Enquête française sur les dispositifs de surveillance de la CEC en 2001. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 2003;22:414–20. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Meilhan E, Merian L, Guespin A, et al. Pratique de la CEC dans l’Ouest de la France: résultats d’une enquête pour l’année 1989. Les Cahiers du CECEC. 1990;33:55–62. [Google Scholar]
- Ruchat P, Hurni M, Stumpe F, Fischer A, von Segesser L. Acute ascending aortic dissection complicating open heart surgery: cerebral perfusion defines the outcome. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1998;14:449–52. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Myers G, Weighell P, McCloskey B, Holt A, McTeer S, Maxwell S. A multicenter investigation into the occurrence of high-pressure excursions. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2003;35:127–32. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fisher A, Baker M, Buffin M, et al. Normal and abnormal trans-oxygenator pressure gradients during cardiopulmonary bypass. Perfusion. 2003;18:25–30. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Groom RC, Froebe S, Martin J, et al. Update on pediatric perfusion practice in North America: 2005 Survey. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2005;37:343–54. [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.