EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 39 / No 3 (September 2007) J Extra Corpor Technol, 39 3 (2007) 183-187 References
Free Access
Issue
J Extra Corpor Technol
Volume 39, Number 3, September 2007
Page(s) 183 - 187
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/ject/200739183
Published online 15 September 2007
  1. Springer P, Payne K, Petermann B. Rating nursing performance based on behaviors. J Nurs Adm. 1998;28:39–45. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. McCrea C. The quality delivery process: A useful framework for quality improvement initiatives in training? Med Teach. 1996;18:300–3. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Dolmans DHJM, Wolfhagen HAP, Scherpbier AJJA. From quality assurance to total quality management: How can quality assurance result in continuous improvement in health professions education? Education for Health: Change in Learning and Practice. 2003;16:210–17. [Google Scholar]
  4. Latham GP, Wexley KN. Increasing Productivity Through Performance Appraisal. 2nd ed. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing; 1994. [Google Scholar]
  5. Levine EL, Ash RA, Bennett N. Exploratory comparative study of four job analysis methods. J Appl Psychol. 1980;65:524–35. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Smith P, Kendall LM. Retranslation of expectations: An approach to the construction of unambiguous anchors for rating scales. J Appl Psychol. 1963;47:149–55. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Morrison GR, Ross SM, Kemp JE. Designing Effective Instruction. 4th ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons; 2004. [Google Scholar]
  8. Hanser LM. Traditional and Cognitive Job Analyses as Tools for Understanding the Skills Gap. Berkeley, CA: National Center for Research in Vocational Education, University of California; 1995. [Google Scholar]
  9. Grunwald T, Clark D, Fisher SS, McLaughlin M, Narayanan S, Piepol D. Using cognitive task analysis to facilitate collaboration in development of simulator to accelerate surgical training. 2003 Available at http://www.iml.annenberg.edu/downloads/showcase_articles/grunwald_article1.pdf. Accessed Feb. 14, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  10. Austin JT, Villanova P. The criterion problem: 1917–1992. J Appl Psychol. 1992;77:836–74. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Flanagan JC. The critical incident technique. Psychol Bull. 1954;5:327–58. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Snell L, Tallen S, Haist S, et al. A review of the evaluation of clinical teaching: new perspectives and challenges. Med Educ. 2000;34:862–70. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hamdy H, Williams R, Tekian A, Benjamin S, El Shazali H, Bandaranayake R. Application of “VITALS”: Visual indicators of teaching and learning success in reporting student evaluations of clinical teachers. Education for Health. 2001;14:267–76. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Archer S. Are you the ideal clinical instructor? AmSECT Today. 2005;10:5. [Google Scholar]
  15. Witkin BR, Altshuld JW. Planning and Conducting Needs Assessments: A Practical Guide. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 1995. [Google Scholar]
  16. Osgood CE, Suci GJ, Tannenbaum PH. The Measurement of Meaning. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press; 1957. [Google Scholar]
  17. Doque G. Web-based evaluation of medical clerkships: A new approach to immediacy and efficacy of feedback and assessment. Med Teach. 2003;25:510–4. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.