Free Access
Issue
J Extra Corpor Technol
Volume 41, Number 2, June 2009
Page(s) 57 - 63
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/ject/200941057
Published online 15 June 2009
  1. Gibbon JHJr. Artificial maintenance of circulation during experimental occlusion of the pulmonary artery. Arch Surg. 1937;34:1105–31. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Gibbon JHJr. Application of a mechanical heart and lung apparatus to cardiac surgery. Minn Med. 1954;37:171–85. [Google Scholar]
  3. Kirklin JW, DuShane JW, Patrick RT, et al. Intracardiac surgery with the aid of a mechanical pump-oxygenator system (Gibbon type): Report of eight cases. Proc Staff Meet Mayo Clin. 1955;30:201–6. [Google Scholar]
  4. Miller BJ, Gibbon JH, Fineburg C. An improved mechanical heart and lung apparatus: Its use during open cardiotomy in experimental animals. Med Clin North Am. 1953;1:1603–24. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cross ES, Berne RM, Hirose Y. Evaluation of a rotating disc type oxygenator. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1956;93:210–4. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. DeWall RA, Gott VL, Lillehei CW, et al. A simple, expendable, artificial oxygenator for open heart surgery. Surg Clin North Am. 1956;36:1025–34. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Burns N. Production of a silicone rubber film for the membrane lung. Biomed Eng. 1969;4:356–9. [Google Scholar]
  8. Wiklund ME. Eleven keys to designing error-resistant medical devices. Medical Device and Diagnostic Industry. 2002:86–88. [Google Scholar]
  9. Kaye R, Crowley J. Medical Device Use Safety: Incorporating Human Factors Engineering into Risk Management. Guidance for Industry and FDA Premarked and Design Control Reviewers. Rockville, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Division of Device User Programs and Systems Analysis, Office of Health Industry Programs; 2000. [Google Scholar]
  10. Palanzo D. Perfusion safety: Defining the problem. Perfusion. 2005;20:195–203. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Mejak BL, Stammers AH, Rauch E, Vang S, Viessman T. A retrospective study on perfusion incidents and safety devices. Perfusion. 2000;15:51–61. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Stammers AH, Mejak BL. An update on perfusion safety: Does the type of perfusion practice affect the rate of incidents related to cardiopulmonary bypass? Perfusion. 2001;16:189–98. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Nielsen J. Heuristic evaluation. In: Nielsen J, Mack RL, eds. Usability Inspection Methods. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1994:25–61. [Google Scholar]
  14. Nielsen J, Molich R. Heuristic evaluation of user interfaces. Proceedings of the ACM CHI’90 Conference, Seattle, WA, April 1–5, 1990. [Google Scholar]
  15. Strauch B. Investigating Human Error: Incidents, Accidents, and Complex Systems, Burlington, VT: Ashgate Publishing; 2004. [Google Scholar]
  16. Wickens C, Hollands J. Attention in perception and display space. In: Wickens C, Hollands J, eds. Engineering Psychology and Human Performance. 3rd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 2000:97–100. [Google Scholar]
  17. CTSnet Cardiothoracic Surgery Safety Reporting System. Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Available with password at: http://ctsrs.ctsnet.org/sections/anecdotes/anecdotes.cfm. Accessed June 27, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  18. Edworthg J, Hellier E. Fewer but better auditory alarms will improve patient safety. Qual Saf Health Care. 2005;14:212–5. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Organizations National Patient Safety Goals, The Joint Commission. Oakbrook Terrace, IL, 2003. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.