EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 41 / No 3 (September 2009) J Extra Corpor Technol, 41 3 (2009) 166-171 References
Free Access
Issue
J Extra Corpor Technol
Volume 41, Number 3, September 2009
Page(s) 166 - 171
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/ject/200941166
Published online 15 September 2009
  1. Berryessa R, Wiencek R, Jacobson J, Hollingshed D, Farmer K, Cahill G. Vacuum-assisted venous return in pediatric cardiopulmonary bypass. Perfusion. 2000;15:63–7. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Darling E, Kaemmer C, Lawson S, et al. Experimental use of an ultra-low prime neonatal circuitry utilizing vacuum-assisted venous drainage. J Extra Corpor Technol. 1998;30:184–9. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Norman MJ, Sistino JJ, Acsell JR. The effectiveness of low-prime cardiopulmonary bypass circuits at removing gaseous emboli. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2004;36:336–42. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Wilcox TW, Mitchell SJ, Gorman DF. Venous air in the bypass circuit: A source of arterial line emboli exacerbated by vacuum-assisted drainage. Ann Thorac Surg. 1999;68:1285–9. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Jones TJ, Deal DD, Vernon JC, Blackburn N, Stump D. Does vacuum-assisted venous drainage increase gaseous microemboli during cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002;74:2132–7. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. LaPietra A, Grossi EA, Pua BB, et al. Assisted venous drainage presents the risk of undetected air microembolism. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2000;120:856–63. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Stock UA, Müller T, Bienek R, Hartrumpf M, Albes J. Deairing of the venous drainage in standard extracorporeal circulation results in a profound reduction of arterial micro bubbles. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006;54:39–41. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Rodriguez RA, Rubens F, Belway D, Nathan HJ. Residual air in the venous cannula increases cerebral embolization at the onset of cardiopulmonary bypass. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2006;29:175–80. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Dickinson TA, Riley JB, Crowley JC, Zabetakis PM. In vitro evaluation of the air separation ability of four cardiovascular manufacturer extracorporeal circuit designs. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2006;38:206–13. [Google Scholar]
  10. Beckley PD, Shinko PD, Sites JP. A comparison of gaseous emboli release in five membrane oxygenators. Perfusion. 1997;12:133–41. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. De Somer F, Dierickx P, Dujardin D, Verdonek P, Van Nooten G. Can an oxygenator design potentially contribute to air embolism in cardiopulmonary bypass? A novel method for the determination of neonatal membrane oxygenators. Perfusion. 1998;13:157–63. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. De Somer F. Impact of oxygenator characteristics on its capability to remove gaseous microemboli. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2007;39:271–3. [Google Scholar]
  13. Mitchell SJ, Wilcox T, Gorman DF. Bubble generation and venous air filtration by hard-shell venous reservoirs: A comparative study. Perfusion. 1997;12:325–33. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Taylor RL, Borger MA, Weisel RD, Fedorko L, Feindel CM. Cerebral emboli during cardiopulmonary bypass: Increased emboli during perfusionist interventions. Ann Thorac Surg. 1999;68:89–93. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Borger MA, Peniston CM, Weisel RD, Vasilious M, Green REA, Feindel CM. Neuropsychological impairment after coronary bypass surgery: Effect of gaseous microemboli during perfusionist interventions. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2001;121:743–9. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Ascione R, Ghosh A, Reeves BC, et al. Retinal and cerebral microembolization during coronary artery bypass surgery:A randomized, controlled trial. Circulation. 2005;112:3833–8. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Babikian VL, Wolf PA. Retinal and cerebral microembolism during on-pump and off-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Circulation. 2005;112:3816–7. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Lynch JE, Pouch A, Sanders R, Hinders M, Rudd K, Sevick J. Gaseous microemboli sizing in extracorporeal circuits using ultrasound back-scatter. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2007;33:1661–75. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Riley JB. Arterial line filters ranked for gaseous micro-emboli separation performance: An in vitro study. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2008;40:21–6. [Google Scholar]
  20. Whitaker DC, Green AJE, Stygall J, Harrison MJG, Newman SP. Evaluation of an alternative S100b assay for use in cardiac surgery: Relationship with microemboli and neuropsychological outcome. Perfusion. 2007;22:267–72. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Murphy GJ, Reeves BC, Rogers CA, Rizvi SIA, Culliford L, Angelini GD. Increase mortality, postoperative morbidity, and cost after red blood cell transfusion in patients having cardiac surgery. Circulation. 2007;116:2544–52. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.