Open Access
Issue
J Extra Corpor Technol
Volume 41, Number 4, December 2009
Page(s) 206 - 212
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/ject/200941206
Published online 15 July 2009
  1. Ninomiya S, Tokumine A, Yasuda T, Tomizawa Y. Development of an educational simulator system, ECCSIM-Lite, for the acquisition of basic perfusion techniques and evaluation. J Artif Organs. 2007;10:201–5. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Tokumine A, Ninomiya S, Anno M, et al. Educational simulator “ECCSIM-Lite” used at the JaSECT seminar with analysis of questionnaire survey results Jpn J of Extracorporeal Technology. 2008;35:343–7 (in Japanese). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Tokaji M, Ninomiya S, Tokumine A, Kurosaki T. Study of the hemodynamics parameter estimation procedure of the educational perfusion simulator based on basic patient conditions. Jpn J Extracorporeal Technology. 2009;36:24–7 (in Japanese). [Google Scholar]
  4. Ninomiya S, Tokumine A, Tokaji M, Kurosaki T. The extracorporeal circulation simulator System: ECCSIM and ECCSIM-Lite. CIRCULATION Up-to-Date. 2009;4:22–32 (in Japanese). [Google Scholar]
  5. Ferrari G, Kozarski M, De Lazzari C, et al. Modelling of cardiovascular system: Development of a hybrid (numerical-physical) model. Int J Artif Organs. 2003;26:1104–14. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Timms D, Hayne M, McNeil K, Galbraith A. A complete mock circulation loop for the evaluation of left, right, and biventricular assist devices. Artif Organs. 2005;29:564–72. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cevenini G, Barbini P, Cappello A, Avanzolini G. Three-element model for total systemic circulation: Emphasis on the accuracy of parameter estimates. J Biomed Eng. 1987;9:374–8. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Ferrari G, De Lazzari C, Mimmo R, Tosti G, Ambrosi D. A modular numerical model of the cardiovascular system for studying and training in the field of cardiovascular physiopathology. J Biomed Eng. 1992;14:91–107. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Cavalcanti S, Di Marco LY. Numerical simulation of the hemodynamic response to hemodialysis-induced hypovolemia. Artif Organs. 1999;23:1063–73. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Shoukas AA, Sagawa K. Total systemic vascular compliance measured as incremental volume-pressure ratio. Circ Res. 1971;28:277–89. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Martin L. All You Really Need to Know to Interpret Arterial Blood Gases 2/E. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Inc; 1999:42–7. [Google Scholar]
  12. Goodwin JA, van Meurs WL, Sa Couto CD, Beneken JE, Graves SA. A model for educational simulation of infant cardiovascular physiology. Anesth Analg. 2004;99:1655–64. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Botden SM, Buzink SN, Schijven MP, Jakimowicz JJ. Augmented versus virtual reality laparoscopic simulation: What is the difference? A comparison of the ProMIS augmented reality laparoscopic simulator versus LapSim virtual reality laparoscopic simulator. World J Surg. 2007;31:764–72. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Higton P. Safety lessons from aviation. Perfusion. 2005;20:191–3. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Cumin D, Merry AF. Simulators for use in anaesthesia. Anaesthesia. 2007;62:151–62. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Morris RW, Pybus DA. “Orpheus” cardiopulmonary bypass simulation system. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2007;39:228–33. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Turkmen A, Rosinski D, Noyes N. A simulator for perfusion training. Perfusion. 2007;22:397–400. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Bauernschmitt R, Naujokat E, Mehmanesh H, et al. Mathematical modelling of extracorporeal circulation: Simulation of different per-fusion regimens. Perfusion. 1999;14:321–30. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Tomizawa Y. Trouble simulation course for extracorporeal circulation: Experiences from wet lab. Jpn J Artif Organs. 2006;35:223–6. [Google Scholar]
  20. Seropian MA. General concepts in full scale simulation: Getting started. Anesth Analg. 2003;97:1695–705. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.