Open Access
Issue
J Extra Corpor Technol
Volume 42, Number 1, March 2010
Page(s) 61 - 70
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/ject/201042061
Published online 15 March 2010
  1. Rubsamen DS. Continuous blood gas monitoring during cardiopulmonary bypass—How soon will it be the standard of care? J Cardiothorac Anesth. 1990;4:1–4. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Mark JB, FitzGerald D, Fenton T, et al. Continuous arterial and venous blood gas monitoring during cardiopulmonary bypass. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1991;102:431–9. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Walton HG, Boucher D, Linne D. Clinical evaluation of the CDI-100 in-line hematocrit/saturation monitor. J Extra Corpor Technol. 1999;31:80–3. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Trowbridge CC, Vasquez M, Stammers AH, et al. The effects of continuous blood gas monitoring during cardiopulmonary bypass: A prospective, randomized study-part 2. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2000;32:129–37. [Google Scholar]
  5. Walton HG, Duvall TB, Van den Hout J, Boucher DM. Comparison of blood gas and electrolyte test results from the Gem-Stat and CDI-300 versus a conventional laboratory analyzer. J Extra Corpor Technol. 1993;25:53–7. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Fried DW, Leo JJ, Mattioni GJ, et al. CDI blood parameter monitoring system 500IIa new tool for the clinical perfusionist. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2000;32:25–30. [Google Scholar]
  7. Southworth R, Sutton R, Mize S, et al. Clinical evaluation of a new in-line continuous blood gas monitor. J Extra Corpor Technol. 1998;30:166–70. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Trowbridge CC, Vasquez M, Stammers AH, et al. The effects of continuous blood gas monitoring during cardiopulmonary bypass: A prospective, randomized study-part 1. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2000;32:120–8. [Google Scholar]
  9. Schreur A, Niles S, Ploessl J. Use of the CDI blood parameter monitoring system 500 for continuous blood gas measurement during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation simulation. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2005;37:377–80. [Google Scholar]
  10. Svenmarker S, Lindholm R, Häggmark S, Jansson E, Benze S. Clinical evaluation of the CDI System 400 blood gas monitor. Perfusion. 1994;9:71–6. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Nauwynck M, Driessen J, Mulier J. Comparison between CDI-100 continuous SO2, Hb and Hct monitoring, intermittent ABL-4 saturation and Hb monitoring, and lab Hb and Hct monitoring. Acta Anaesthesiol Belg. 1996;47:199–206. [Google Scholar]
  12. Yaskulka SM, Burnside J, Bennett D, Olshove V, Langwell J. Accuracy of in-line venous saturation and hematocrit monitors in pediatric perfusion. J Extra Corpor Technol. 1995;27:132–6. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Gøthgen IH, Siggard-Andersen O, Rasmussen JP, Wimberley PD, Fogh-Andersen N. Fiber-optic chemical sensors (Gas-Stat®) for blood gas monitoring during hypothermic extracorporeal circulation. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 1987;47(Suppl 188):27–9. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Pino JA, Basheim G, Kenny MA. In vitro assessment of a flow-through fluometric blood gas monitor. J Clin Monit. 1988;4:186–94. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Walton HG, Boucher DM, Marroquin R. Comparison of blood gas and electrolyte test results from the Gem-Premier and the ABL-70 versus a conventional laboratory analyzer. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2003;35:24–7. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Steinfelder-Visscher J, Weerwind PW, Teerenstra S, Brouwer MHJ. Reliability of point-of-care hematocrit, blood gas, electrolyte, lactate and glucose measurement during cardiopulmonary bypass. Perfusion. 2006;21:33–7. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Musat A, Ouardirhi Y, Marty JC, Benkhadran S, David M, Girard C. Significance of continuous blood gas monitoring in cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2004;21:980–1. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Ferries LH. Standards of care in perfusion: Should not continuous in-line blood gas monitoring be one? J Extra Corpor Technol. 1992;24:45–8. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Prichard JS, French JS, Alvar N. Clinical Evaluation of the ABL-77 for point-of-care analysis in the cardiovascular operating room. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2006;38:128–33. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Baraka A, Baroody M, Haroun S, et al. Continuous venous oximetry during cardiopulmonary bypass: Influence of temperature changes, perfusion flow, and hematocrit levels. J Cardiothorac Anesth. 1990;4:35–8. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Pappert D, Rossaint R, Lewandowski K, Kuhlen R, Gerlach H, Falke KJ. Preliminary evaluation of a new continuous intra-arterial blood gas monitoring device. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1995;39(Supplementum 107):67–70. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Larson CPJr, Vender J, Seiver A. Multisite evaluation of a continuous intraarterial blood gas monitoring system. Anesthesiology. 1994;81:543–52. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1:307–10. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.