EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 43 / No 1 (March 2011) J Extra Corpor Technol, 43 1 (2011) P23-P26 References
Free Access
Issue
J Extra Corpor Technol
Volume 43, Number 1, March 2011
Page(s) P23 - P26
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/ject/201143P23
Published online 15 March 2011
  1. Hill JD, O’Brien TG, Murray JJ, et al. Prolonged extracorporeal oxygenation for acute post-traumatic respiratory failure (shock-lung syndrome). Use of the Bramson membrane lung. N Engl J Med. 1972;286:629–34. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Peek GJ, Mugford M, Tiruvoipati R, et al. Efficacy and economic assessment of conventional ventilatory support versus extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for severe adult respiratory failure (CESAR): A multicentre randomized controlled trial. Lancet. 2009;374:1351–63. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Webb SA, Pettila V, Seppelt I, et al. Critical care services and 2009 H1N1 influenza in Australia and New Zealand. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:1925–34. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Sidebotham D, McGeorge A, McGuinness S, Edwards M, Willcox T, Beca J. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for treating severe cardiac and respiratory disease in adults: Part 1—overview of extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2009;23:886–92. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Sidebotham D, McGeorge A, McGuinness S, Edwards M, Willcox T, Beca J. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for treating severe cardiac and respiratory failure in adults: Part 2-technical considerations. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2010;24:164–72. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Zapol WM, Snider MT, Hill JD, et al. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in severe acute respiratory failure. A randomized prospective study. JAMA. 1979;242:2193–6. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Morris AH, Wallace CJ, Menlove RL, et al. Randomized clinical trial of pressure-controlled inverse ratio ventilation and extracorporeal CO2 removal for adult respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1994;149:295–305. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Girard TD, Bernard GR. Mechanical ventilation in ARDS: A state-of-the-art review. Chest. 2007;131:921–9. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Laffey JG, O’Croinin D, McLoughlin P, Kavanagh BP. Permissive hypercapnia–role in protective lung ventilatory strategies. Intensive Care Med. 2004;30:347–56. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Lewandowski K, Rossaint R, Pappert D, et al. High survival rate in 122 ARDS patients managed according to a clinical algorithm including extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Intensive Care Med. 1997;23:819–35. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Linden V, Palmer K, Reinhard J, et al. High survival in adult patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome treated by extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, minimal sedation, and pressure supported ventilation. Intensive Care Med. 2000;26:1630–7. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Mols G, Loop T, Geiger K, Farthmann E, Benzing A. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: A ten-year experience. Am J Surg. 2000;180:144–54. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Ullrich R, Lorber C, Roder G, et al. Controlled airway pressure therapy, nitric oxide inhalation, prone position, and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) as components of an integrated approach to ARDS. Anesthesiology. 1999;91:1577–86. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Murray JF, Matthay MA, Luce JM, Flick MR. An expanded definition of the adult respiratory distress syndrome. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1988;138:720–3. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Zwischenberger JB, Lynch JE. Will CESAR answer the adult ECMO debate? Lancet. 2009;374:1307–8. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Moran JL, Chalwin RP, Graham PL. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) reconsidered. Crit Care Resusc. 2010;12:131–5. [Google Scholar]
  17. Pellegrino VA, Davies AR. CESAR: Deliverance or just the beginning? Crit Care Resusc. 2010;12:75–7. [Google Scholar]
  18. Freemantle N, Calvert M. Composite and surrogate outcomes in randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 2007;334:756–7. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Peek GJ, Clemens F, Elbourne D, et al. CESAR: Conventional ventilatory support vs. extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for severe adult respiratory failure. BMC Health Serv Res. 2006;6:163. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. De Backer D, Biston P, Devriendt J, et al. Comparison of dopamine and norepinephrine in the treatment of shock. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:779–89. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Bellomo R, Cass A, Cole L, et al. Intensity of continuous renal-replacement therapy in critically ill patients. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:1627–38. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Finfer S, Chittock DR, Su SY, et al. Intensive versus conventional glucose control in critically ill patients. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:1283–97. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Finfer S, Bellomo R, Boyce N, French J, Myburgh J, Norton R. A comparison of albumin and saline for fluid resuscitation in the intensive care unit. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:2247–56. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Steinberg KP, Hudson LD, Goodman RB, et al. Efficacy and safety of corticosteroids for persistent acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2006;354:1671–84. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Moller JT, Johannessen NW, Espersen K, et al. Randomized evaluation of pulse oximetry in 20,802 patients: II. Perioperative events and postoperative complications. Anesthesiology. 1993;78:445–53. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Moller JT, Pedersen T, Rasmussen LS, et al. Randomized evaluation of pulse oximetry in 20,802 patients: I. Design, demography, pulse oximetry failure rate, and overall complication rate. Anesthesiology. 1993;78:436–44. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Davies A, Jones D, Bailey M, et al. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for 2009 influenza A(H1N1) acute respiratory distress Syndrome. JAMA. 2009;302:1888–95. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.