EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 43 / No 1 (March 2011) J Extra Corpor Technol, 43 1 (2011) P33-P38 References
Free Access
Issue
J Extra Corpor Technol
Volume 43, Number 1, March 2011
Page(s) P33 - P38
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/ject/201143P33
Published online 15 March 2011
  1. Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS, eds. To Err Is Human: Building a Safer Health System. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1999. [Google Scholar]
  2. Brennan TA, Leape LL, Laird NM, et al. Incidence of adverse events and negligence in hospitalized patients: Results of the Harvard Practice Study I. N Engl J Med. 1991;67:370–6. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Leape LL, Berwick DM. Five years after to err is human: What have we learned? JAMA. 2005;293:2384–90. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Altman DE, Clancy C, Blendon RJ. Improving patient safety-five years after the IOM report. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:2041–3. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Mills P, Neily J, Dunn E. Teamwork and communication in surgical teams: Implications for patient safety. J Am Coll Surg. 2008;206:107–12. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Mills PD, Weeks WB. Characteristics of successful quality improvement teams: Lessons from five collaborative projects in the VHA. Jt Comm J Qual Saf. 2004;30:152–62. [Google Scholar]
  7. Wiegmann D, Shappell SA. A Human Error Approach to Aviation Accident Analysis: The Human Factors Analysis and Classification System. Burlington, VT: Ashgate Publishing Company; 2003:1–165. [Google Scholar]
  8. Helmreich RL, Merritt AC, Wilhelm JA. The evolution of Crew Resource Management training in commercial aviation. Int J Aviat Psychol. 1999;9:19–32. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Barker JM, Clothier CC, Woody JR, McKinney EH, Brown JL. Crew resource management: A simulator study comparing fixed versus formed aircrews. Aviat Space Environ Med. 1996;67:3–7. [Google Scholar]
  10. Sherman H, Loeb J. Project to Develop the International Patient Safety Event Taxonomy: Updated Review of the Literature 2003–2005. The WHO: World Health Organization Alliance for Patient Safety. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2005. [Google Scholar]
  11. Merry AF. CT28 creating the “error environment”. Aust N Z J Surg. 2007; 77:A13. [Google Scholar]
  12. Carthey J, deLeval MR, Reason JT. The human factor in cardiac surgery: Errors near misses in a high technology medical domain. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001;72:300–5. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Pronovost PJ. We need leaders: The 48th annual Rovenstine lecture. Anesthesiology. 2010;112:779–85. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Wiegmann DA, ElBardissi AW, Dearani JA, Daly RC, Sundt TMIII. Disruptions in surgical flow and their relationship to errors; An explanatory investigation. Surgery. 2007;142:658–65. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Makary MA, Sexton JB, Freischlag JA, et al. Patient safety in surgery. Ann Surg. 2006;243:628–35. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Merry AF. Human factors and the cardiac surgical team: A role for simulation. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2007;39:264–6. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Pronovost PJ, Goeschel CA, Colantuoni E, et al. Sustaining reductions in catheter related bloodstream infections in Michigan intensive care units: observational study. BMJ. 2010;340:C309. [Google Scholar]
  18. Pronovost PJ, Combes J, Joshi M. An executive checklist. Hosp Health Netw. 2009;83:52. [Google Scholar]
  19. Martinez EA, Marsteller JA, Thompson DA, et al. The Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists’ FOCUS initiative: Locating errors through networked surveillance (LENS) project vision. Anesth Analg. 2010;110:307–11. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Spiess BD, Wahr JA, Nussmeier NA. Bring your life into FOCUS! Anesth Analg. 2010;110:283–7. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.