Free Access
Issue |
J Extra Corpor Technol
Volume 44, Number 3, September 2012
|
|
---|---|---|
Page(s) | 104 - 115 | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/ject/201244104 | |
Published online | 15 September 2012 |
- Ferraris VA, Brown JR, Despotis GJ, et al. 2011 update to the Society of Thoracic Surgeons and the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists blood conservation clinical practice guidelines. Ann Thorac Surg. 2011;91:944–982. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Johnson SH, Theurer PF, Bell GF, Maresca L, Leyden T, Prager RL. A statewide quality collaborative for process improvement: Internal mammary artery utilization. Ann Thorac Surg. 2010;90:1158–1164; discussion 1164. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Hannan EL, Kilburn HJr, O’Donnell JF, Lukacik G, Shields EP. Adult open heart surgery in New York State. An analysis of risk factors and hospital mortality rates. JAMA. 1990;264:2768–2774. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- O’Connor GT, Plume SK, Olmstead EM, et al. A regional prospective study of in-hospital mortality associated with coronary artery bypass grafting. The Northern New England Cardiovascular Disease Study Group. JAMA. 1991;266:803–809. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Peterson ED, DeLong ER, Jollis JG, Muhlbaier LH, Mark DB. The effects of New York’s bypass surgery provider profiling on access to care and patient outcomes in the elderly. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998;32:993–999. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- DioDato CP, Likosky DS, DeFoe GR, et al. Cardiopulmonary bypass recommendations in adults: The Northern New England experience. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2008;40:16–20. [Google Scholar]
- Surgenor SD, DeFoe GR, Fillinger MP, et al. Intraoperative red blood cell transfusion during coronary artery bypass graft surgery increases the risk of postoperative low-output heart failure. Circulation. 2006;114:I43–I48. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Groom RC, Rassias AJ, Cormack JE, et al. Highest core temperature during cardiopulmonary bypass and rate of mediastinitis. Perfusion. 2004;19:119–125. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- DeFoe GR, Krumholz CF, DioDato CP, et al. Lowest core body temperature and adverse outcomes associated with coronary artery bypass surgery. Perfusion. 2003;18:127–133. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- DeFoe GR, Ross CS, Olmstead EM, et al. Lowest hematocrit on bypass and adverse outcomes associated with coronary artery bypass grafting. Northern New England Cardiovascular Disease Study Group. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001;71:769–776. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Warren CS, DeFoe GR, Groom RC, et al. Variation in arterial inflow temperature: A regional quality improvement project. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2011;43:58–63. [Google Scholar]
- Tuble SC. Perfusion Downunder Collaboration Database—Data quality assurance: Towards a high quality clinical database. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2011;43:44–51. [Google Scholar]
- Newland R, Baker RA, Stanley R, Place K, Willcox TW. The Perfusion Downunder Collaborative Database Project. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2008;40:159–165. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Baker RA, Newland RF, Fenton C, McDonald M, Willcox TW, Merry AF. Developing a benchmarking process in perfusion: A report of the Perfusion Downunder Collaboration. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2012;44:26–33. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cohn LH. Fifty years of open-heart surgery. Circulation. 2003;107:2168–2170. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Likosky DS. Integrating evidence-based perfusion into practices: The International Consortium for Evidence-Based Perfusion. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2006;38:297–301. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Riley JB, Kavanaugh TA. Perfusion services national process improvement benchmarking. J Extra Corpor Technol. 1998;30:25–29. [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.