Open Access
Issue
J Extra Corpor Technol
Volume 45, Number 2, June 2013
Page(s) 139 - 142
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/ject/201345139
Published online 15 June 2013
  1. Chitwood WRJr, Rodriguez E. Minimally invasive and robotic mitral valve surgery. In: Cohn LH, ed. Cardiac Surgery in the Adult. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 2008:1079–1100. [Google Scholar]
  2. Andersen HR, Knudsen LL, Hasenkam JM. Transluminal implantation of artificial heart valves. Description of new expandable aortic valve and initial results with implantation by catheter technique in closed chest pigs. Eur Heart J. 1992;13:704–708. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Wong R, Lee A, Ng CS, et al. Mitral valve repair: Past, present, and future. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann. 2010;18:586–595. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Grossi ELA, Ribakove GH, Delaindes J, et al. Minimally invasive sternotomy approaches for mitral reconstruction: Comparison of intermediate term results. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2001;121:708. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Mihaljevic T, Jarrett CM, Gillinov AM, et al. Robotic repair of posterior mitral valve prolapsed versus conventional approaches: Potential realized. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011;141:72–80. e1-e4. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Suri RM, Burkhart HM, Daly RC, et al. Robotic mitral valve repair for all prolapsed subsets using techniques identical to open valvuloplasty: Establishing the benchmark against which percutaneous interventions should be judged. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011;142:970–979. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Suri RM, Antiel RM, Burkhart HM, et al. Quality of life after early mitral valve repair using conventional and robotic approaches. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012;93:761–769. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Custodiol® HTK Solution; The multi-organ solution: Preservation and protection in organ transplantation. Available at: www.custodiol.com/about-custodiol.php. Accessed June 20, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  9. Braathen B, Jeppsson A, Schersten H, et al. One single dose of histidine–tryptophan–ketoglutarate solution gives equally good myocardial protection in elective mitral valve surgery as repetitive cold blood cardioplegia: A prospective randomized study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011;141:995–1001. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Sakata J, Morishita K, Ito T, et al. Comparison of clinical outcome between histidine–tryptophan–ketoglutarate solution and cold blood cardioplegic solution in mitral valve replacement. J Card Surg. 1998;13:43–47. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Scrascia G, Guida P, Rotunno C, et al. Myocardial protection during aortic surgery: Comparison between Bretschneider-HTK and cold blood cardioplegia. Perfusion. 2011;26:427–433. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Plotkin IM, Collard CD, Sary FA, et al. Percutaneous coronary sinus cannulation guided by transesophageal echocardiography. Ann Thorac Surg. 1998;66:2085–2087. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. D’Alonzo RC, Evelio R, Ryan WR. Percutaneous coronary sinus catheter placement aided by 3-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography. J Anesth Analg. 2010;110:722–724. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.