Free Access
Editorial
Issue
J Extra Corpor Technol
Volume 46, Number 3, September 2014
Page(s) 192 - 196
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/ject/201446192
Published online 15 September 2014
  1. Dresser R, Frader J: Off label prescribing: A call for heightened professional and government oversight. J Law Med Ethic. 2009;37: 476–490. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Fact Sheet, The National Task Force on CME Provider/Industry Collaboration. On-label and off-label usage of prescription medicines and devices, and the relationship to CME. Available at: www.amaassn.org/resources/doc/cme/fact-sheet-4.pdf. Accessed April 2, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  3. Liu S, Newland RF, Tully PJ, et al. In vitro evaluation of gaseous microemboli handling of cardiopulmonary bypass circuits with and without integrated arterial line filters. J Extracorp Techn. 2011;43:107–114. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Dogal NM, Mathis RK, Lin J, et al. Evaluation of three hollow-fiber membrane oxygenators without integrated arterial filters for neonatal cardiopulmonary bypass. Perfusion. 2012;27:132–140. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Mathis RK, Lin J, Dogal NM, et al. Evaluation of four pediatric cardiopulmonary bypass circuits in terms of perfusion quality and capturing gaseous microemboli. Perfusion. 2012;27:470–479. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Melchior RW, Rosenthal T, Glatz AC. An in vitro comparison of the ability of three commonly used pediatric cardiopulmonary bypass circuits to filter gaseous microemboli. Perfusion. 2010;25:255–263. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Muth CM, Shank ES. Gas embolism. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:476–482. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Stump DA. Embolic factors associated with cardiac surgery. Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2005;9:151–152. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Eckmann DM, Armstead SC. Influence of endothelial glycocalyx degradation and surfactants on air embolism adhesion. Anaesthesiol 2006;1005:1220–1227. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kobayashi S, Crooks SD, Eckmann DM. In vitro surfactant mitigation of gas bubble contact induced endothelial cell death. Undersea Hyperb Med. 2011;38:27–39. [Google Scholar]
  11. Barak M, Nakhoul F, Katz Y. Pathophysiology and clinical implications of microbubbles during hemodialysis. Semin Dial. 2008;21:232–238. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Abu-Omar Y, Balacumaraswami S, Pigott DW, et al. Solid and gaseous cerebral microembolism during off pump, on pump and open cardiac surgery procedures. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2004;127:1759–1765. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Bronson SL, Riley JB, Blessing JP, et al. Prescriptive patient extracorporeal circuit and oxygenator sizing reduces hemodilution and allogeneic blood product transfusion during adult cardiac surgery. J Extra Corp Techn. 2013;45:167–172. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Cormack JE, Forest RJ, Groom RC, Morton J. Size makes a difference: use of a low prime cardiopulmonary bypass circuit and autologous priming in small adults. Perfusion. 2000;15:129–135. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. McCusker K, Vijay V, DeBois W, et al. MAST system: A new condensed cardiopulmonary bypass circuit for adult cardiac surgery. Perfusion. 200;16:447–452. [Google Scholar]
  16. Lahanas A, Argerakis PW, Johnson KA, et al. A retrospective comparison of blood transfusion requirements during cardiopulmonary bypass with two different small adult oxygenators. Perfusion. 2013;28:541–545. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Myers GJ. Predictive Hemodilution: The Principle and Practice of Hemodilution During Cardiac Surgery. Mirandola, Italy: Sorin Perfusion Books, Sorin Group; 2013. [Google Scholar]
  18. Shander A, Knight K, Thurer R, et al. Prevalence and outcomes of anemia in surgery: A systematic review of the literature. Am J Med. 2004;116Suppl 7A:58S–69S. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Chappell D, Jacob M, Hofmann-Kiefer K, et al. A rational approach to perioperative fluid management. Anaesthesiology 2008;109:723–740. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Rosengart T, DeBois W, O’Hara M, et al. Retrograde autologous priming for cardiopulmonary bypass: A safe and effective means of decreasing hemodilution and transfusion requirements. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1998;115:426–438. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Vincent JL, Baron JF, Reinhart K, et al. Anemia and blood transfusion in critically ill patients. JAMA. 2002;288:1499–1507. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Strunden MS, Heckel K, Goetz AE, Reuter DA. Perioperative fluid and volume management: Physiological basis, tools and strategies. Ann Intensive Care. 2011;1:1–8. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Shann KG, Likosky DS, Murkin JM, et al. An evidence-based review of the practice of cardiopulmonary bypass in adults: A focus on neurologic injury, glycemic control, hemodilution, and the inflammatory response. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006;132:283–290. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. ANSI/AAMI. ISO 7199: Cardiovascular Implants and Artificial Organs—Blood Gas Exchangers (Oxygenators). Arlington, VA: Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation; 2009 Available at: http://marketplace.aami.org/eseries/scriptcontent/docs/Preview%20Files/71990904_c1201_preview.pdf. Accessed April 2014. [Google Scholar]
  25. Bronson SL, Scott PD, Blessing JP, Riley JB Response to letter ‘Going beyond manufacturers’ limitations is not in the best interests of our patients’ by Gerard J. Myers. J Extra Corp Techn. 2014;46:103–104. [Google Scholar]
  26. Ranucci M, Romitti F, Isgrò G, et al. Oxygen delivery during cardiopulmonary bypass and acute renal failure after coronary operations. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005;80:2213–2220. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. de Somer F, Mulholland JW, Bryan MR, et al. O2 delivery and CO2 production during cardiopulmonary bypass as determinants of acute kidney injury: Time for a goal-directed perfusion management? Crit Care. 2011;15:R192. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.