Free Access
Issue
J Extra Corpor Technol
Volume 46, Number 4, December 2014
Page(s) 300 - 304
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/ject/201446300
Published online 15 December 2014
  1. Park CS Simulation and quality improvement in anesthesiology. Anesthesiol Clin. 2011;29:13–28. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Sistino JJ, Michaud NM, Sievert AN, Shackelford AG. Incorporating high fidelity simulation into perfusion education. Perfusion. 2011;26:390–394. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Stocker M, Burmester M, Allen M. Optimisation of simulation team training through the application of learning theories: A debate for conceptual framework. BMC Med Educ. 2014;14:1–9. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Merry AF, Weller J, Mitchell SJ. Teamwork, communication, formula-one racing and the outcomes of cardiac surgery. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2014;46:7–14. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Shear TD, Greenberg SB, Tokarczyk A. Does training with human patient simulation translate to improved patient safety and outcome? Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2013;26:159–163. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Rath TE, Holt DW. Vicarious audiovisual learning in perfusion education. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2010;42:305–312. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Burkhart HM, Riley JB, Hendrickson SE,et al. The successful application of simulation-based training in thoracic surgery residency. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010;139:707–713. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Ninomiya S, Tokaji M, Tokumine A, Kurosaki T. Virtual patient simulator for the perfusion resource management drill. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2009;41:206–212. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Chan R, Sun CT. Construction of the real patient simulator system. Perfusion. 2012;27:187–192. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Lansdowne W, Machin D, Grant DJ. Development of the Orpheus Perfusion Simulator for use in high-fidelity extracorporeal membrane oxygenation simulation. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2012;44:250–255. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Fernandez A. Simulation in perfusion: Where do we go from here? Perfusion. 2010;25:17–20. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. McFadyen AK, Maclaren WM, Webster VS. The Interdisciplinary Education Perception Scale (IEPS): An alternative remodeled sub-scale structure and its reliability. J Interprof Care. 2007;21:433–443. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. McFadyen AK, Webster VS, Maclaren WM, O’Neill MA. Interprofessional attitudes and perceptions: Results from a longitudinal controlled trial of pre-registration health and social care students in Scotland. J Interprof Care. 2010;24:549–564. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. PASW Statistics for Windows. Version 18.0. Chicago, IL: SPSS Inc.; 2009. [Google Scholar]
  15. Luparell S. Incivility in nursing: the connection between academia and clinical settings. Crit Care Nurse. 2011;31:92–95. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Dimarino TJ Eliminating lateral violence in the ambulatory setting: One center’s strategies. AORN J. 2011;93:583–588. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Hickson J. New nurses’ perceptions of hostility and job satisfaction. J Nurs Adm. 2013;43:293–301. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Dedy NJ, Bonrath EM, Zevin B, Grantcharov TP. Teaching nontechnical skills in surgical residency: A systematic review of current approaches and outcomes. Surgery. 2013;154:1000–1008. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.