EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 48 / No 3 (September 2016) J Extra Corpor Technol, 48 3 (2016) 99-104 References
Free Access
Review
Issue
J Extra Corpor Technol
Volume 48, Number 3, September 2016
Page(s) 99 - 104
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/ject/201648099
Published online 15 September 2016
  1. Speiss B. D. Transfusion and outcome in heart surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002;74:986–7. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Murphy G. J., Pike K., Rogers C. A., et al. Liberal or restrictive transfusion after cardiac surgery. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:997–1008. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Surgenor S. D., DeFoe G. R., Fillinger M. P., et al. Intraoperative red blood cell transfusion during coronary artery bypass graft surgery increases the risk of postoperative low-output heart failure. Circulation. 2006;114(Suppl):I43–8. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Surgenor S. D., Kramer R. S., Olmstead E. M., et al. The association of perioperative red blood cell transfusions and decreased long-term survival after cardiac surgery. Anesth Analg. 2009;108:1741–6. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Spiess B. D. Blood transfusion for cardiopulmonary bypass: The need to answer a basic question. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2002;16:535–8. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Society of Thoracic Surgeons Blood Conservation Guideline Task Force; Ferraris V. A., Brown J. R., et al. 2011 update to the Society of Thoracic Surgeons and the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists blood conservation clinical practice guidelines. Ann Thorac Surg. 2011;91:944–82. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. American Heart Association Methodologies and Policies from the ACC/AHA Task Force on Practice Guidelines. 2010 Available at: https://professional.heart.org/professional/GuidelinesStatements/PublicationDevelopment/UCM_320470_Methodologies-and-Policies-from-the-ACCAHA-Task-Force-on-Practice-Guidelines.jsp. Accessed June 7, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  8. PERForm Registry. Available at: http://www.performregistry.org. Accessed June 10, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  9. Paugh T. A., Dickinson T. A., Theurer P. F., et al. Validation of a perfusion registry: Methodological approach and initial findings. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2012;44:104–15. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Society of Thoracic Surgeons Blood Conservation Guideline Task; Ferraris V. A., Ferraris S. P., et al. Perioperative blood transfusion and blood conservation in cardiac surgery: The Society of Thoracic Surgeons and The Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists clinical practice guideline. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;83(Suppl):S27–86. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Segal J. B., Blasco-Colmenares E., Norris E. J., Guallar E. Preoperative acute normovolemic hemodilution: A meta-analysis. Transfusion. 2004;44:632–44. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Shander A., Rijhwani T. S. Acute normovolemic hemodilution. Transfusion. 2004;44(Suppl):26S–34S. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Bryson G. L., Laupacis A., Wells G. A. Does acute normovolemic hemodilution reduce perioperative allogeneic transfusion? A meta-analysis. The International Study of Perioperative Transfusion. Anesth Analg. 1998;86:9–15. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Curley G. F., Shehata N., Mazer C. D., Hare G. M., Friedrich J. O. Transfusion triggers for guiding RBC transfusion for cardiovascular surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care Med. 2014;42:2611–24. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Sun P., Ji B., Sun Y., et al. Effects of retrograde autologous priming on blood transfusion and clinical outcomes in adults: A meta-analysis. Perfusion. 2013;28:238–43. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Rosengart T. K., DeBois W., O'Hara M., et al. Retrograde autologous priming for cardiopulmonary bypass: A safe and effective means of decreasing hemodilution and transfusion requirements. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1998;115:426–38; . discussion 438–29. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Saczkowski R., Bernier P. L., Tchervenkov C. I., Arellano R. Retrograde autologous priming and allogeneic blood transfusions: A meta-analysis. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2009;8:373–6. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Rousou J. A., Engelman R. M., Flack J. E.3rd, Deaton D. W., Garb J. L., Owen S. G. The ‘primeless pump’: A novel technique for intraoperative blood conservation. Cardiovasc Surg. 1999;7:228–35. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Reges R. V., Vicente W. V., Rodrigues A. J., et al. Retrograde autologous priming in cardiopulmonary bypass in adult patients: Effects on blood transfusion and hemodilution. Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc. 2011;26:609–16. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Shapira O. M., Aldea G. S., Treanor P. R., et al. Reduction of allogeneic blood transfusions after open heart operations by lowering cardiopulmonary bypass prime volume. Ann Thorac Surg. 1998;65:724–30. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Balachandran S., Cross M. H., Karthikeyan S., Mulpur A., Hansbro S. D., Hobson P. Retrograde autologous priming of the cardiopulmonary bypass circuit reduces blood transfusion after coronary artery surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002;73:1912–8. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Hou X., Yang F., Liu R., et al. Retrograde autologous priming of the cardiopulmonary bypass circuit reduces blood transfusion in small adults: A prospective, randomized trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2009;26:1061–6. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Sobieski M. A.2nd, Slaughter M. S., Hart D. E., Pappas P. S., Tatooles A. J. Prospective study on cardiopulmonary bypass prime reduction and its effect on intraoperative blood product and hemoconcentrator use. Perfusion. 2005;20:31–7. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Eising G. P., Pfauder M., Niemeyer M., et al. Retrograde autologous priming: Is it useful in elective on-pump coronary artery bypass surgery? Ann Thorac Surg. 2003;75:23–7. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Trowbridge C., Stammers A., Klayman M., Brindisi N. Factors that influence the ability to perform autologous priming. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2008;40:43–51. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Likosky D. S., Paugh T. PERForm Spring Report 2016. Ann Arbor, MI: The Michigan Society of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeons Quality Collaborative; 2016. [Google Scholar]
  27. Wahr J. A., Prager R. L., Abernathy J. H.3rd, et al. Patient safety in the cardiac operating room: human factors and teamwork: A scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2013;128:1139–69. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Brandrud A. S., Schreiner A., Hjortdahl P., Helljesen G. S., Nyen B., Nelson E. C. Three success factors for continual improvement in healthcare: An analysis of the reports of improvement team members. BMJ Qual Saf. 2011;20:251–9. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Nelson E. C., Godfrey M. M., Batalden P. B., et al. Clinical microsystems, part 1. The building blocks of health systems. Jt Comm J Qual Saf. 2008;34:367–78. [Google Scholar]
  30. Baker R. A., Bronson S. L., Dickinson T. A., et al. Report from AmSECT's International Consortium for evidence-based perfusion: American Society of Extracorporeal Technology Standards and Guidelines for Perfusion Practice: 2013. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2013;45:156–66. [Google Scholar]
  31. Baker R. A., Newland R. F. Continous quality improvement of perfusion practice: The role of electronic data collection and statistical control charts. Perfusion. 2008;23:7–16. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Likosky D. S., Surgenor S. D., Dacey L. J., et al. Rationalising the treatment of anaemia in cardiac surgery: Short and mid-term results from a local quality improvement initiative. Qual Saf Health Care. 2010;19:392–8. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.