EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 49 / No 1 (March 2017) J Extra Corpor Technol, 49 1 (2017) 30-35 References
Free Access
Issue
J Extra Corpor Technol
Volume 49, Number 1, March 2017
Page(s) 30 - 35
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/ject/201749030
Published online 15 March 2017
  1. Ferraris V. A., Brown J. R., Despotis G. J., et al. 2011 update to the society of thoracic surgeons and the society of cardiovascular anesthesiologists blood conservation clinical practice guidelines. Ann Thorac Surg. 2011;91:944–82. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bronson S. L., Riley J. B., Blessing J. P., Ereth M. H., Dearani J. A. Prescriptive patient extracorporeal circuit and oxygenator sizing reduces hemodilution and allogeneic blood product transfusion during adult cardiac surgery. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2013;45:167–72. [Google Scholar]
  3. Gallagher M. J., Franklin B. A., Ehrman J. K., et al. Comparative impact of morbid obesity vs heart failure on cardiorespiratory fitness. Chest. 2005;127:2197–203. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Santambrogio L., Leva C., Musazzi G., et al. Determination of pump flow rate during cardiopulmonary bypass in obese patients avoiding hemodilution. J Card Surg. 2009;24:245–9. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Alston R. P., Anderson A., Sanger K. Is body surface area still the best way to determine pump flow rate during cardiopulmonary bypass? Perfusion. 2006;21:139–47. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cunningham J. J. Body composition as a determinant of energy expenditure: A synthetic review and a proposed general prediction equation. Am J Clin Nutr. 1991;54:963–9. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Ranucci M., Romitti F., Isgro G., et al. Oxygen delivery during cardiopulmonary bypass and acute renal failure after coronary operations. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005;80:2213–20. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Buchholz A. C., Rafii M., Pencharz P. B. Is resting metabolic rate different between men and women? Br J Nutr. 2001;86:641–6. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Van Pelt R. E., Dinneno F. A., Seals D. R., Jones P. P. Age-related decline in RMR in physically active men: Relation to exercise volume and energy intake. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2001;281:E633–9. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. de Somer F., Mulholland J. W., Bryan M. R., Aloisio T., Van Nooten G. J., Ranucci M. O2 delivery and CO2 production during cardiopulmonary bypass as determinants of acute kidney injury: Time for a goal-directed perfusion management? Crit Care. 2011;15:R192. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. De Somer F. End-organ protection in cardiac surgery. Minerva Anestesiol. 2013;79:285–93. [Google Scholar]
  12. Justison G. Cardiopulmonary Bypass in Patients with Large Body Mass Index Using Goal Directed Perfusion. Tampa, FL: AmSECT International Conference; 2015. [Google Scholar]
  13. Sgouralis I., Evans R. G., Gardiner B. S., Smith J. A., Fry B. C., Layton A. T. Renal hemodynamics, function, and oxygenation during cardiac surgery performed on cardiopulmonary bypass: A modeling study. Physiol Rep. 2015;3:e12260. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Coleman M. D., Shaefi S., Sladen R. N. Preventing acute kidney injury after cardiac surgery. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2011;24:70–6. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Mao H., Katz N., Ariyanon W., et al. Cardiac surgery-associated acute kidney injury. Cardiorenal Med. 2013;3:178–99. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kanji H. D., Schulze C. J., Hervas-Malo M., et al. Difference between pre-operative and cardiopulmonary bypass mean arterial pressure is independently associated with early cardiac surgery-associated acute kidney injury. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2010;5:71. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Kearsey C., Thekkudan J., Robbins S., Ng A., Lakshmanan S., Luckraz H. Assessing the effectiveness of retrograde autologous priming of the cardiopulmonary bypass machine in isolated coronary artery bypass grafts. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2013;95:207–10. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Teman N., Delavari N., Romano M., Prager R., Yang B., Haft J. Effects of autologous priming on blood conservation after cardiac surgery. Perfusion. 2014;29:333–9. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Sun P., Ji B., Sun Y., et al. Effects of retrograde autologous priming on blood transfusion and clinical outcomes in adults: A meta-analysis. Perfusion. 2013;28:238–43. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Nanjappa A., Gill J., Sadat U., Colah S., Abu-Omar Y., Nair S. The effect of retrograde autologous priming on intraoperative blood product transfusion in coronary artery bypass grafting. Perfusion. 2013;28:530–5. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Severdija E. E., Heijmans J. H., Theunissen M., Maessen J. G., Roekaerts P. H., Weerwind P. W. Retrograde autologous priming reduces transfusion requirements in coronary artery bypass surgery. Perfusion. 2011;26:315–21. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Abdel Aal M., ElNahal N., Bakir B. M., Fouda M. Mini-cardiopulmonary bypass impact on blood conservation strategy in coronary artery bypass grafting. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2011;12:600–4. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Rosengart T. K., DeBois W., O'Hara M., et al. Retrograde autologous priming for cardiopulmonary bypass: A safe and effective means of decreasing hemodilution and transfusion requirements. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1998;115:426–38; . discussion 38–9 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Cormack J. E., Forest R. J., Groom R. C., Morton J. Size makes a difference: Use of a low-prime cardiopulmonary bypass circuit and autologous priming in small adults. Perfusion. 2000;15:129–35. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Starck C. T., Bettex D., Felix C., et al. Initial results of an optimized perfusion system. Perfusion. 2013;28:292–7. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Mongero L. B., Tesdahl E. A., Stammers A. H., et al. BMI >35 does not protect patients undergoing cardiac bypass surgery from red blood cell transfusion. Perfusion. 2016 Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27422866. Accessed August 26, 2016 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.