EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 50 / No 1 (March 2018) J Extra Corpor Technol, 50 1 (2018) 58-60 References
Free Access
Issue
J Extra Corpor Technol
Volume 50, Number 1, March 2018
Page(s) 58 - 60
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/ject/201850058
Published online 15 March 2018
  1. Peek GJ, Mugford M, Tiruvoipati R, et al. Efficacy and economic assessment of conventional ventilatory support versus extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for severe adult respiratory failure (CESAR): A multicentre randomized controlled trial. Lancet. 2009;374:1351–63. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Tramm R, Ilic D, Davies AR, et al. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for critically ill adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;1:CD010381. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Makdisi G, Hashmi ZA, Wozniak TC, et al. Left ventricular thrombus associated with arteriovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. J Thorac Dis. 2015;7:E552–4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Weis F, Beiras-Fernandez A, Bruegger D Huge intracardiac thrombosis in a patient on veno- arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2009;8:247–9. [Google Scholar]
  5. Gaide-Chevronnay L, Durand M, Rossi-Blancher M, et al. Cardiac thrombosis in a patient during extracorporeal life support. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2012;26:664–5. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Lee S, Chaturvedi A Imaging adults on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Insights Imaging. 2014;5:731–42. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Combes A, Leprince P, Luyt CE, et al. Outcomes and long-term quality-of-life of patients supported by extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for refractory cardiogenic shock. Crit Care Med. 2008;36:1404–11. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Smedira NG, Blackstone EH Postcardiotomy mechanical support: Risk factors and outcomes. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001;71:S60–6; discussion S82–5. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Jaski BE, Ortiz B, Alla KR, et al. A 20-year experience with urgent percutaneous cardiopulmonary bypass for salvage of potential survivors of refractory cardiovascular collapse. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010;139:753–7.e1–2. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Stub D, Bernard S, Pellegrino V, et al. Refractory cardiac arrest treated with mechanical CPR, hypothermia, ECMO and early reperfusion (the CHEER trial). Resuscitation. 2015;86:88–94. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Coats J Manual of Pathology. 4th ed. London: Longmans; 1900:96–97. Available at: https://archive.org/stream/manualofpatholog00coatuoft#page/96/mode/2up. [Google Scholar]
  12. Budhram GR, Mader TJ, Lutfy L, et al. Left ventricular thrombus development during ventricular fibrillation and resolution during resuscitation in a swine model of sudden cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2014;85:689–93. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Waller BF, Rohr TM, McLaughlin T, et al. Intracardiac thrombi: Frequency, location, etiology, and complications: A morphologic review–Part V. Clin Cardiol. 1995;18:731–4. Available at: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/clc.4960181209/epdf. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Niemann M, Gaudron PD, Bijnens B, et al. Differentiation between fresh and old left ventricular thrombi by deformation imaging. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012;5:667–75. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Muehrcke DD, McCarthy PM, Stewart RW, et al. Complications of extracorporeal life support systems using hepain-bound surfaces: The risk of intracardiac clot formation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1995;110:843–51. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kim SH, Ryu JS, Kim TY, et al. Abrupt formation of intracardiac thrombus during cardiopulmonary bypass with full heparinization—A case report. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2012;62:175–8. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.