EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 50 / No 4 (December 2018) J Extra Corpor Technol, 50 4 (2018) 225-230 References
Free Access
Issue
J Extra Corpor Technol
Volume 50, Number 4, December 2018
Page(s) 225 - 230
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/ject/201850225
Published online 15 December 2018
  1. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database January 2017 ReportThe Society of Thoracic Surgeons. 2017. [Google Scholar]
  2. Ellis MC, Paugh TA, Dickinson TA, et al. Nadir hematocrit on bypass and rates of acute kidney injury: Does sex matter? Ann Thorac Surg. 2015;100:1549–54; discussion 1554–1545. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Paugh TA, Dickinson TA, Martin JR, et al. Impact of ultrafiltration on kidney injury after cardiac surgery: The Michigan experience. Ann Thorac Surg. 2015;100:1683–8. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Charlesworth DC, Likosky DS, Marrin CA, et al. Development and validation of a prediction model for strokes after coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg. 2003;76:436–43. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Likosky DS, Leavitt BJ, Marrin CA, et al. Intra- and postoperative predictors of stroke after coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg. 2003;76:428–34; discussion 435. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Shih T, Zhang M, Kommareddi M, et al. Center-level variation in infection rates after coronary artery bypass grafting. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2014;7:567–73. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Likosky DS, Baker RA Five-year outcomes after off-pump or on-pump coronary-artery bypass grafting. N Engl J Med. 2017;376:894. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bakaeen FG, Chu D, Kelly RF, et al. Performing coronary artery bypass grafting off-pump may compromise long-term survival in a veteran population. Ann Thorac Surg. 2013;95:1952–60. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Poullis M, Baker RA, Likosky DS, et al. Perfusion data in Scientific Journals: Perfusion standards of reporting trials. J ExtraCorp Tech. 2010;42:101–2. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Paugh TA, Dickinson TA, Theurer PF, et al. Validation of a perfusion registry: Methodological approach and initial findings. J ExtraCorp Tech. 2012;44:104–15. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Baker RA, Newland RF, Fenton C, et al. Developing a benchmarking process in perfusion: A report of the perfusion downunder collaboration. J ExtraCorp Tech Mar 2012;44:26–33. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Newland R, Baker RA, Stanley R, et al. The Perfusion Downunder collaborative database project. J ExtraCorp Tech. 2008;40:159–65. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. The Australian and New Zealand Society of Cardiac and Thoracic Surgeons Database. 2017 Available at: https://anzscts.org/database/. Accessed August 27, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  14. DioDato CP, Likosky DS, DeFoe GR, et al. Cardiopulmonary bypass recommendations in adults: The northern new England experience. J ExtraCorp Tech. 2008;40:16–20. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Warren CS, DeFoe GR, Groom RC, et al. Variation in arterial inflow temperature: A regional quality improvement project. J ExtraCorp Tech. 2011;43:58–63. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Warren OJ, Wallace S, de Wit KL, et al. Variations in the application of various perfusion technologies in Great Britain and Ireland–a national survey. Artif Organs. 2010;34:200–5. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Tuble SC, Willcox TW, Baker RA Australian and New Zealand perfusion survey: Management and procedure. J ExtraCorp Tech. 2009;41:64–72. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. The society of clinical perfusion scientists of Great Britain and Ireland and the college of clinical perfusion scientists of Great Britain and Ireland. Code of practice. Available at: http://www.scps.org.uk/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=34&Itemid=40. Accessed August 27, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  19. The Department of Health. A guide to good practice in clinical perfusion. 2009 Available at: https://www.scps.org.uk/pdfs/GuidetoGoodPractice.pdf. Accessed August 27, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  20. Society of Clinical Perfusion. Scientists of Great Britain & Ireland, and the Society for Cardiothoracic Surgery in Great Britain & Ireland. Recommendations for Standards of Monitoring and Safety during Cardiopulmonary Bypass. 2016 Available at: http://www.actacc.org/store/docs/news/RSM-and-Safety-during-CPB-Aug-2016-217413-19-09-2016.pdf. Accessed August 27, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  21. Australasian Board of Cardiovascular Perfusion. Regulations and guidelines for perfusionists. Available at: http://esvc000803.wic050u.server-web.com/Documents/ANZCP Regulations.pdf. Accessed April 19, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  22. Baker RA, Bronson SL, Dickinson TA, et al. Report from AmSECT's International Consortium for evidence-based perfusion: American Society of Extracorporeal Technology Standards and Guidelines for perfusion practice: 2013. J ExtraCorp Tech. 2013;45:156–66. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Song Y, Skinner J, Bynum J, et al. Regional variations in diagnostic practices. New Engl J Med. 2010;363:45–53. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Murphy GS, Hessel EA2nd, Groom RC Optimal perfusion during cardiopulmonary bypass: An evidence-based approach. Anesth Analg. 2009;108:1394–417. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Bartels C, Gerdes A, Babin-Ebell J, et al. Cardiopulmonary bypass: Evidence or experience based? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2002;124:20–7. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. The CONSORT Group. The CONsolidated Standards of Reporting Trials CONSORT Guideline. Available at: http://www.consort-statement.org/about-consort/the-consort-group. Accessed September 4, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  27. Likosky DS, Baker RA, Dickinson TA, et al. Report from AmSECT’s International Consortium for evidence-based perfusion consensus statement: Minimal criteria for reporting cardiopulmonary bypass-related contributions to red blood cell transfusions associated with adult cardiac surgery. J ExtraCorp Tech. 2015;47:83–9. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Merry AF An overview of quality and safety in health care. Canadian J Anaesthesia. 2013;60:101–4. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.