Open Access
Issue
J Extra Corpor Technol
Volume 52, Number 2, June 2020
Page(s) 90 - 95
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/ject/202052090
Published online 15 June 2020
  1. Cosgrove DM, Sabik JF Minimally invasive approach for aortic valve operations. Ann Thorac Surg. 1996;62:596–7. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Baumbach H, Rustenbach CJ, Ahad S, et al. Minimally invasive extracorporeal bypass in minimally invasive heart valve operations: A prospective randomized trial. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016;102:93–100. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Anastasiadis K, Murkin J, Antonitsis P, et al. Use of minimally invasive extracorporeal circulation in cardiac surgery: Principles, definitions, and potential benefits. A position paper for the MiECTIS. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2016;22:647–62. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Berretta P, Cefarelli M, Vessella W, et al. Ultra fast track surgery: A rapid deployment aortic valve replacement through a J-mini-sternotomy. J Vis Surg. 2018;4:90–5. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Anastasiadis Y, Antonitsis P MICS – MiECC: Can’t have one without the other. Perfusion. 2016;31:438–9. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Gunaydin S, McCusker K, Vijay V Clinical and biomaterial evaluation of a new condensed dual-function extracorporeal circuit in reoperation for coronary artery bypass surgery. Int J Artif Organs. 2009;32:802–10. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Iribarne A, Easterwood R, Chan EYH, et al. The golden age of minimally invasive cardiothoracic surgery: Current and future perspectives. Future Cardiol. 2011;7:333–46. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Chang C, Raza S, Altarabsheh SE, et al. Minimally invasive approaches to surgical aortic valve replacement: A meta-analysis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2018;106:1881–9. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Glauber M, Di Bacco LCuenca J, et al. Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement with sutureless valves: Results from an international prospective registry. Innovations. 2020;15:120–30. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Santarpino G, Berretta P, Kappert U, et al. Minimally invasive redo aortic valve replacement: Results from a multicentric registry. Ann Thorac Surg. 2020;S0003–4975:30015–1. [Google Scholar]
  11. Halfwerk FR, Knol K, Mariani S, et al. Randomized trial of miniaturized versus standard extracorporeal circulation in aortic valve surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2019;108:37–44. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Berretta P, Cefarelli M, Montecchiani L, et al. Minimally invasive versus standard extracorporeal circulation system in minimally invasive aortic valve surgery: A propensity score-matched study. Eur J Cardio Thorac Surg. 2020;57:717–23. [Google Scholar]
  13. Doenst T, Lamelas J Do we have enough evidence for minimally-invasive cardiac surgery? A critical review of scientific and non-scientific information. J Cardiovasc Surg. 2017;58:613–23. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Gunaydin S, Sari T, McCusker K, et al. Clinical evaluation of minimized extracorporeal circulation in high-risk coronary revascularization: Impact on air handling, inflammation, hemodilution and myocardial function. Perfusion. 2009;24:153–62. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Di Eusanioa M, Vessella W, Carozzac R, et al. Ultrafast-track minimally invasive aortic valve replacement: Going beyond reduced incisions. Eur J Cardio Thorac Surg. 2018;1(Suppl 2):S14–8. [Google Scholar]
  16. Berretta P, Andreas M, Carrel TP, et al. Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement with sutureless and rapid deployment valves: A report from an international registry. Eur J Cardio Thorac Surg. 2019;56:793–9. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. D’Onofrio A, Salizzoni S, Rubino AS, et al. The rise of new technologies for aortic valve stenosis: A comparison of sutureless and transcatheter aortic valve implantation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016;152:99–109. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Hirji SA, Funamoto M, Lee J, et al. Minimally invasive versus full sternotomy aortic valve replacement in low-risk patients: Which will stand against transcatheter aortic valve replacement? Surgery. 2018;164:282–7. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.