EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 52 / No 4 (December 2020) J Extra Corpor Technol, 52 4 (2020) 319-326 References
Free Access
Issue
J Extra Corpor Technol
Volume 52, Number 4, December 2020
Page(s) 319 - 326
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/ject/202052319
Published online 15 December 2020
  1. American Society of Extracorporeal Technology Standards and Guidelines for Perfusion Practice (5/23/2017). Available at: https://www.amsect.org/p/cm/d/fid=1617. Accessed September 12, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  2. American Society of Extracorporeal Technology Standards and Guidelines for Mechanical Circulatory Support (9/8/2017). Available at: https://www.amsect.org/d/do/1278. Accessed September 12, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  3. Shore-Lesserson L, Baker RA, Ferraris V, et al. STS/SCA/AmSECT clinical practice guidelines: Anticoagulation during cardiopulmonary bypass. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2018;50:5–18. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Engelman R, Baker RA, Likosky DS, et al. The society of thoracic surgeons, the society of cardiovascular anesthesiologists, and the American society of ExtraCorporeal Technology: Clinical practice guidelines for cardiopulmonary bypass–temperature management during cardiopulmonary bypass. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2015;47:145–54. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Landis RC, Brown JR, Fitzgerald D, et al. Attenuating the systemic inflammatory response to adult cardiopulmonary bypass: A critical review of the evidence base. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2014;46:197–211. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Society of Thoracic Surgeons Blood Conservation Guideline Task Force, Ferraris VA, Brown JR, Despotis GJ, et al. 2011 update to the Society of Thoracic Surgeons and the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists blood conservation clinical practice guidelines. Ann Thorac Surg. 2011;91:944–82. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. AmSECT. 2018 Standards and Clinical Practice Guidelines. Available at: http://www.amsect.org/page/standards-and-guielines-1117. Accessed April 17, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  8. Baker RA, Bronson SL, Dickinson TA, et al. Report from AmSECT’s international consortium for evidence-based perfusion: American society of extra-corporeal technology standards and guidelines for perfusion practice. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2013;45:156–66. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kunst G, Milojevic M, Boer C, et al. 2019 EACTS/EACTA/EBCP guidelines on cardiopulmonary bypass in adult cardiac surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2019;123:713–57. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Caneo LF, Matte GS, Atik FA, et al. The Brazilian society for cardiovascular surgery (SBCCV) and Brazilian society for extracorporeal circulation (SBCEC) standards and guidelines for perfusion practice. Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2019;34: 239–360. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Lawson DS, Darling EM, Collins K, et al. Staffing issues at open-heart centers offering both pediatric and adult perfusion service: 1998 survey results. J Extra Corpor Technol. 1999;31:91–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. American Society of Extracorporeal Technology Standards and Guidelines for Pediatric and Congenital Perfusion Practice (5/31/2019). Available at: https://www.amsect.org/p/cm/ld/fid=1697. Accessed September 12, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  13. Swanson VC, Shangraw RE Splanchnic visceral, metabolic and glucoregulatory effects of CPB. In: Gravlee G, Davis R, Stammers A, et al. , eds. Cardiopulmonary Bypass: Principles and Practice. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins; 2008:352–75. [Google Scholar]
  14. Lee-Sensiba K, Azzaretto N, Carolina C, et al. Errors in flow and pressure related to the arterial filter purge line. J Extra Corpor Technol. 1998;30:77–82. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Wang S, Miller A, Myers J, et al. “Stolen” blood flow: Effect of an open arterial filter purge line in a simulated neonatal CPB model. ASAIO J. 2008;54:432–5. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Carvalho Filho EB, Marson FA, Costa LN, et al. Vacuum-assisted drainage in cardiopulmonary bypass: Advantages and disadvantages. Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc. 2014;29:266–71. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Durandy Y Vacuum-assisted venous drainage, angel or demon: PRO? J Extra Corpor Technol. 2013;45:122–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Willcox TW Vacuum assist: Angel or demon CON. J Extra Corpor Technol 2013;45:128–32. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Durandy Y The impact of vacuum-assisted venous drainage and miniaturized bypass circuits on blood transfusion in pediatric cardiac surgery. ASAIO J 2009;55:117–20. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Nakanishi K, Shichijo T, Shinkawa Y, et al. Usefulness of vacuum-assisted cardiopulmonary bypass circuit for pediatric open-heart surgery in reducing homologous blood transfusion. Eur J Cardio Thorac Surg. 2001;20:233–8. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Malmqvist G, Lingehall HC, Appelblad M, et al. Cardiopulmonary bypass prime composition: Beyond crystalloids versus colloids. Perfusion. 2019;34:130–5. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Liskaser FJ, Bellomo R, Hayhoe M, et al. Role of pump prime in the etiology and pathogenesis of cardiopulmonary bypass-associated acidosis. Anesthesiology. 2000;93:1170–3. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Boks RH, Golab HD, Takkenberg JJ, et al. Washing of irradiated red blood cells in paediatric cardiopulmonary bypass: Is it clinically useful? A retrospective audit. Eur J Cardio Thorac Surg. 2012;41:283–6. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Cholette JM, Henrichs KF, Alfieris GM, et al. Washing red blood cells and platelets transfused in cardiac surgery reduces postoperative inflammation and number of transfusions: Results of a prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2012;13:290–9. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. O’Leary MF, Szklarski P, Klein TM, et al. Hemolysis of red blood cells after cell washing with different automated technologies: Clinical implications in a neonatal cardiac surgery population. Transfusion. 2011;51:955–60. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Sasaki J, Tirotta C, Lim H, et al. Comparison of stored red blood cell washing techniques for priming extracorporeal circuits. Perfusion. 2018;33:130–5. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Shimpo H, Shimamoto A, Miyake Y, et al. Effect of ultrafiltration on priming solution with preserved blood for extracorporeal circulation in infants. ASAIO J. 1996;42:M792–4. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Swindell CG, Barker TA, McGuirk SP, et al. Washing of irradiated red blood cells prevents hyperkalemia during cardiopulmonary bypass in neonates and infants undergoing surgery for complex congenital heart disease. Eur J Cardio Thorac Surg. 2007;31:659–64. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. Grist G, Whittaker C, Merrigan K, et al. The correlation of fluid balance changes during cardiopulmonary bypass to mortality in pediatric and congenital heart surgery patients. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2011;43:215–26. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Toraman F, Evrenkaya S, Yuce M, et al. Highly positive intraoperative fluid balance during cardiac surgery is associated with adverse outcome. Perfusion. 2004;19:85–91. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Lex DJ, Tóth R, Czobor NR, et al. Fluid overload is associated with higher mortality and morbidity in pediatric patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2016;17:307–14. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Castaneda AR, Mayer JE, Jonas RA Cardiopulmonary bypass, Hypothermia, and circulatory arrest. In: Castaneda AR, Jonas RA, Mayer JE, eds. Cardiac Surgery of the Neonate and Infant, 1st ed Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders Company; 1994;25:23–39. [Google Scholar]
  33. Ricci Z, Polito A, Netto R, et al. Assessment of modified ultrafiltration hemodynamic impact by pressure recording analytical method during pediatric cardiac surgery. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2013;14:390–5. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Türköz A, Tunçay E, Balci ŞT, et al. The effect of modified ultrafiltration duration on pulmonary functions and hemodynamics in newborns and infants following arterial switch operation. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2014;15:600–7. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  35. Ziyaeifard M, Alizadehasl A, Aghdaii N, et al. The effect of combined conventional and modified ultrafiltration on mechanical ventilation and hemodynamic changes in congenital heart surgery. J Res Med Sci 2016;21:113. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Ziyaeifard M, Alizadehasl A, Massiumi G Modified ultrafiltration during cardiopulmonary bypass and postoperative course of pediatric cardiac surgery. Red Cardiovasc Med 2014;3:e17830. [Google Scholar]
  37. Heath M, Raghunathan K, Welsby I, et al. Using zero balance ultrafiltration with dialysate as a replacement fluid for hyperkalemia during cardiopulmonary bypass. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2014;46:262–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Hein OV, Von Heymann C, Morgera S, et al. Thoughts and progress. Artif Organs. 2005;29:507–10. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Huang H, Yao T, Wang W, et al. Continuous ultrafiltration attenuates the pulmonary injury that follows open heart surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg. 2003;76:136–40. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Journois D, Isreael-Beit D, Pourard P, et al. High volume, zero-balanced hemofiltration to reduce delayed inflammatory response to cardiopulmonary bypass in children. Anesthesiology. 1996;85:965–76. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Song L, Yinglong L, Jinping L Effects of zero-balanced ultrafiltration on procalcitonin and respiratory function after cardiopulmonary bypass. Perfusion. 2007;22:339–43. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Tallman RD, Dumond M, Brown D Inflammatory mediator removal by zero-balance ultrafiltration during cardiopulmonary bypass. Perfusion. 2002;17:111–5. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Zhu X, Ji B, Wang G, et al. The effects of zero-balance ultrafiltration on postoperative recovery after cardiopulmonary bypass: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Perfusion. 2012;27:386–92. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. McRobb CM, Ing RJ, Lawson DS, et al. Retrospective analysis of eliminating modified ultrafiltration after pediatric cardiopulmonary bypass. Perfusion. 2016;32:97–109. [Google Scholar]
  45. Harvey B, Shann KG, Fitzgerald D, et al. International pediatric perfusion practice: 2011 survey results. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2012;44:186–93. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Pappas A, Shankaran S, Laptook AR, et al. Hypocarbia and adverse outcome in neonatal hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy. J Pediatr. 2011;158:752–8. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Quarti A, Nardone S, Manfrini F, et al. Effect of the adjunct of carbon dioxide during cardiopulmonary bypass on cerebral oxygenation. Perfusion. 2013;28:152–5. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Ottens J, Tuble SC, Sanderson AJ, et al. Improving cardiopulmonary bypass: Does continuous blood gas monitoring have a role to play? J Extra Corpor Technol. 2010;42:191–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Trowbridge CC, Vasquez M, Stammers AH, et al. The effects of continuous blood gas monitoring during cardiopulmonary bypass: A prospective, randomized study–part II. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2000;32:129–37. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Hoffman GM, Ghanayem NS, Scott JP, et al. Postoperative cerebral and somatic near-infrared spectroscopy saturations and outcome in hypoplastic left heart syndrome. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016;103:1527–35. [Google Scholar]
  51. Redlin M, Koster A, Huebler M, et al. Regional differences in tissue oxygenation during cardiopulmonary bypass for correction of congenital heart disease in neonates and small infants: Relevance of near-infrared spectroscopy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008;136:962–7. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Redlin M, Boettcher W, Huebler M, et al. Detection of lower torso ischemia by NIRS during CPB in a 6.8-kg infant with complex aortic anatomy. Ann Thorac Surg. 2006;82:323–5. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Fenton KN, Freeman K, Glogowski K, et al. The significance of baseline cerebral oxygen saturation in children undergoing congenital heart surgery. Am J Surg. 2005;190:260–3. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Conliffe JA, Riley JB, Clutter J, et al. A report of perfusion staffing survey: Decision factors that influence staffing of perfusion teams. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2007;39:249–53. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Stammers AH, Mejak BL An update on perfusion safety: Does the type of perfusion practice affect the rate of incidents related to cardiopulmonary bypass? Perfusion. 2001;16:189–98. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Wahr JA, Prager RL, Abernathy JHIII, et al. Patient safety in the cardiac operating room: Human factors and teamwork. Circulation. 2013;128:1139–69. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Hickey E, Pham-Hung E, Nosikova Y, et al. NASA model of “threat and error” in pediatric cardiac surgery: Patterns of error chains. Ann Thorac Surg. 2017;103:1300–7. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Jacobs JP, He X, Mayer JEJr, et al. Mortality trends in pediatric and congenital heart surgery: An analysis of the society of thoracic surgeons congenital heart surgery database. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016;102:1345–2. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Jeffries HE, Soto-Campos G, Katch A, et al. Pediatric index of cardiac surgical intensive care mortality risk score for pediatric cardiac critical care. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2015;16:846–52. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Shann KG, Giacomuzzi CR, Harness L, et al. Complications relating to perfusion and extracorporeal circulation associated with the treatment of patients with congenital cardiac disease: Consensus definitions from the multi-societal database committee for pediatric and congenital heart disease. Cardiol Young. 2008;18(Suppl 2):206–14. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Shann KG, Giacomuzzi CR, Jacobs JP, et al. Rationale and use of perfusion variables in the 2010 update of the society of thoracic surgeons congenital heart surgery database. World J Pediatr Congenit Heart Surg. 2010;1:34–43. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.