Free Access
J Extra Corpor Technol
Volume 53, Number 4, December 2021
Page(s) 251 - 262
Published online 15 December 2021
  1. Kotsis SV, Chung KC. Application of the “see one, do one, teach one” concept in surgical training. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;131:1194–201. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Sahu PK, Chattu VK, Rewatkar A, et al. Best practices to impart clinical skills during preclinical years of medical curriculum. J Educ Health Promot. 2019;8:57. [Google Scholar]
  3. Rodriguez-Paz JM, Kennedy M, Salas E, et al. Beyond “see one, do one, teach one”: Toward a different training paradigm. Qual Saf Health Care. 2009;18:63–8. [Google Scholar]
  4. Ziv A, Wolpe PR, Small SD, et al. Simulation-based medical education: An ethical imperative. Acad Med. 2003;78:783–8. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Digital Repository SUNY. The role of simulation in perfusion: A 2010 survey of the perfusion community. Available at: [Google Scholar]
  6. Fernandez A. Simulation in perfusion: Where do we go from here? Perfusion. 2010;25:17–20. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Corsino A, Yurek A. Immersive high-fidelity simulation as a teaching method in perfusion Education: Students perspective on pre-clinical skill development. The Academy Newsletter, Summer 2016. [Google Scholar]
  8. Sistino JJ, Michaud NM, Sievert AN, et al. Incorporating high fidelity simulation into perfusion education. Perfusion. 2011;26:390–4. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Razavi SM, Karbakhsh M, Panah Khahi M, et al. Station-based deconstructed training model for teaching procedural skills to medical students: A quasi-experimental study. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2010;1:17–23. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Giacomino K, Caliesch R, Sattelmayer KM. The effectiveness of the Peyton’s 4-step teaching approach on skill acquisition of procedures in health professions education: A systematic review and meta-analysis with integrated meta-regression. Peer J. 2020;8:e10129. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Michels MEJ, Evans DE, Blok GA. What is a clinical skill? Searching for order in chaos through a modified Delphi process. Med Teach. 2012;34:e573–81. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Searles B, Darling E, Riley J, et al. Fundamental clinical skills of adult cardiopulmonary bypass: Results of the 2017 national survey. Perfusion. 2019;34:290–6. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Accreditation Committee—Perfusion Education. Approved Cardiovascular Perfusion Curriculum. Revised 2010. Available at: pp. 1–102. [Google Scholar]
  14. Walczak A, Klein T, Voss J, et al. International perfusion practice: 2016 survey results. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2021;53:7–26. [Google Scholar]
  15. American Society of ExtraCorporeal Technology Standards and Guidelines for Pediatric and Congenital Perfusion Practice. May 2019. pp. 1–50. Available at: [Google Scholar]
  16. Matte GS. Perfusion for Congenital Heart Surgery: Notes on Cardiopulmonary Bypass in a Complex Patient Population. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2015. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, et al. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)–a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009;42:377–81. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Artino AR, La Rochelle JS, Dezee KJ, et al. Developing questionnaires for educational research: AMEE Guide No. 87. Med Teach. 2014;36:463–74. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Tsang S, Royse CF, Terkawi AS. Guidelines for developing, translating, and validating a questionnaire in perioperative and pain medicine. Saudi J Anaesth. 2017;11:S80–9. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Graesser AC, Wiemer-Hastings K, Kreuz R, et al. QUAID: A questionnaire evaluation aid for survey methodologists. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 2000;32:254–62. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Griswold S, Ponnuru S, Nishisaki A, et al. The emerging role of simulation education to achieve patient safety: Translating deliberate practice and debriefing to save lives. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2012;59:1329–40. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Agha RA, Fowler AJ. The role and validity of surgical simulation. Int Surg. 2015;100:350–7. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Wearne S. Teaching procedural skills in general practice. Aust Fam Physician. 2011;40:63–7. [Google Scholar]
  24. Austin JW, Riley JB. Principles of simulation applied to perfusion technology: 2005 update. J ECT. 2005;37:118. [Google Scholar]
  25. Melchior RW, Rosenthal T, Schiavo K, et al. A systematic evaluation of the core communication skills expected of a perfusionist. Perfusion. 2012;27:43–8. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Groom RC, Froebe S, Martin J, et al. Update on pediatric perfusion practice in North America: 2005 survey. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2005;37:343–50. [Google Scholar]
  27. Standards and Guidelines for the Accreditation of Educational Programs in Perfusion. 2018;1–13. [Google Scholar]
  28. Strum LP, Windsor JA, Cosman PH, et al. A systematic review of skills transfer after surgical simulation training. Ann Surg. 2008;248:166–79. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Searles B, Darling EM, Riley JB, et al. Survey of the routine practice limits for physiologic and technical parameters managed by clinical perfusionists during adult cardiopulmonary bypass. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2020;52:165–72. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.