EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 54 / No 3 (September 2022) J Extra Corpor Technol, 54 3 (2022) 250-254 References
Free Access
Issue
J Extra Corpor Technol
Volume 54, Number 3, September 2022
Page(s) 250 - 254
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/ject/202254250
Published online 15 September 2022
  1. Krage R, Erwteman M. State-of-the-art usage of simulation in anesthesia: Skills and teamwork. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2015;28:727–34. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Nakarada-Kordic I, Weller JM, Webster CS, et al. Assessing the similarity of mental models of operating room team members and implications for patient safety: A prospective, replicated study. BMC Med Educ. 2016;16:229. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Stewart-Parker E, Galloway R, Vig S. S-TEAMS: A truly multiprofessional course focusing on nontechnical skill to improve patient safety in the operating theater. J Surg Educ. 2017;74:137–44. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hamstra SJ, Brydges R, Hatala R, et al. Reconsidering fidelity in simulation-based training. Acad Med. 2014;89:387–92. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Davis WA, Jones S, Crowell-Kuhnberg AM, et al. Operative team communication during simulated emergencies: Too busy to respond? Surgery. 2017;161:1348–56. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Martinez Acero N, Motuk G, Luba J, et al. Managing a surgical exsanguination emergency in the operating room through simulation: An interdisciplinary approach. J Surg Educ. 2012;69:759–65. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Price JW, Price JR, Pratt DD, et al. High-fidelity simulation in anesthesiology training: A survey of Canadian anesthesiology residents’ simulator experience. Can J Anaesth. 2010;57:134–42. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Mokadam NA, Fann JI, Hicks GL, et al. Experience with the cardiac surgery simulation curriculum: Results of the resident and faculty survey. Ann Thorac Surg. 2017;103:322–8. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Ribeiro IB, Ngu JMC, Lam BK, Edwards RA. Simulation-based skill training for trainees in cardiac surgery: A systematic review. Ann Thorac Surg. 2018;105:972–82. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2017.11.036. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Zachary BM, Kam LM, Kaufman BS, Ferner KJ. The utility of high-fidelity simulation for training critical care fellow in the management of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation emergencies: A randomized controlled trial. Crit Care Med. 2017;45:1367–73. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Merkle F, Kurtovic D, Matschke A, et al. Simulation-based training of critical events during cardiopulmonary bypass: Importance of a critical events checklist. Perfusion. 2021;36:239–47. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. The American Board of Thoracic Surgery. Operative requirements tracking form. Available at: https://www.abts.org/ABTS/CertificationWebPages/Operative_Requirements_Home_Page.aspx. Accessed August 7, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  13. The American Board of Surgery. General surgery training requirements. Available at: https://www.absurgery.org/default.jsp?certgsqe_training. Accessed on August 7, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  14. Westerdahl DE. The necessity of high-fidelity simulation in cardiology training programs. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;67:1375–8. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Herrmann G, Woermann U, Schlegel C. Interprofessional education in anatomy: Learning together in medical and nursing training. Anat Sci Educ. 2015;8:324–30. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Qiao J, Xu J, Li L, Ouyang YQ. The integration of immersive virtual reality simulation in interprofessional education: A scoping review. Nurse Educ Today. 2021;98:104773. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Paige JT, Garbee DD, Brown KM, et al. Using simulation in interprofessional education. Surg Clin North Am. 2015;95:751–66. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Ram H, Dwarakanath S, Green AE, et al. Iatrogenic aortic dissection associated with cardiac surgery: A narrative review. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2021;35:3050–66. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.