Open Access
Issue
J Extra Corpor Technol
Volume 56, Number 2, June 2024
Page(s) 71 - 76
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/ject/2024001
Published online 18 June 2024
  1. Williams MK. John Dewey in the 21st century. J Inq Action Educ 2017;9(1):91–102. [Google Scholar]
  2. Toomasian JM, Searles B, Kurusz M. The evolution of perfusion education in America. Perfusion 2003;18:257–265. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Johns C. Becoming a reflective practitioner. Oxford: Blackwell Science; 2000. [Google Scholar]
  4. Rolfe G, Freshwater D, Jasper M. Critical reflection for nursing and the helping professions: a user’s guide. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  5. Gibbs G. Learning by doing: a guide to teaching and learning methods, geography discipline network. UK: Further Education Unit at Oxford Polytechnic, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  6. Hildebrand C, Trowbridge E, Roach MA, et al. Resident self-assessment and self-reflection: University of Wisconsin-Madison’s five-year study. J Gen Intern Med 2008;24(3):361–365. [Google Scholar]
  7. Khan KS, Coomarasamy A. A hierarchy of effective teaching and learning to acquire competence in evidenced-based medicine. BMC Med Educ 2006;6:59. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Siles-Gonzalea J, Solano-Ruiz C. Self-assessment, reflection on practice and critical thinking in nursing students. Nurse Educ Today 2016;45:132–137. [Google Scholar]
  9. Schon D. The reflective practitioner. London: Basic Books, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  10. Dias RD, Riley W, Shann K, Likosky DS, Fitzgerald D, Yule S. A tool to assess nontechnical skills of perfusionists in the cardiac operating room. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2023;165(4):1462–1469. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Melchior RW, Rosenthal T, Schiavo K, Frey T, Rogers D, Patel J, Holt DW. A systematic evaluation of the core communication skills expected on a perfusionist. Perfusion 2012;27(1):43–48. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Searles B, Darling E, Riley J, Wiles JR. Fundamental clinical skills of adult cardiopulmonary bypass results of the 2017 national survery. Perfusion 2019;34(4):290–296. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Gierig S, Merkle F, Pawelke C, Muller-Plath G. Simulation in perfusion: evaluating the efficacy of a specific training with eye tracking. Perfusion 2020;35(8):717–723. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Sistino JJ, Michaud NM, Sievert AN, Shackelford AG. Incorporating high fidelity simulation into perfusion education. Perfusion 2011;26(5):390–394. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Long DM, Matthews E, Edvidence-based practice knowledge and perfusionists’ clinical behavior. Perfusion 2016;31(2):119–124. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Lindahl B, Dagborn K, Nilsson M. A student-centered clinical educational unit – description of a relective learning model. Nurse Educ Pract 2009;9:5–12. [Google Scholar]
  17. Brownstein L, Rettie CS, George CM. A programme to prepare instructors for clinical teaching. Perfusion 1998;13(1):59–65. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Pien LC, Stiber M, Prelosky A, Colbert CY. Interprofessional educator development build it and they will come. Perspect Med Educ 2018;7:214–218. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Donovan LM, Strunk JA, Lam C, et al. Enhancing the prelicensure clinical learning experience: a student-centered learning approach. Nurse Educ 2022;47(2):108–113. [Google Scholar]
  20. Riley JB. Job analysis and student assessment tool: perfusion education clinical preceptor. J Extra Corpor Technol 2007;39:183–187. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Mollman S, Bondmass MD. Intentional learning: a student centered pedagogy. Int J Nurs Educ Scholarsh 2020;20190097. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Sujata B, Oliveras E, Edson WN. How can self-assessment improve the quality of healthcare? Operations Research Issue Paper 2(4). USA: US Agency for International Development; 2001. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.