Issue |
J Extra Corpor Technol
Volume 28, Number 2, June 1996
|
|
---|---|---|
Page(s) | 71 - 78 | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/ject/199628271 | |
Published online | 18 August 2023 |
Original Article
Significant Safety Advantages Gained with an Improved PressureRegulated Blood Pump
1
MC3, Inc. Ann Arbor, Michigan
2
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
* Address correspondence to: J. Patrick Montoya, PhD MC3, Inc. 245 Jackson Industrial Drive Suite J Ann Arbor, Ml48103
A prototype of a non-occlusive pressure-regulated blood pump (M-pump) was evaluated in-vitro for safety in a comparative study with the roller and centrifugal pumps. The M-pump consists of collapsible tubing of unique design wrapped under tension around a rotor without a stator. The prototype M-pumps were tested in vitro to evaluate performance with respect to flow/pressure characteristics, hemolysis, bubble generation (cavitation) and durability. The M-pump and centrifugal pump did not overpressurize at any RPM when the pump outlet was occluded, but the roller pump reached pressures in excess of 1000 mmHg. The M-pump did not generate negative pressures upon occlusion of the inlet, whereas the roller and centrifugal pumps produced near-vacuum pressures. Furthermore, the M-pump was unable to empty a blood reservoir when the height of the pump inlet was placed slightly above the reservoir outlet. The levels of micro bubbles in the M-pump were significantly lower than the roller and centrifugal pumps upon sudden restriction of the pump inlet as determined with an ultrasonic bubble detector. The results of our in-vitro evaluation of the M-pump have shown it to have lower hemolysis than the centrifugal pump and lower or comparable hemolysis to roller pumps at flowrates of 0.1, 0.5, 4.0 and 6 L/min. We determined that the M-pump design possesses important safety advantages over roller and centrifugal pumps for cardiopulmonary bypass applications.
Key words: cardiopulmonary bypass / non-occlusive pump / centrifugal pump / roller pump / safety
© 1996 AMSECT
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.