Issue |
J Extra Corpor Technol
Volume 38, Number 3, September 2006
|
|
---|---|---|
Page(s) | 206 - 213 | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/ject/200638206 | |
Published online | 15 September 2006 |
Abstract
In Vitro Evaluation of the Air Separation Ability of Four Cardiovascular Manufacturer Extracorporeal Circuit Designs
* Fresenius Medical Care Extracorporeal Alliance, San Diego, California
† Circulation Technology Division, School of Allied Medical Professions, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
Address correspondence to: Timothy Dickinson, One Westbrook Corporate Center, 7th Floor, Westchester, IL 60154-5701. E-mail: Tim.Dickinson@fmc-na.com.
Neurologic impairment is a common complication of adult cardiac surgery. Cerebral gaseous microemboli (GME) detected during cardiopulmonary bypass has been associated with cognitive impairment after adult cardiac surgery. Several previous studies have shown that components comprising the extra-corporeal circuit (ECC) can affect the ability of the ECC to eliminate air. The differences in the air separation ability of four manufacturer’s commonly used ECCs were studied. The air-separating ability of Cobe Cardiovascular, Gish Biomedical, Medtronic, and Terumo Cardiovascular Systems Corp. ECCs were studied in vitro under clinically relevant conditions. Bolus and continuous venous air were introduced and output GME patterns by size, time, and count were measured (using an embolus detection device) and statistically analyzed. Graphic representations depicting elapsed time, GME size, and bubble count helped to visually rank the air-handling performance of the ECCs. There are significant air-handling differences between the ECCs tested. Overall, the blinded results reveal that ECC A and ECC C removed significantly (p < 0.001) more suspended GME than ECC B and ECC D. In the 50-mL venous room-air bolus and the 100 mL/min pulsed air challenges, ECC B and ECC D allowed significantly more GME to pass (p < 0.001) compared with ECC A and ECC C. For example, in a 2-hour pump run ECC C would deliver 480 potential high-intensity transient signals (HITS) compared with the 9600 from the ECC B during venous room air entrainment at 100 mL/min. There are substantial and significant air-handling differences between the ECCs from the four different manufacturers. The results from this work allow for objective characterization of ECCs air-separating ability. This additional information provides an opportunity for clinicians to potentially minimize the risks of arterial air embolization and its associated deleterious neurologic effects, while allowing clinicians to make better-informed consumer decisions.
Key words: gaseous microemboli / high-intensity transient signals / extracorporeal circuit / in vitro study
© 2006 AMSECT
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.