| Issue |
J Extra Corpor Technol
Volume 41, Number 3, September 2009
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Page(s) | 172 - 179 | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/ject/200941172 | |
| Published online | 15 September 2009 | |
Abstract
A 2007 Survey of Extracorporeal Life Support Members: Personnel and Equipment
Perfusion Technology Department, Rush University, Chicago, Illinois
Address correspondence to: Robin G. Sutton, MS, CCP, Rush University, Perfusion Technology Department, 600 South Paulina, Chicago, IL 60612. E-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Received:
31
October
2008
Accepted:
17
May
2009
Abstract
Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is used to support patients with cardiopulmonary failure in the intensive care unit. The purpose of this study is to determine what professional qualifications, equipment, and tests are used by established ECMO programs registered with the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO). A survey link (Survey-Monkey) was e-mailed to the 110 registered ELSO program coordinators. Forty-nine responses were received. A test of binomial portions showed that nurses were more likely to be ECMO providers than respiratory therapists or perfusionists (p < .05). A χ2 test identified a difference in the type of pump (roller or centrifugal) based on patient age (p < .005). The most common monitoring/safety devices were battery back-up (84%), pre- and post-oxygenator pressure (82%), mixed venous oxygen saturation (80%), venous line pressure (76%), blood flowmeter (63%), bubble detector (61%), point-of-care blood gases (59%), and in-line blood gas monitoring (47%). Laboratory tests available included d-dimer (65%), plasma-free hemoglobin (63%), anti-Xa plasma heparin concentration (43%), thromboelastograph (37%), and heparin concentration using protamine titration (35%). This survey of ELSO-registered centers represents an overview of current ECMO practices.
Key words: extracorporeal membrane oxygenation / survey
Presented at the 46th International Conference American Society of ExtraCorporeal Technology, Orlando, Florida, April 8–12, 2008.
The senior author has stated that authors have reported no material, financial, or other relationship with any healthcare-related business or other entity whose products or services are discussed in this paper.
© 2009 AMSECT
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.
