EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 43 / No 3 (September 2011) J Extra Corpor Technol, 43 3 (2011) 115-122 References
Free Access
Issue
J Extra Corpor Technol
Volume 43, Number 3, September 2011
Page(s) 115 - 122
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/ject/201143115
Published online 15 September 2011
  1. Dinh DT, Lee GA, Billah B, Smith JA, Shardey GC, Reid C. Trends in coronary artery bypass graft surgery in Victoria, 2001–2006: Findings from the Australasian Society of Cardiac and Thoracic Surgeons database project. Med J Aust. 2008;188:214–7. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Newman MF, Matthew JP, Grocott HP, et al. Central nervous system injury associated with cardiac surgery. Lancet. 2006;368:694–703. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Hammon JW, Stump DA, Kon ND, et al. Risk factors and solutions for the development of neurobehavioural changes after coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg. 1997;63:1613–8. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Groom RC, Quinn RD, Lennon P, et al. Detection and elimination of microemboli related to cardiopulmonary bypass. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2009;2:191–8. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Gerriets T, Schwarz N, Sammer G, et al. Protecting the brain from gaseous and solid micro-emboli during coronary artery bypass grafting: A randomized controlled trial. Eur Heart J. 2010;31:360–8. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Abu-Omar Y, Balacumaraswami L, Pigott DW, Matthews PM, Taggart DP. Solid and gaseous cerebral microembolisation during off-pump, on-pump, and open cardiac surgery procedures. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2004;127:1759–65. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Taylor RL, Borger MA, Weisel RD, Fedorka L, Feindel CM. Cerebral microemboli during cardiopulmonary bypass: Increased emboli during perfusionist interventions. Ann Thorac Surg. 1999;68:89–93. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Nielsen PF, Funder JA, Jenson MO, Nygaard H. Influence of venous reservoir level on microbubbles in cardiopulmonary bypass. Perfusion. 2008;23:347–53. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Myers GJ, Voorhees C, Haynes R, Eke B. Post-arterial filter gaseous microemboli activity of five integral cardiotomy reservoirs during venting: An in vitro study. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2009;41:20–7. [Google Scholar]
  10. Borger MA, Peniston CM, Weisel RD, Vasiliou M, Green REA, Feindel CM. Neuropsychologic impairment after coronary bypass surgery: Effect of gaseous microemboli during perfusionist interventions. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2001;121:743–9. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Baker RA, Wilcox TW. Australian and New Zealand perfusion survey: Equipment and monitoring. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2006;38:220–9. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Mitchell SJ, Willcox T, McDougal C, Gorman DF. Emboli generation by the Medtronic maxima hard-shell adult venous reservoir in cardiopulmonary bypass circuits:A preliminary report. Perfusion. 1996;11:145–55. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Mitchell SJ, Willcox T. Bubble generation and venous air filtration by hard-shell venous reservoirs: A comparative study. Perfusion. 1997;12:325–33. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Tyndal CM, Berryessa R, Tornabene SP. An in vitro comparison of macro air passage in the venous reservoir bag. J Extra Corpor Technol. 1986;18:101–5. [Google Scholar]
  15. Riley JB. Arterial line filters ranked for gaseous micro-emboli separation performance: An in vitro study. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2008;40:21–6. [Google Scholar]
  16. De Somer F. Impact of oxygenator characteristics on its capability to remove gaseous microemboli. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2007;39: 271–3. [Google Scholar]
  17. Kurusz M, Butler BD, Katz J, Conti VR. Air embolism during cardiopulmonary bypass. Perfusion. 1995;10:361–91. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Dickinson TA, Riley JB, Crowley JC, Zabetakis PM. In vitro evaluation of the air separation ability of four cardiovascular manufacturer extra-corporeal circuit designs. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2006;38:206–13. [Google Scholar]
  19. Moehle DA. Neuromonitoring in the cardiopulmonary bypass surgical patient: Clinical applications. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2001;33:126–34. [Google Scholar]
  20. Rodriquez RA, Williams KA, Babaev A, Rubens F, Nathan HJ. Effect of the perfusionists technique on cerebral embolization during cardiopulmonary bypass. Perfusion. 2005;20:3–10. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Willcox TW, Mitchell SJ, Gorman DF. Venous air in the bypass circuit: A source of arterial line emboli exacerbated by vacuum-assisted drainage. Ann Thorac Surg. 1999;68:1285–9. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Jones TJ, Deal DD, Vernon JC, Blackburn N, Stump DA. Does vacuum-assisted venous drainage increase gaseous microemboli during cardiopulmonary bypass? Ann Thorac Surg. 2002;74:2132–7. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Rodriquez RA, Rubens F, Belway D, Nathan HJ. Residual air in the venous cannula increases cerebral embolization at the onset of cardiopulmonary bypass. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2006;29:175–80. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Hessel AE. Cardiopulmonary bypass circuitry and cannulation techniques. In: Hessel Gravlee GP, Davis RF, Utley JR, eds. Cardiopulmonary Bypass–Principles and Practice. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1993:55–92. [Google Scholar]
  25. Schönberger JPAM, Everts PAM, Hoffmann JJ. Systemic blood activation with open and closed venous reservoirs. Ann Thorac Surg. 1995;59:1549–55. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. Mahoney CB, Donnelly JE. Impact of closed versus open venous reservoirs on patient outcomes in isolated coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Perfusion. 2000;15:467–72. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Tanaka H, Oshiyama T, Narisawa T, et al. Clinical study of biocompatibility between open and closed heparin-coated cardiopulmonary bypass circuits. J Artif Organs. 2003;6:245–52. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Lilly KJ, O’Gara PJ, Treanor PR, et al. Heparin-bonded circuits without a cardiotomy: A description of a minimally invasive technique of cardiopulmonary bypass. Perfusion. 2002;17:95–7. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Eckmann DM, Armstead SC, Mardini F. Surfactants reduce platelet-bubble and platelet-platelet binding induced by in vitro air embolism. Anesthesiology. 2005;103:1204–10. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Sleep J, Syhre I, Evan E. Blood temperature management and gaseous microemboli creation: An in-vitro analysis. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2010;42:219–22. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Stump DA, Vernon JC, Deal DD. A comparison of the Hatteland CMD10 versus the embolus detection and classification system (Abstract). Outcomes 2004 Abstracts. Heart Surg Forum. 2004;7:E617–8. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.