Open Access
Issue
J Extra Corpor Technol
Volume 55, Number 1, March 2023
Page(s) 23 - 29
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/ject/2023003
Published online 24 March 2023

© The Author(s), published by EDP Sciences, 2023

Licence Creative CommonsThis is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Introduction

Postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) complicates 20–40% of cardiac surgical procedures [1]. Typical features include onset at 2–4 days postoperatively, episodes that are often fleeting, and a self-limited time course. Associated adverse consequences of POAF include hemodynamic instability, increased risk of stroke, lengthened hospital and intensive care unit stays, and greater costs [1].

The mechanisms of POAF are complex and incompletely defined, but include intraoperative and postoperative phenomena, such as inflammation, sympathetic activation, hypoxia, acidosis, oxidative stress, electrolyte abnormalities, and intra-atrial conduction delay that combine to trigger atrial fibrillation, often in the presence of pre-existing factors, making the atria vulnerable to atrial fibrillation induction and maintenance [1, 2]. To prevent POAF, preoperative beta-blocker (propranolol, carvedilol plus N-acetyl cysteine) use is associated with a reduced incidence of postoperative AF, but not major adverse events such as death, stroke, or acute kidney injury [3]. Data for other interventions such as statins, magnesium, colchicine, posterior pericardiotomy, atrial pacing, and corticosteroids are not robust. Two large randomized controlled studies showed no significant effect of i.v. steroids on the incidence of postoperative AF after cardiac surgery [4]. Thus, other modalities may be needed, although the molecular events initiating AF remain uncertain.

Considering that cytosolic Ca2+ handling is a major determinant of cardiac contractile function, Fakuade et al. hypothesized that alterations in cellular Ca2+ dynamics contribute to impaired atrial contractility in patients who proceed to develop POAF [5]. They found that reduced sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) Ca2+-ATPase (SERCA)-mediated Ca2+ reuptake into SR is a major contributor to impaired preoperative atrial contractile function [5]. Ryanodine receptors (calcium-induced calcium release channels; RyR) play a crucial role in most cell types, including muscle cells, neurons, and epithelial cells. They mediate the release of calcium ions from the endoplasmic/sarcoplasmic reticulum into the cytosol and thereby convert a number of extracellular stimuli into intracellular calcium signals [6]. RyRs are large tetrameric proteins that show sequence similarity with inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (IP3)-gated calcium channels of the endoplasmic/sarcoplasmic reticulum, but they are distinct in their biophysical and pharmacological properties. For example, highly negatively charged polyanions such as heparin increased the activity of RyRs, whereas it decreased the activity of IP3 receptors [7]. Diaz-Sylvester and Copello found that a lower dose of protamine activated cardiac RyR2 [8]. Shan et al. in mouse models with known RyR2 mutations and normal cardiac structure and function, the diastolic SR Ca2+ leak via RyR2 lead to Ca2+ waves and possible re-entry loops that trigger atrial tachycardia and AF [9].

In STS/SCA/AmSECT (Society of Thoracic Surgeons, The Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, and the American Society of ExtraCorporeal Technology) clinical practice guidelines published in 2018 [10], recommendations were written in the reversal of anticoagulation during cardiac operations. Methods of heparin reversal are multiple and controversy exists regarding the optimal strategy. Traditional methods administer heparin based on body weight and protamine based on the amount of heparin administered. An important part of the operation is to adequately remove all of the heparin effects at the end of the operation. There are at least three methods commonly used to detect residual heparin effect after protamine reversal. Among them, the ACT-based strategy is commonly used, where activated clotting time (ACT) measurement is kept greater than 480 s which seemed to be appropriate during cardiac surgical procedures in this study. Class IIa recommendation in the guidelines included limiting the ratio of protamine/heparin to less than 2.6 mg protamine/100 Units of heparin, since total doses above this ratio inhibit platelet function, prolong ACT, and increase the risk of bleeding [10].

Here, we have retrospectively reviewed 147 patients who underwent cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. All these patients received heparin followed by protamine at different dosing ratios of protamine-to-heparin, depending on the periods used. We have found that higher dosing ratios of protamine-to-heparin increased the incidence of POAF.

Materials and methods

Data Collection was conducted as a retrospective cohort study to clarify the prevalence and incidence of POAF in the patients who received cardiac surgery. The study protocol conformed to the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the institution’s ethics committee in Okanami General Hospital, Iga-City, Mie Prefecture, Japan. Okanami General Hospital is a secondary medical center in the Iga district. The study database was from the Okanami Hospital Medical Database which was composed of detailed medical and procedural information.

Atrial fibrillation and its occurrence time were identified by the diagnosis of health records and electrocardiograms. Comorbidities including hypertension, diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, heart failure, coronary artery disease, myocardial infarction, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, peripheral arterial occlusive disease, and chronic kidney disease were also coded from the records. Prescription information was categorized into antiarrhythmic agents, beta-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI), angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), mineralocorticoid-receptor antagonists, calcium blockers, digitalis preparation, sodium channel blocker, and anticoagulants. The open heart procedures included coronary artery bypass grafting, valvuloplasty, and valve replacement. The echocardiographic data and outcomes including transient ischemic attack, ischemic stroke, hospitalization, and mortality were also obtained from the electronic health records. Activated clotting time (ACT) was measured using Hemochron® (Accriva Diagnostics, San Diego, CA, USA) from April 1, 2002, to March 12, 2015, and ACT Plus® (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA) from March 13, 2015, and thereafter. ACT was determined before CPB, and then every 30 min. Additional heparin (1000–2000 IU) was administered if necessary. An ACT target of ≥ 480 s (≥ 480 s up to 600 s) was set in the hospital. All patients received unfractionated heparin (1000 international units/mL) and protamine (10 mg/mL), both are purchased from Mochida Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. (Tokyo, Japan). All patients received initial heparin doses of 300 IU/kg. The dosing ratios of protamine-to-heparin were determined by the volume-based method in the clinical setting, that is, the dosing ratio of protamine-to-heparin = 1.0 represents 1 mL protamine to 1 mL heparin of the first heparin bolus. This ratio is equal to 1 mg of protamine to 100 international units of heparin. The dosing ratios of protamine-to-heparin >1.0 (up to 1.7) were used from February 2004 to September 2009 and the dosing ratio of protamine-to-heparin = 1.0 from October 2009 and thereafter. The change of dosing ratios of protamine-to-heparin was made according to the instructions of the pharmaceutical company.

Patient Selection. In this study, all patients above 18 years of age undergoing first-time open-heart surgery at Okanami General Hospital from February 1, 2004, to December 13, 2021, were included for analysis (n = 147). In this retrospective study, we did not include off-pump CABG cases (n = 91) who did not receive protamine. Thus, the annual surgical volume is 14–16 patients per year in the Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Okanami General Hospital. Patients with previous documented AF (n = 40), who received anticoagulant therapy within 6 months before the open heart surgery or during the follow-up period, could not survive the open-heart procedures, and could not receive regular follow-up at the out-patient clinics were all excluded from the analysis. The definition of POAF was new-onset AF, which is sustained for over 30 s, and detected by either continuous telemetry in the intensive care unit, standard 12-lead electrocardiogram, or implanted devices. All medical records were followed until their last clinical visit, repeat cardiac surgery or death. The index date of outcomes was defined as the date of diagnosis.

Statistical analysis. All statistical analyses were performed using EZR software (available free of charge at the website of Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University, Saitama, Japan) [11], which is a graphical user interface for the program R (The R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria). The software is a modified version of R commander software (version 2.4-0) that contains additional statistical functions frequently used in biostatistics. Results were expressed as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) from logistic regressions. Fischer’s exact test and chi-square test were used to analyze frequency distributions. The t-test was used to determine whether differences in the means of two sets of samples were significant. A P-value less than 0.05 was considered significant.

Results

A total of 147 patients received cardiac surgery between February 1, 2004, to December 13, 2021, of which 40 patients were excluded because of pre-existing AF. After excluding patients with pre-existing AF, a total of 107 patients were enrolled in this cohort. Table 1 reports odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals from logistic regression analysis of POAF incidence. As shown in Table 1, statistical significance in patients with POAF was not observed in age (67.7 ± 12.3 vs. 69.2 ± 7.3, p = 0.848), gender (67.4 vs. 66.7%, p = 0.717), BMI (23.0 ± 3.8 vs. 23.2 ± 4.5, p = 0.908), hypertension (45.7 vs. 46.7%, p = 0.136), and diabetes (25.0 vs. 40.0%, p = 0.426) in this cohort. The chances of taking anti-arrhythmic agents such as beta-blockers were similar in both groups (42.4 vs. 46.7%, p = 0.79). POAF developed in 15 patients (15/107 = 14%), of these, 5 out of 57 patients (33.3%) in the dosing ratio of protamine-to-heparin = 1.0 and 10 out of 35 patients (66.7%) in the higher dosing ratios of protamine-to-heparin. Compared to individuals using dosing ratios of protamine-to-heparin >1.0 (up to 1.7), dosing ratios of protamine-to-heparin = 1.0 was associated with reduced risk of POAF (OR = 3.890, CI: 1.130–13.300, p = 0.031). As shown in Table 2, when types of diseases (surgeries) were analyzed in terms of higher dosing ratios of protamine-to-heparin, only valvular disorders were significantly associated with POAF (p = 0.04).

Table 1

Patient demographics and drug effects on POAF.

Table 2

Types of cardiovascular diseases and dosing ratios of protamine-to-heparin.

Discussion

In this study, we investigated retrospectively the development of POAF after cardiac surgery, based on the recent reports concerning altered Ca2+ kinetics in POAF. As for risk factors of POAF, Yamashita et al. recently performed a systematic review and meta-analysis and identified that older age and a history of heart failure were significant risk factors for POAF whether the included studies were prospective or retrospective data sets [12]. Our clinical data suggested that higher dosing ratios of protamine-to-heparin also increased the incidence of POAF.

The advantages of unfractionated heparin are its rapid onset of action, clinical efficacy, rapid neutralization by protamine, safety, and low cost. The dose of heparin used to prevent blood clotting during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) is 300–400 U/kg plus additional doses to achieve and maintain an ACT of greater than 480 s [13]. Historically, an ACT target of ≥ 480 s has been considered adequate, although due to the varying measurement methods, there is often a poor correlation between different devices [14]. The individual response to a fixed dose of heparin may vary. Higher doses of heparin may result in better thrombin inhibition, thereby preserving coagulation factors on CPB. Reversing heparin with protamine should be done after separation from CPB. The appropriate dose in relation to the amount of heparin administered is critically important. A common error is to administer additional protamine with ongoing microvascular oozing in the surgical field, despite an absence of evidence that coagulopathy is related to residual heparin [10, 13]. Furthermore, additional protamine can itself have an anticoagulant effect by impairing thrombin generation and potentiating fibrinolysis. The impact of the high protamine-to-heparin ratio on coagulation time was studied by Mittermayr et al. either in-vitro or in the clinical setting [15]. In a joint effort, the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS) and the European Association of Cardiothoracic Anaesthesiology (EACTA) provide evidence-based recommendations in adult-acquired cardiac surgery. It is advised not to exceed a protamine dose in a 1:1 ratio to the initial heparin bolus [16]. Bartoszko et al. also suggested in the recent review article that dosing ratios of protamine-to-heparin have generally been kept no higher than 1:1 [13]. Accumulating evidence supports lower ratios, such as 0.6–1 mg/kg protamine per 100 IU/kg of heparin, as being associated with decreased transfusion and chest drain output [17, 18]. Recently, Lee et al. reported in this journal that they performed a retrospective study of 216 patients who underwent cardiac surgery to search for a safe minimum protamine dose when measuring heparin concentration, using Heparin Management System (HMS) Plus that calculates a patient's heparin dose-responsiveness curve for a target ACT value [19]. When the protamine-to-heparin ratio is set at 1 mg protamine to 100 international unit heparin, they determined that 75% of the calculated total protamine dose is a safe minimum protamine dose to sufficiently neutralize circulating heparin after CPB. On average, this translates into either .37 mg protamine/100 IU heparin of total heparin dose or .54 mg/100 IU of the first heparin bolus [19]. These studies may suggest that a lower protamine-to-heparin ratio is feasible in these clinical settings. Prospective randomized trials may be required to elucidate this issue.

It has been reported that large doses of protamine (>20 mcg/mL) block single skeletal RyR1 channels and inhibit RyR1-mediated Ca2+ release from sarcoplasmic reticulum microsomes [6]. Diaz-Sylvester and Copello extended these studies to cardiac RyR2 reconstituted into planar lipid bilayers [8]. They found that protamine (0.02–20 mcg/mL) added to the cytosolic surface of fully activated RyR2 affected channel activity in a voltage-dependent manner. They observed a full block of cardiac RyR2 in the presence of 20 mcg/mL protamine. Protamine did not simply block RyR2 in an all-or-none fashion. Rather, it affected the RyR2 channel conduction pathway by producing substates and full blocks in a voltage-dependent and dose-dependent manner. The addition of heparin (250 mcg/mL), known to bind protamine with very high affinity, reversed the effect of protamine on RyR2. This reversibility suggests that the action of protamine was not related to the dissociation of any cofactor or modulatory subunit bound to the RyR2 channel. Their results open the possibility that direct protamine binding to RyR2 could mediate, at least in part, the observed abnormalities in SR Ca2+ homeostasis [8]. Our clinical observation may support theirs in vitro results.

Adverse effects of protamine include anaphylactic reactions caused by an injection of protamine during cardiac surgery are well-known complications [17, 20]. Gertler et al. observed that platelet function worsens with protamine to heparin ratio higher than 1:1 in blood samples taken from ten healthy volunteers [21]. Similar impairment of platelet aggregation and function with the use of protamine to heparin ratio above 2.6:1, was demonstrated by Carr and Silverman [22]. Protamine has also been shown to display immunological and inflammatory alterations [17].

POAF, defined as new-onset AF in the immediate postoperative period, is a clinically relevant problem, occurring in 20–40% of patients after cardiac surgery, with the peak incidence between postoperative days 2 and 4 [1]. Intra- and postoperative changes affecting AF triggers and pre-existing atrial substrate may increase atrial vulnerability to AF. Many episodes of POAF are self-terminating and some are asymptomatic, but POAF has been associated with a four- to the five-fold risk of recurrent AF in the next 5 years. It has also been shown to be a risk factor for stroke, myocardial infarction, and death compared with non-postoperative AF patients [3, 4]. The pathogenesis of POAF may be multifactorial. β-Adrenergic stimulation has been implicated in the pathogenesis of POAF [23]. Some surgeries are more likely to induce POAF [24]. Specifically, patients who undergo combined surgeries, such as combined valve and coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgeries, are twice as likely to develop POAF, up to 60% [25]. When types of surgery (diseases) were analyzed in terms of higher dosing ratios of protamine-to-heparin (Table 2), only valvular disorders were marginally associated with POAF (p = 0.04). In Figure 1A, Fakuade et al. provide the evidence in vitro that impaired SR Ca2+ uptake is a common underlying mechanism that contributes both to the impaired pre-existing atrial contractile function as an independent risk factor of POAF and to the arrhythmogenic substrate, which predisposes patients to the development of POAF [5]. Based on the clinical results, we propose a hypothetical model of protamine-related POAF in Figure 1B. In the case of higher dosing ratios of protamine-to-heparin, the residual protamine may activate RyR2 dose-dependently, followed by RyR2-mediated Ca2+ leak, resulting in increased cytosolic Ca2+ and POAF. In the current retrospective study, POAF developed both in 5 of 57 patients (33.3%) in the dosing ratio of protamine-to-heparin = 1.0 and 10 out of 35 patients (66.7%) in the higher dosing ratios of protamine-to-heparin (Table 2). Statistical analysis showed that POAF was associated with higher dosing ratios of protamine-to-heparin >1.0 up to 1.7 and was statistically significant (odds ratio = 3.890, 95% CI = 1.130–13.300, p-value = 0.031). POAF development in the dosing ratio of protamine-to-heparin = 1.0 may suggest that residual protamine has some adverse effect on inducing POAF. If this is the case, a lower protamine-to-heparin ratio (less than protamine-to-heparin = 1.0) may be used to prevent POAF, as discussed above [19]. Further studies are needed to elucidate this issue.

thumbnail Figure 1

A hypothetical model illustrating the Ca2+ signaling pathways implicated in POAF. Cytosolic Ca2+ handling abnormalities in atrial myocytes have been suggested to play an important role in the initiation and maintenance of atrial fibrillation. (A) Fakuade et al. reported that sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) Ca2+ leak and ryanodine receptor channel (RyR2) function in atrial myocytes. Reduced SERCA-mediated Ca2+ reuptake into the SR is a major contributor to impaired preoperative atrial contractile function and the pre-existing arrhythmogenic substrate in patients developing POAF. Therefore, modulation of SERCA activity may represent a novel mechanistic target to prevent the development of POAF. (B) With higher dosing ratios of protamine-to-heparin, the residual protamine may activate RyR2 dose-dependently, followed by RyR2-mediated Ca2+ leak, resulting in increased cytosolic Ca2+ and POAF. Therefore, dosing ratios of protamine-to-heparin may be an important determinant in the development of POAF in addition to reduced SERCA-mediated Ca2+ reuptake into the SR described in Figure 1A. POAF, postoperative atrial fibrillation; SR, sarcoplasmic reticulum; SERCA, sarcoplasmic reticulum calcium ATPase (sarcoplasmic reticulum calcium pump).

Limitations

The study has some limitations. First, this small study is a retrospective analysis of an integrated database from a secondary medical center in the Iga district, Mie, Japan. Second, AF was identified by diagnostic code, electrocardiogram, and medical history, not by a long-term recorder, some patients with AF might be underdiagnosed. Furthermore, although potential arrhythmogenic mechanisms for POAF development may be associated with higher dosing ratios of protamine-to-heparin as shown in this study, there may be additional factors predisposing to the development of POAF, including genetic, type of surgery, autonomic nervous system, inflammation, and pre-existing fibrosis.

Conclusion

In conclusion, our results provide evidence that higher dosing ratios of protamine-to-heparin may increase the incidence of POAF. In this regard, STS/SCA/AmSECT and EACTS/EACTA clinical guidelines on anticoagulation during cardiopulmonary bypass are useful in clinical practice.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank N. Takai, MD, Department of Anesthesiology, Okanami General Hospital for kindly providing patients’ information, H. Ko, PhD, Department of Clinical Engineering, Faculty of Medical Engineering, Suzuka University of Medical Science, for statistical advice.

Conflict of interest

Authors declared no conflict of interest.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific funding.

Data availability

All available data are incorporated into the article.

Ethics

Data Collection was conducted as a retrospective cohort study to clarify the prevalence and incidence of POAF in the patients who received cardiac surgery. The study protocol conformed to the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the institution ethics committee in Okanami General Hospital, Iga-City, Mie Prefecture, Japan. Medical research is subject to ethical standards that promote and ensure respect for all human subjects and protect their health and rights.

Authors’ contributions

Y.Y. and E.A. designed the studies. Y.Y., J.I., A.K., J.M., E.A. performed the research and analyzed the data. Y.Y., N.T., Y.K., M.Y., E.A. provided expertise in clinical data analysis. Y.Y. and E.A. wrote the manuscript, and all authors contributed to the final version.

References

  1. Dobrev D, Aguilar M, Heijman J, Guichard JB, Nattel S (2019) Postoperative atrial fibrillation: mechanisms, manifestations and management. Nat Rev Cardiol 16(7), 417–36. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Papathanasiou KA, Giotaki SG, Vrachatis DA, et al. (2021) Molecular insights in atrial fibrillation pathogenesis and therapeutics: a narrative review. Diagnostics (Basel) 11(9), 1584. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Hsu JC, Huang CY, Chuang SL, et al. (2021) Long term outcome of postoperative atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery – a propensity score-matched cohort analysis. Front Cardiovasc Med 8, 650147. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. (2021) 2020 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS): The Task Force for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Developed with the special contribution of the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) of the ESC. Eur Heart J 42(5), 373–498. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Fakuade FE, Steckmeister V, Seibertz F, et al. (2021) Altered atrial cytosolic calcium handling contributes to the development of postoperative atrial fibrillation. Cardiovasc Res 117(7), 1790–801. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Koulen P, Ehrlich BE (2000) Reversible block of the calcium release channel/ryanodine receptor by protamine, a heparin antidote. Mol Biol Cell 11(7), 2213–9. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bezprozvanny IB, Ondrias K, Kaftan E, Stoyanovsky DA, Ehrlich BE (1993) Activation of the calcium release channel (ryanodine receptor) by heparin and other polyanions is calcium dependent. Mol Biol Cell 4(3), 347–52. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Diaz-Sylvester PL, Copello JA (2009) Voltage-dependent modulation of cardiac ryanodine receptors (RyR2) by protamine. PLoS One 4(12), e8315. [Google Scholar]
  9. Shan J, Xie W, Betzenhauser M, et al. (2012) Calcium leak through ryanodine receptors leads to atrial fibrillation in 3 mouse models of catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia. Circ Res 111(6), 708–17. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Shore-Lesserson L, Baker RA, Ferraris V, et al. (2018) STS/SCA/AmSECT Clinical Practice Guidelines: Anticoagulation during Cardiopulmonary Bypass. J Extra Corpor Technol 50(1), 5–18. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kanda Y. 2013. Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software “EZR” for medical statistics. Bone Marrow Transplant 48(3), 452–8. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Yamashita K, Hu N, Ranjan R, Selzman CH, Dosdall DJ (2019) Clinical risk factors for postoperative atrial fibrillation among patients after cardiac surgery. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 67(2), 107–16. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Bartoszko J, Karkouti K (2021) Managing the coagulopathy associated with cardiopulmonary bypass. J Thromb Haemost 19(3), 617–32. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Dirkmann D, Nagy E, Britten MW, Peters J (2019) Point-of-care measurement of activated clotting time for cardiac surgery as measured by the Hemochron signature elite and the Abbott i-STAT: agreement, concordance, and clinical reliability. BMC Anesthesiol 19(1), 174. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Mittermayr M, Velik-Salchner C, Stalzer B, et al. (2009) Detection of protamine and heparin after termination of cardiopulmonary bypass by thrombelastometry (ROTEM): results of a pilot study. Anesth Analg 108(3), 743–50. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Task Force on Patient Blood Management for Adult Cardiac Surgery of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic S, the European Association of Cardiothoracic A, Boer C, Meesters MI, Milojevic M, Benedetto U, et al. (2018) 2017 EACTS/EACTA Guidelines on patient blood management for adult cardiac surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 32(1), 88–120. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Boer C, Meesters MI, Veerhoek D, Vonk ABA (2018) Anticoagulant and side-effects of protamine in cardiac surgery: a narrative review. Br J Anaesth 120(5), 914–27. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kunz SA, Miles LF, Ianno DJ, Mirowska-Allen KL, et al. (2018) The effect of protamine dosing variation on bleeding and transfusion after heparinisation for cardiopulmonary bypass. Perfusion 33(6), 445–52. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Lee MH, Riley W, Shann KG (2021) Can the minimum protamine dose to neutralize heparin at the completion of cardiopulmonary bypass be significantly lower than the conventional practice? J Extra Corpor Technol 53(3), 170–176. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Nybo M, Madsen JS (2008) Serious anaphylactic reactions due to protamine sulfate: a systematic literature review. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol 103(2), 192–196. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Gertler R, Wiesner G, Tassani-Prell P, Braun SL, Martin K. 2011. Are the point-of-care diagnostics MULTIPLATE and ROTEM valid in the setting of high concentrations of heparin and its reversal with protamine? J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 25(6), 981–986. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Carr JA, Silverman N. 1999. The heparin-protamine interaction. A review. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 40(5), 659–666. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Maesen B, Nijs J, Maessen J, Allessie M, Schotten U (2012) Post-operative atrial fibrillation: a maze of mechanisms. Europace 14(2), 159–74. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Mitchell LB, Exner DV, Wyse DG, et al. (2005) Prophylactic oral amiodarone for the prevention of arrhythmias that begin early after revascularization, valve replacement, or repair: PAPABEAR: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA, 294(24), 3093–3100. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Lohchab SS, Kumar A. 2020. Post-operative atrial fibrillation after off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 36(1), 4–5. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Cite this article as: Yamada Y, Iemura J, Kambara A, Tateishi N, Kozaki Y, Yamada M, Maruyama J, & Azuma E. Association of postoperative atrial fibrillation with higher dosing ratios of protamine-to-heparin. J Extra Corpor Technol 2023, 55, 23–29

All Tables

Table 1

Patient demographics and drug effects on POAF.

Table 2

Types of cardiovascular diseases and dosing ratios of protamine-to-heparin.

All Figures

thumbnail Figure 1

A hypothetical model illustrating the Ca2+ signaling pathways implicated in POAF. Cytosolic Ca2+ handling abnormalities in atrial myocytes have been suggested to play an important role in the initiation and maintenance of atrial fibrillation. (A) Fakuade et al. reported that sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) Ca2+ leak and ryanodine receptor channel (RyR2) function in atrial myocytes. Reduced SERCA-mediated Ca2+ reuptake into the SR is a major contributor to impaired preoperative atrial contractile function and the pre-existing arrhythmogenic substrate in patients developing POAF. Therefore, modulation of SERCA activity may represent a novel mechanistic target to prevent the development of POAF. (B) With higher dosing ratios of protamine-to-heparin, the residual protamine may activate RyR2 dose-dependently, followed by RyR2-mediated Ca2+ leak, resulting in increased cytosolic Ca2+ and POAF. Therefore, dosing ratios of protamine-to-heparin may be an important determinant in the development of POAF in addition to reduced SERCA-mediated Ca2+ reuptake into the SR described in Figure 1A. POAF, postoperative atrial fibrillation; SR, sarcoplasmic reticulum; SERCA, sarcoplasmic reticulum calcium ATPase (sarcoplasmic reticulum calcium pump).

In the text

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.