Free Access
Issue
J Extra Corpor Technol
Volume 38, Number 3, September 2006
Page(s) 220 - 229
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/ject/200638220
Published online 15 September 2006
  1. Wajon PR, Walsh RG, Symons NLP. A survey of cardiopulmonary bypass perfusion practices in Australia in 1992. Anaesth Intens Care. 1993;21:814–21. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Jenkins OF, Morris M, Simpson JM. Australasian perfusion incident survey. Perfusion. 1997;12:279–88. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Silvay G, Ammar T, Reich DL, Vela-Cantos F, Joffe D, Ergin AM. Cardiopulmonary bypass for adult patients: A survey of equipment and techniques. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 1995;9:420–4. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Stammers AH, Mejak BL, Rauch ED, Vang SN, Viessman TW. Factors affecting perfusionists’ decisions on equipment utilization: Results of a United States survey. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2000;32:4–10. [Google Scholar]
  5. Lilley A. The selection of priming fluids for cardiopulmonary bypass in the UK and Ireland. Perfusion. 2002;17:315–20. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cecere G, Groom R, Forest R, Quinn R, Morton J. A 10-year review of pediatric perfusion practice in North America. Perfusion. 2002;17:83–9. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Charriere JM, Durand C, Mandon N, et al. French national survey of the use of monitoring devices during cardiopulmonary bypass in 2001. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 2003;22:414–20. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Groom RC, Froebe S, Martin J, et al. Update on pediatric perfusion practice in North America: 2005 Survey. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2005;37:343–50. [Google Scholar]
  9. Australasian Society of Cardiovascular Perfusionists Inc. Standards of practice in clinical perfusion within Australasia. Available at www.perfusion.com.au Accessed March 23, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  10. Cockroft SJ. Use of monitoring devices during anesthesia for cardiac surgery: A survey of practices at public hospitals within the United Kingdom and Ireland. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 1994;8:382–5. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Feneck RO. Standards of monitoring. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 1994;8:379–91. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Recommendations for Standards of Monitoring and Alarms during Cardiopulmonary Bypass. Available at www.sopgbi.org, www.acta.org.uk, and www.scts.org Accessed March 23, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  13. Grocott HP, Newman MF, Croughwell ND, White WD, Lowry E, Reves JG. Continuous jugular venous versus nasopharyngeal temperature monitoring during hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass for cardiac surgery. J Clin Anesth. 1997;9:312–6. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Johnson RI, Fox MA, Grayson A, Jackson M, Fabri BM. Should we rely on nasopharyngeal temperature during cardiopulmonary bypass? Perfusion. 2002;17:145–51. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Marino M, Cheng W, Romagnoli A, Walding D, Nussmeier N. Temperature bias: Jugular bulb venous temperature versus conventional sites. Ann Thorac Surg. 2000;70:1792. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Shann KG, Likosky DS, Murkin JM, Baker RA, Baribeau YR, De-Foe GR, Dickinson TA, Gardner TJ, Grocott HP, O’Connor GT, Rosinski DJ, Selke FW, Willcox TW. An evidence-based approach to improving the practice of cardiopulmonary bypass in adults. A focus on neurological injury, glycemic control, hemodilution and the inflammatory response. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg (in press). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.