EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 39 / No 3 (September 2007) J Extra Corpor Technol, 39 3 (2007) 192-198 References
Free Access
Issue
J Extra Corpor Technol
Volume 39, Number 3, September 2007
Page(s) 192 - 198
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/ject/200739192
Published online 15 September 2007
  1. Taylor RL, Borger MA, Weisel RD, et al. Cerebral microemboli during cardiopulmonary bypass: Increased emboli during perfusionist intervention. Ann Thorac Surg. 1999;68:89–93. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Nijhoff M. Microembolization: Etiology and prevention. In: Hilberman M, ed. Brain Injury and Protection During Heart Surgery. Martinus-Nijhoff Publishing, Boston, MA; 1998; 67–83. [Google Scholar]
  3. Pugsley W. The use of Doppler ultrasound in the assessment of microemboli during cardiac surgery. Perfusion. 1989;4:115–22. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Clark RE, Brillman J, Davis DA, et al. Microemboli during coronary artery bypass grafting: Genesis and effect on outcome. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1995;109:249–58. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Stock UA, Miller T, Bienek R, et al. Deairing of the venous drainage in standard extracorporeal circulation results in a profound reduction of arterial micro bubbles. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006;54:39–41. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Mitchell SJ, Willcox T, Gorman DF. Bubble generation and venous air filtration by hard-shell reservoirs: A comparative study. Perfusion. 1997;12:325–33. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Padayachee TS, Parsons S, Theoboldt R, et al. The effect of arterial filtration on reduction of gaseous microemboli in the middle cerebral artery during cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg. 1988;45: 647–9. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Schoenburg M, Kraus B, Muehling A, et al. The dynamic air bubble trap reduces cerebral microembolism during cardiopulmonary bypass. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2004;128:154–62. [Google Scholar]
  9. Stump DA, Rogers AT, Hammon JW, et al. Cerebral emboli and cognitive outcome after cardiac surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 1996;10:113–19. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Borger MA, Peniston CM, Weisel RD, et al. Neuropsychologic impairment after coronary bypass surgery: Effect of gaseous microemboli during perfusionist interventions. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2001;121:743–9. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Rodriguez RA, Williams KA, Babaev A, et al. Effect of perfusionist technique on cerebral embolization during cardiopulmonary bypass. Perfusion. 2005;20:3–10. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Rudolph JL, Tilahun D, Treanor PR, et al. Use of a large bore syringe creates significantly fewer high intensity transient signals (HITS) into a cardiopulmonary bypass system than a small bore syringe. Perfusion. 2006;21:67–71. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Berne RM, Levy MN. The microcirculation and lymphatics. In: Cardiovascular Physiology. 4th ed. CV Mosby, St. Louis, MO; 1981;109–22. [Google Scholar]
  14. Muth CM, Shank ES. Gas embolism. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:476–82. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Barak M, Katz Y. Microbubbles: Pathophysiology and clinical implications. Chest. 2005;128:2918–32. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Lindner JR, Song J, Jayaweera AR, et al. Microvascular rheology of definity microbubbles after intra-arterial and intravenous administration. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2002;15:396–403. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Branger AB, Eckmann DM. Theoretical and experimental intravascular gas embolism absorption dynamics. J Appl Physiol. 1999;87:1287–95. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.