EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 42 / No 1 (March 2010) J Extra Corpor Technol, 42 1 (2010) 30-39 References
Free Access
Issue
J Extra Corpor Technol
Volume 42, Number 1, March 2010
Page(s) 30 - 39
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/ject/201042030
Published online 15 March 2010
  1. Boettcher W, Merkle F, Weitkemper HH. History of extracorporeal circulation: The conceptional and developmental period. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2003;35:172–83. [Google Scholar]
  2. Wippermann J, Albes JM, Hartrumpf M. Comparison of minimally invasive closed circuit extracorporeal circulation with conventional cardiopulmonary bypass and with off-pump technique in CABG patients: Selected parameters of coagulation and inflammatory system. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2005;28:127–32. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Abdel-Rahman U, Ozaslan F, Risteski PS, et al. Initial experience with a minimized extracorporeal bypass system: Is there a clinical benefit? Ann Thorac Surg. 2005;80:238–43. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Wiesenack C, Liebold A, Philipp A, et al. Four years’ experience with a miniaturized extracorporeal circulation system and its influence on clinical outcome. Artif Organs. 2004;28:1082–8. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Fromes Y, Gaillard D, Ponzio O, et al. Reduction of the inflammatory response following coronary bypass grafting with total minimal extracorporeal circulation. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2002;22:527–33. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Remadi JP, Rakotoarivelo Z, Marticho P, Benamar A. Prospective randomized study comparing coronary artery bypass grafting with the new mini-extracorporeal circulation Jostra System or with a standard cardiopulmonary bypass. Am Heart J. 2006;151:198. [Google Scholar]
  7. Huybregts RA, Morariu AM, Rakhorst G, et al. Attenuated renal and intestinal injury after use of a mini-cardiopulmonary bypass system. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;83:1760–6. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. van_Dijk D, Spoor M, Hijman R, et al. Cognitive and cardiac outcomes 5 years after off-pump vs on-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery. JAMA. 2007;297:701–8. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Motallebzadeh R, Kanagasabay R, Bland M, Kaski JC, Jahangiri M. S100 protein and its relation to cerebral microemboli in on-pump and off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2004;25:409–14. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Stroobant N, Van_Nooten G, Van_Belleghem Y, Vingerhoets G. Relation between neurocognitive impairment, embolic load, and cerebrovascular reactivity following on- and off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Chest. 2005;127:1967–76. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Cheng W, Denton TA, Fontana GP, et al. Off-pump coronary surgery: Effect on early mortality and stroke. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2002;124:313–20. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Likosky DS, Marrin CA, Caplan LR, et al. Determination of etiologic mechanisms of strokes secondary to coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Stroke. 2003;34:2830–4. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Roach GW, Kanchuger M, Mangano CM, et al. Adverse cerebral outcomes after coronary bypass surgery. Multicenter Study of Perioperative Ischemia Research Group and the Ischemia Research and Education Foundation Investigators. N Engl J Med. 1996;335:1857–63. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Fischer UM, Weissenberger WK, Warters RD, Geissler HJ, Allen SJ, Mehlhorn U. Impact of cardiopulmonary bypass management on postcardiac surgery renal function. Perfusion. 2002;17:401–6. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Wang MJ, Chen TL, Fan SZ, Chu SH. Change of blood pressure and urine flow rate during cardiopulmonary bypass and its relation to postoperative renal function. J Formos Med Assoc. 1994;93:222–6. [Google Scholar]
  16. Weis F, Kilger E, Beiras-Fernandez A, et al. Association between vasopressor dependence and early outcome in patients after cardiac surgery. Anaesthesia. 2006;61:938–42. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Gold JP, Charlson ME, Williams-Russo P, et al. Improvement of outcomes after coronary artery bypass. A randomized trial comparing intraoperative high versus low mean arterial pressure. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1995;110:1302–11, discussion 1311-4. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Caputo M, Bryan AJ, Calafiore AM, Suleiman MS, Angelini GD. Intermittent antegrade hyperkalaemic warm blood cardioplegia supplemented with magnesium prevents myocardial substrate derangement in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1998;14:596–601. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Calafiore AM, Teodori G, Mezzetti A, et al. Intermittent antegrade warm blood cardioplegia. Ann Thorac Surg. 1995;59:398–402. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Edmonds HLJr, Rodriguez RA, Audenaert SM, Austin EHIII, Pollock SBJr, Ganzel BL. The role of neuromonitoring in cardiovascular surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 1996;10:15–23. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Moehle DA. Neuromonitoring in the cardiopulmonary bypass surgical patient: Clinical applications. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2001;33:126–34. [Google Scholar]
  22. Yao FS, Tseng CC, Ho CY, Levin SK, Illner P. Cerebral oxygen desaturation is associated with early postoperative neuropsychological dysfunction in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2004;18:552–8. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Edmonds HLJr. Multi-modality neurophysiologic monitoring for cardiac surgery. Heart Surg Forum. 2002;5:225–8. [Google Scholar]
  24. Goldman S, Sutter F, Ferdinand F, Trace C. Optimizing intraoperative cerebral oxygen delivery using noninvasive cerebral oximetry decreases the incidence of stroke for cardiac surgical patients. Heart Surg Forum. 2004;7:E376–81. [Google Scholar]
  25. Zalaquett R. Fifty years of the heart-lung machine. Report on the pioneers and heroes and about the circumstances that led to the great invention, which allowed the treatment, and in many cases, the cure of heart illnesses (in Spanish). Rev Med Chil. 2003;131:1337–44. [Google Scholar]
  26. Blomback M, Kronlund P, Aberg B, et al. Pathologic fibrin formation and cold-induced clotting of membrane oxygenators during cardiopulmonary bypass. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 1995;9:34–43. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. Murkin JM, Adams SJ, Novick RJ, et al. Monitoring brain oxygen saturation during coronary bypass surgery: A randomized, prospective study. Anesth Analg. 2007;104:51–8. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Liebold A, Khosravi A, Westphal B, et al. Effect of closed minimized cardiopulmonary bypass on cerebral tissue oxygenation and microembolization. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006;131:268–76. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. Sungurteki H, Boston US, Cook DJ. Bypass flow, mean arterial pressure, and cerebral perfusion during cardiopulmonary bypass in dogs. J Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia. 2000;114:25–28. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. van der Linden JA, von Ahn H, Ekroth R, Tyden H. Middle cerebral artery flow velocity during coronary surgery; influence of clinical variables. J Clin Anesth. 1990;2:7–15. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. Soller BR, Idwasi PO, Balaguer J, et al. Noninvasive, near infrared spectroscopic-measured muscle pH and PO2 indicate tissue perfusion for cardiac surgical patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass. Crit Care Med. 2003;31:2324–31. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Kaufman J, Almodovar MC, Zuk J, Friesen RH. Correlation of abdominal site near-infrared spectroscopy with gastric tonometry in infants following surgery for congenital heart disease. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2008;9:62–8. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Schöttler J, Lutter G, Boning A, et al. Is there really a clinical benefit of using minimized extracorporeal circulation for coronary artery bypass grafting? Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008;56:65–70. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.